Canon SX20 IS vs Samsung NX5
65 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
80 Imaging
54 Features
50 Overall
52
Canon SX20 IS vs Samsung NX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 600g - 128 x 88 x 87mm
- Announced July 2010
- Replaced the Canon SX10 IS
- Refreshed by Canon SX30 IS
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Launched June 2010
Photography Glossary Canon SX20 IS vs Samsung NX5 – The 2010 Showdown of Superzoom Bridge vs Entry-Level Mirrorless
When I first laid hands on the Canon PowerShot SX20 IS and Samsung NX5 back in 2010, it felt like holding two very different philosophies in my palms. Both priced around $500, yet catering to distinct photographic appetites - a superzoom bridge camera and a fledgling mirrorless competitor aiming to disrupt DSLRs' domain. Over a decade of camera testing has taught me that specs alone never tell the full story, but understanding these machines in their context reveals a lot about how we've evolved - and the crossroads enthusiasts faced in that era.
Today, we'll delve deep into the Canon SX20 IS and Samsung NX5, unpacking their technical traits, real-world performance, and quirks across the major photographic landscapes. Whether your eye is on landscapes, wildlife, or video, I'll share firsthand insights to show which device aligns with your style and needs.
So, let’s get this careful comparison rolling!
Getting a Feel: Size, Design & Handling Dynamics
First impressions: size, weight, and ergonomics shape how a camera becomes an extension of your vision. The SX20 IS is a heftier bridge camera, sculpted to feel like a pro DSLR alternative, whereas the NX5 goes for sleek mirrorless simplicity.

The Canon SX20 IS weighs around 600 grams and measures 128x88x87 mm, which contributes to its solid feel and stability - great for long telephoto shooting without too much strain. The grip is pronounced, comfortable, and the physical heft helps steady shots. Its 2.5-inch fully articulated screen, albeit small by today’s standards and with modest 230k-dot resolution, stands up well in various angles - useful for macro or awkward compositions.
In contrast, the Samsung NX5 is more compact and lighter at 499 grams and 123x87x40 mm, reflecting its mirrorless heritage. The lighter weight enables extended handheld use without fatigue, and the 3-inch AMOLED fixed screen (also 230k dots) produces bolder colors and better contrast than Canon's LCD. However, the lack of articulation on the NX5 means you sacrifice some framing flexibility.

The top view shows that the SX20 IS embraces the bridge style - with dedicated dials for PASM modes, zoom rocker, and direct flash control, encouraging manual engagement. The NX5 opts for a cleaner layout, leaning on menus for some functions, though supports full manual exposure modes. My experience is that the Canon's design invites users to learn photography fundamentals, while the NX5 looks to woo DSLR shooters transitioning into mirrorless territory - a balance of simplicity and control.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heartbeat of the Camera
This is where things get juicy. The Canon SX20 IS packs a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor with 12MP, while the Samsung NX5 boasts a 15MP APS-C CMOS sensor - a serious leap in sensor size.

That sensor surface area disparity (28.07 mm² vs 365.04 mm²) translates to more light-gathering ability and, usually, better image quality for the NX5. CCD sensors like Canon’s in the SX20 IS often offer punchy colors and decent dynamic range in good light but struggle with noise at higher ISOs. The NX5’s CMOS sensor, paired with Samsung’s DRIM engine processor, delivers cleaner images, especially in low-light scenarios and higher ISOs (100-3200 native range versus Canon’s 80-1600).
From my lab tests and field work, the NX5 provided sharper images with finer detail retention, and its RAW support offers post-processing flexibility - critical for enthusiasts wanting to sculpt their vision fully. The SX20 IS, lacking RAW, leans toward point-and-shoot ease but limits professional workflows.
Sure, the Canon’s 20x zoom lens (28-560 mm equivalent) offers impressive framing versatility out of the box without swapping glass, but tradeoffs appear in corner softness and distortion at extremes - common grievances in small-sensor superzooms.
Viewing and Composition: Screens and Viewfinders
A camera’s interface is the communicative bridge between you and the captured moment.

Canon’s 2.5-inch fully articulating LCD is a blessing for creative angles, live viewing macro shots, and video work, despite its low resolution. The electronic viewfinder, modest as it is, provides framing aid but sometimes feels lacking in detail and refresh rate.
Samsung’s NX5 sports a 3-inch Active Matrix OLED screen that truly shines with vibrant color and higher contrast. Its fixed nature is a drawback for creative angles but rewards daylight visibility. The NX5’s electronic viewfinder (0.57x magnification and full coverage) offers better compositional precision. For my tastes, the larger and more accurate EVF of the NX5 feels like a leap forward in mirrorless usability, especially when shooting in bright conditions.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: The Crucial Snap
Autofocus can make or break your shot - especially in dynamic scenes like sports, wildlife, or street photography.
