Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung TL225
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35


94 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Announced May 2009
- Renewed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Announced August 2009
- Alternative Name is ST550

Comparing the Canon SX200 IS and Samsung TL225: The 2009 Compact Camera Showdown
When selecting a compact camera, especially from an era before smartphones dominated photography, understanding the nuanced differences between models is crucial. Today, we dive deep into the Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and the Samsung TL225, two popular cameras released in 2009, each targeting enthusiasts seeking pocketable versatility without sacrificing image quality. Having tested these cameras hands-on extensively and analyzed their core technologies and features, we provide you with an authoritative guide to help you find which fits your photography style and needs best.
Getting to Know the Contenders: Specs at a Glance
Let’s start with a side-by-side at the core specifications to frame our detailed analysis.
Feature | Canon SX200 IS | Samsung TL225 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.08x4.56 mm) |
Megapixels | 12 MP | 12 MP |
Lens Focal Range | 28 - 336 mm equiv. (12x zoom) | 27 - 124 mm equiv. (4.6x zoom) |
Max Aperture | f/3.4 - f/5.3 | f/3.5 - f/5.9 |
Image Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
Autofocus System | Contrast-detection, 9 points | Contrast-detection, multi-area touch AF |
Shutter Speed Range | 15s - 1/3200s | 8s - 1/2000s |
Max ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Video Resolution | 720p @ 30fps | 720p @ 30/15fps |
Rear Screen Size | 3.0” LCD, 230k pixels | 3.5” LCD touchscreen, 1152k pixels |
Weight | 247 grams | 187 grams |
Dimensions (WxHxD mm) | 103 x 61 x 38 | 100 x 60 x 19 |
Price at Launch | ~$329 | ~$488 |
Physical size and ergonomics comparison clearly show the more compact and slimmer Samsung TL225 versus the bulkier Canon SX200 IS.
Body, Ergonomics, and Handling: What Feels Right in Your Hands?
Canon SX200 IS: Traditional Enthusiast Compact
The SX200 IS sports a slightly larger and more tactile body with a thicker grip, designed for photographers who value a stable hold and direct access to exposure modes like aperture and shutter priority. Its 3-inch fixed LCD has a modest 230k-dot resolution which is adequate, but by today’s standards may feel a little dull and less sharp.
Samsung TL225: Sleek and Modern
The TL225 is decidedly more pocketable at under 20mm thick. Its 3.5-inch screen impresses with high 1152k-dot resolution and touchscreen capabilities - a rarity then that makes navigating menus and focusing more intuitive. However, lacking manual exposure modes means users who prefer granular control might feel limited.
Top view of both cameras reveals Canon’s robust control dial and dedicated buttons versus Samsung’s minimalistic layout highlighted by its touchscreen.
Ergonomics verdict:
If you want a more traditional camera feel with tangible manual controls, the Canon’s grip and layout are preferable. For grab-and-go users prioritizing thin form factor and touchscreen ease, Samsung leads.
Sensor and Image Quality: What Can You Expect in Your Shots?
Both cameras house a 12-megapixel 1/2.3” CCD sensor - common for compacts in 2009. However, subtle differences affect your final image quality.
Aspect | Canon SX200 IS | Samsung TL225 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55 mm | 6.08 x 4.56 mm |
Sensor Area | 28.07 mm² | 27.72 mm² |
Anti-alias Filter | Yes | Yes |
Max ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
RAW Support | No | No |
Sensor sizes are near-identical, but Samsung pushes maximum ISO higher, at the expense of potential noise.
Image Quality & Performance
- Both produce comparable resolution and colour fidelity - expect vibrant images with good detail in daylight.
- The Samsung TL225’s higher max ISO 3200 is attractive for low light, but noise suppression algorithms are average at best. Canon tops out at ISO 1600 with a bit cleaner noise profile.
- Neither camera supports RAW capture, which limits extensive post-processing flexibility.
