Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon A900
90 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Announced May 2009
- Newer Model is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced February 2016
- Updated by Nikon A1000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon A900 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon A900, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Canon and Nikon. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and A900 (20MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX200 IS was unveiled 7 years earlier than the A900 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summary of how the SX200 IS grades against the A900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon A900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Nikon Coolpix A900. The full galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Nikon A900
| SX200 IS | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Canon SX200 IS
| A900 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 82 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Nikon A900
| SX200 IS | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS provides external measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Nikon A900 has proportions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon A900 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the SX200 IS against the A900.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SX200 IS and A900 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The pic here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SX200 IS and A900.
Clearly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should count on the Nikon A900 to produce extra detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon A900 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Nikon |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.4-6.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 289 gr (0.64 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-5L | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $329 | $400 |