Canon SX20 IS features a 9-point contrast-detection AF system with some multi-area options but lacks face detection or continuous autofocus modes. It’s a camera designed for deliberate shooting rather than high-speed action.
Samsung NX5 ups the ante with 15 focus points, including face detection and contrast-detection AF, alongside continuous AF for moving subjects. Burst shooting is also faster at 3 fps compared to Canon’s modest 1 fps.
In a field test shooting birds and fast street scenes, the NX5 consistently nailed focus quicker and adapted better to shifting scenes. Canon’s system was adequate for casual snaps or landscapes but often left me waiting on the autofocus, missing fleeting moments.
Lens Availability and System Expandability
The SX20 IS comes with a fixed lens - its strength is simplicity and reach (20x zoom) but a downside if you seek specialized optics. You’re locked into that lens’s performance, which includes an aperture range from f/2.8–5.7, decent but trailing prime lenses or high-end zooms.
Samsung’s NX system launched with 32 interchangeable lenses from wide-angle to telephoto primes and zooms. This variety opened doors for macro, portrait, and even advanced video options. For photographers wanting to build a system, this flexibility is a game-changer.
Performance Across Genres: Who Shines Where?
Portrait Photography
The NX5’s larger APS-C sensor helps achieve pleasing skin tones, natural bokeh, and better subject separation. Its autofocus face detection assists in locking onto eyes, while interchangeable lenses allow fast primes for creamy backgrounds.
The Canon SX20 IS, with its small sensor and fixed lens, delivers less background blur and struggles with shallow depth of field effects. Its autofocus lacks face detection, so portrait framing requires patience.
Landscape Photography
The SX20’s wide 28mm equivalent start and 12MP resolution suffice for casual landscapes. However, the tiny sensor limits dynamic range and fine detail capture in highlights and shadows.
The NX5’s 15MP APS-C sensor offers better resolution and dynamic range, critical for capturing complex scenes with varied lighting. Plus, its RAW files provide latitude in post-processing to recover shadow and highlight details.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Canon’s massive 20x zoom reaches far, a huge plus for wildlife - but autofocus speed and lack of continuous AF curtail action shooting. The 1 fps burst rate severely limits capturing multiple frames of fast motion.
Samsung’s NX5, while lacking extreme telephoto reach without extra lens investment, outperforms in autofocus tracking, continuous shooting (3 fps), and faster shutter speeds (max 1/4000s). This makes it preferable for action snaps when paired with suitable lenses.
Street Photography
Portability is king in the streets. The NX5’s smaller footprint and lighter weight make it less obtrusive and easier to handle discreetly.
Canon’s bridge design and lens bulkiness make it more conspicuous, although the extended zoom can be handy for candid shots from a distance.
Low-light performance again favors the NX5’s sensor and ISO range, allowing more flexibility for ambient-lit environments without flash.
Macro Photography
While neither camera specializes in macro, the fully articulated screen on the SX20 IS aids framing close subjects especially with its close-focus capabilities. The lack of interchangeable lenses restricts optical versatility.
The NX5, combined with a close-focus or macro lens from its growing lineup, would offer superior focusing precision and image quality. However, the fixed screen does pose practical framing challenges.
Night and Astro Photography
Shooting stars or low-light cityscapes stresses sensor performance and manual control.
The NX5’s higher ISO capability up to 3200, RAW output, and manual shutter speeds up to 30 seconds enable astrophotography basics. The better sensor handles noise more gracefully.
Canon’s highest native ISO stops at 1600, with a max shutter speed of 15 seconds, and no RAW support restricts post-processing options. Its smaller sensor likely produces noisier results after long exposures.
Video Capabilities: Modest by Modern Standards
Both cameras support 720p HD recording at 30fps (H.264 codec) - respectable for 2010.
Canon’s articulated screen makes video framing more flexible; however, its fixed lens restricts creative zooming options.
The NX5 offers a sharper screen and better manual control during video but lacks image stabilization, which can mar handheld footage quality compared to Canon’s optical stabilization.
Neither camera has microphone or headphone jacks, limiting sound control for videographers.
Ergonomics and User Interface: Comfort and Workflow
Canon’s physical controls - dials, buttons, zoom rocker - offer tactile feedback and ease of quick adjustments. The fully articulated LCD is a practical plus, especially for video and challenging shooting angles.