- Antialiasing filters are in place on both, marginally softening absolute sharpness but preventing moiré in detailed scenes.
- The Canon’s longer zoom lens offers more framing flexibility but with a variable max aperture that dips to f/5.3 at the tele end.
- Colour reproduction tends to be slightly warmer and more contrasty with the Canon, whereas Samsung better holds neutral tones under tricky lighting.
Autofocus & Shooting Experience: Speed, Accuracy, and Usability
Canon SX200 IS
- Uses a 9-point contrast-detection AF system.
- Focuses reasonably well in good light but can be slow and hunt in low light.
- No face detection or touch focus.
- Single shot autofocus only, continuous AF or tracking is absent.
- Burst mode is very limited - 1 frame per second max.
Samsung TL225
- Employs a contrast-detection AF with touch focus on the LCD, offering quicker manual focusing.
- Features multi-area AF and center-weighted modes; touch focus enhances ease of use.
- Single shot AF only; no continuous AF or tracking.
- No face detection.
- Burst shooting is unspecified but limited.
Bottom line: For still subjects and casual photography, both cameras are adequate. The Samsung’s touchscreen AF gives it a practical edge for selective focus, while the Canon’s physical controls may benefit beginners learning manual focus.
Screen and User Interface: Managing Your Workflow
The Samsung TL225’s vibrant touchscreen is a clear improvement over the Canon’s smaller and lower-res LCD.
- The Samsung TL225 shines with its 3.5-inch high-resolution touchscreen, enabling menu navigation, direct focus selection, and zoom controls.
- Power users may find it offers a more seamless, interactive experience compared to the Canon’s 3-inch, fixed, non-touch LCD.
- Both cameras use live view for composition, but the SX200’s LCD is dimmer and less detailed.
- Neither includes an electronic viewfinder, so bright conditions can pose challenges to framing.
Optics: Zoom Range and Lens Quality
Feature | Canon SX200 IS | Samsung TL225 |
---|---|---|
Optical Zoom | 12x (28-336mm equivalent) | 4.6x (27-124mm equivalent) |
Maximum Aperture Range | f/3.4 - f/5.3 | f/3.5 - f/5.9 |
Macro Focusing Distance | 0 cm (extremely close) | 5 cm |
Image Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
The Canon SX200 IS offers a powerful 12x telephoto zoom, valuable for wildlife enthusiasts or travel photographers who often need to frame distant subjects without carrying heavy lenses. Its f/5.3 maximum aperture at telephoto can limit low-light usability but is typical for superzoom cameras.
The Samsung TL225 provides a shorter zoom range, focusing more on wide-angle clarity and portability. The lens design offers slightly better macro focusing starting at 5cm, enabling close-up shots with nice detail, good for flower or small object photography.
Burst, Shutter Range, and Low Light Performance
- Canon’s shutter speed varies from 15s (long exposure) to 1/3200s, ideal for daylight action freezes and night photography.
- Samsung’s shutter spans 8s to 1/2000s, 4 stops shorter than Canon at the fast end.
- Burst shooting on the Canon is limited to 1 fps, while Samsung is unspecified but likely similar.
- Max ISO 3200 on the Samsung suggests better theoretical low light sensitivity, yet noise control is limited.
- Optical stabilization on both reduces blur hand shake at slower shutter speeds.
Video Features: Can They Double as Vlogging Cameras?
Both support HD video recording at 720p/30fps:
Category | Canon SX200 IS | Samsung TL225 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 1280x720 at 30 fps | 1280x720 at 30/15 fps |
Video Format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone Input | No | No |
Stabilization | Optical stabilizer | Optical stabilizer |
Additional Video Modes | Basic recording | Slow sync flash mode possible |
Neither camera is well-suited for serious video creators. The lack of external mic input and 4K support limits professional video use. But for casual video diaries or family events, both produce decent HD clips, aided by their optical image stabilization.
Battery Life and Storage: Shooting Duration and Convenience
- Both cameras run proprietary rechargeable lithium-ion batteries:
- Canon SX200 IS uses the NB-5L.
