Canon SX20 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1
65 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2398e/2398eb6315c0ffc6719ed9ab8631269c8624fe5b" alt="Canon PowerShot SX20 IS front Canon PowerShot SX20 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62a6a/62a6a983a6af3568f6b39137b109a895b4f78a46" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 front Ricoh WG-M1 front"
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Canon SX20 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 600g - 128 x 88 x 87mm
- Announced July 2010
- Previous Model is Canon SX10 IS
- Updated by Canon SX30 IS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Canon SX20 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Let's look closer at the Canon SX20 IS versus Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the SX20 IS (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty similar and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The SX20 IS was launched 5 years earlier than the WG-M1 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX20 IS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the SX20 IS matches up against the WG-M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon SX20 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX20 IS and Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX20 IS Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX20 IS over the Ricoh WG-M1
SX20 IS | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | ![]() | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Canon SX20 IS
WG-M1 | SX20 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2014 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 50 months |
Common features in the Canon SX20 IS and Ricoh WG-M1
SX20 IS | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Canon SX20 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon SX20 IS features outside dimensions of 128mm x 88mm x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Canon SX20 IS versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the SX20 IS versus the WG-M1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65b09/65b0922f6614f4938f6e8dd9b70ce41591d33b53" alt="Canon SX20 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison Canon SX20 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX20 IS and WG-M1 is 65 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6a97/d6a972b2ba90c622543f065473ecb7744f7d01ea" alt="Canon SX20 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison Canon SX20 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX20 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by reviewing technical specs. The pic underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX20 IS and WG-M1.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to offer greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged SX20 IS is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4826/a482607022b60a56ee3800b49224829bf1e8c313" alt="Canon SX20 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison Canon SX20 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX20 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5e0c/e5e0cab7adb4e9ef0ebdfb8ff63ec3fbf8013517" alt="Canon SX20 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX20 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon SX20 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX20 IS | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX20 IS | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2014-09-12 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 4 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-560mm (20.0x) | (1×) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 0cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 1.5 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 115k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.80 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/500 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 600 gr (1.32 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 128 x 88 x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC / MMC / MMC Plus / HC MMC Plus | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $500 | $2,000 |