Samsung favors a simpler button layout emphasizing menu navigation. The OLED screen’s superior contrast improves visibility outdoors. The electronic viewfinder is a standout feature aiding composition.
Both cameras lack touchscreen interfaces, anticipated given their era.
Battery, Storage, and Connectivity
The SX20 IS uses four AA batteries - a mixed bag in my experience. While you can swap AAs anytime (convenient on travel), performance varies widely by battery quality, and overall battery life is mediocre.
Samsung’s NX5 employs a proprietary BP1130 lithium-ion pack, offering a more stable 400-shot battery life - better suited for extended shoots.
Both accept SD/SDHC cards but only the SX20 adds compatibility with MMC variants. Neither sports wireless connectivity - no Wi-Fi or Bluetooth here, a feature that wasn’t mainstream in 2010 but is a glaring omission today.
Build Quality and Environmental Resistance
Neither camera offers weather sealing or ruggedness. They’re designed for enthusiast usage under standard conditions. The Canon SX20 IS feels bulkier and more robust in the hand, while the NX5’s mirrorless body is more delicate.
Price-to-Performance: The 2010 Value Equation
At launch, both retailed near $500. What you get in return vastly differs:
- Canon SX20 IS appeals to users wanting extensive zoom in an all-in-one without fussing over lenses.
- Samsung NX5 targets enthusiasts desiring superior image quality, interchangeable lens capability, and a pathway to more advanced photography.
For the adventurous, system-expandable NX5 offers investment longevity. The SX20 IS is a specialized, no-nonsense superzoom.
Real-World Image Samples
Need proof? Here’s a gallery illustrating the output difference. Note the sharper details and improved dynamic range from the NX5, alongside Canon’s versatility in zoom framing.
Performance Ratings Summary
I collated scores for each camera based on resolution, speed, ergonomics, and versatility - anchored by my extensive comparative testing.
As expected, the NX5 leads broadly, especially in image quality and autofocus, while the SX20 IS trades speed for zoom coverage.
Genre-Specific Scores: Which Camera Excels Where?
Let’s see how they stack up by photographic category.
- Portraits: Samsung takes it due to sensor size and face detection.
- Landscape: Samsung again, thanks to dynamic range.
- Wildlife: Canon’s telephoto reach vs. Samsung’s speed - Samsung slightly ahead for action.
- Sports: Samsung’s continuous AF and burst win by a mile.
- Street: Samsung’s compactness and low-light edge.
- Macro: Tie, marginal advantage to Samsung for lens options.
- Night/Astro: Samsung’s ISO and manual mode flexibility.
- Video: Canon’s articulating screen earns points.
- Travel: Nintendo-style, Samsung is lighter; Canon offers zoom ease.
- Professional work: Samsung’s RAW support is critical.
Who Should Buy Which?
Choose the Canon SX20 IS if:
- You want an all-in-one superzoom with extensive reach for casual wildlife or travel photography.
- You prefer intuitive manual controls integrated into a bridge form factor.
- You like articulated LCDs for video and creative framing.
- You favor AA battery convenience for remote shooting.
- You don’t want to fuss about interchangeable lenses or post-processing.
Choose the Samsung NX5 if:
- You desire superior image quality and dynamic range for portraits and landscapes.
- You plan to grow a lens collection and experiment across genres.
- Speed and autofocus accuracy for sports or street shooting matter.
- You want RAW support and robust manual control.
- Portability and ergonomics enhance your shooting experience.
Final Thoughts: A Tale of Two Paths in 2010
Looking back, these cameras represent divergent routes for enthusiasts in 2010: the Canon SX20 IS as a powerhouse superzoom bridge camera for zoom lovers versus the Samsung NX5 as a gateway into mirrorless sophistication and image quality.
Over years of testing thousands of cameras, the lesson remains: sensor size and system flexibility outweigh zoom factors for serious photographers. But for casual shooters craving reach and ease, the Canon offers compelling value and pocket-friendly batteries.
Whichever road you choose, understanding these nuances empowers confident decisions beyond marketing blurbs.
Here’s to discovering your photographic muse - camera in hand, vision ahead!
If you enjoyed this deep dive or have questions about these models or others, drop me a line. After all, photography is a journey best shared.
Canon SX20 IS vs Samsung NX5 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX20 IS | Samsung NX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX20 IS | Samsung NX5 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2010-06-01 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4 | DRIM Engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | 28-560mm (20.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.80 m | 11.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/500 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 600g (1.32 lb) | 499g (1.10 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 128 x 88 x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC / MMC / MMC Plus / HC MMC Plus | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $500 | $499 |