Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung DV150F

Here is a in-depth review of the Canon SX160 IS versus Samsung DV150F, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Samsung. The image resolution of the SX160 IS (16MP) and the DV150F (16MP) is relatively comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The SX160 IS was released 6 months later than the DV150F and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the SX160 IS matches up versus the DV150F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX160 IS & Samsung DV150F. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX160 IS Gallery & Samsung DV150F Gallery.

For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SX160 IS comes with exterior measurements of 111mm x 73mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") and a weight of 291 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Samsung DV150F has measurements of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

See the Canon SX160 IS versus Samsung DV150F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the SX160 IS and the DV150F.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the SX160 IS and DV150F is 86 and 96 respectively.

Often, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing specifications. The photograph below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SX160 IS and DV150F.

Plainly, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of pictures though you would want to factor the age of the cameras into account.