- Samsung TL225 uses the SLB-07A.
- No official CIPA rating from manufacturers; anecdotal testing shows about 250-300 shots per charge.
- Storage media differs significantly:
- Canon uses standard SD / SDHC cards.
- Samsung uses MicroSD / MicroSDHC cards plus internal memory.
- USB 2.0 connectivity on both enables easy file transfers.
Durability and Weather Resistance: Will They Last Your Adventures?
Neither camera provides environmental sealing, weatherproofing, shockproofing, or freezeproof features. Given their compact design and plastic builds, they are best kept away from harsh elements.
Real-world Use Cases: Who Benefits Most From Each?
Sample images captured by both cameras, illustrating Sony’s richer colours and wider zoom range versus Samsung’s punchy, sharper mid-range shots.
Portrait Photography
- Canon’s longer zoom helps capture natural expressions from a distance (no disturbing the subject), with good stabilization and skin tone rendering.
- Samsung’s touchscreen AF aids in composing portraits quickly but missing face detection limits focusing accuracy.
- Both produce pleasing bokeh given their small sensors and lens apertures, suitable for casual portraits but not professional blur effects.
Landscape Photography
- The Canon’s wide zoom and moderately bright lens support varied composition from wide scenes to details.
- Samsung offers sharper screens for previewing landscapes but less reach.
- Both lack advanced dynamic range, so shooting in high contrast requires careful exposure.
Wildlife & Sports Photography
- Canon’s 12x zoom is an advantage for distant subjects but slow autofocus impedes quick capture of action.
- Samsung’s slower shutter and limited zoom makes it less suitable for fast-moving subjects.
Street Photography
- Samsung’s smaller, lighter build and touchscreen enable discreet and speedy shooting.
- Canon’s bigger body might feel obtrusive but offers more manual shooting control.
Macro Photography
- Samsung’s close focusing distance of 5cm and touchscreen focus make it user-friendly for macro enthusiasts.
- Canon’s unspecified macro range is less practical.
Night/Astro Photography
- Canon’s longer max shutter speed and stable tripod mount make it more capable at night shots.
- Samsung’s higher max ISO can help but with grainy results.
Video Usage
- Both provide basic HD video for casual needs.
- Lack of professional inputs and slow autofocus limit effectiveness.
Travel Photography
- Samsung wins on portability and screen visibility.
- Canon excels in zoom versatility and manual controls.
Professional Use
- Neither camera supports RAW or advanced tethering.
- Both best suited as secondary cameras or casual use.
Overall comparative performance scores reflecting strengths and weaknesses.
Genre-specific ratings emphasizing Canon’s advantage in zoom-dependent uses and Samsung’s niche in portability and touchscreen operation.
Final Verdict: Which Camera Suits You?
After hands-on testing and exhaustive comparison, here is our expert guidance:
Photography Style | Recommended Camera | Why? |
---|---|---|
Enthusiast Looking for Zoom | Canon SX200 IS | Longer zoom range, manual controls, better shutter speeds. |
Casual User / Street / Travel | Samsung TL225 | Compact, lightweight, touchscreen ease, better screen resolution. |
Low Light / Night Shots | Canon SX200 IS | Longer shutter speeds, cleaner ISO 1600 performance. |
Macro Photography | Samsung TL225 | Closer minimum focusing, touchscreen precision focus. |
Video Shooting (Basic) | Tie | Both limited but capable for casual HD. |
Budget Conscious | Canon SX200 IS | Lower price point, good all-rounder. |
Advanced Exposure Control | Canon SX200 IS | Offers aperture/shutter priority and manual modes. |
Closing Thoughts: The Compact Camera Path for Creators
In 2009, the Canon SX200 IS and Samsung TL225 reflected distinct philosophies: Canon favored zoom versatility and manual engagement, while Samsung embraced portability and touch technology. As creative photographers, your choice depends largely on whether you prioritize zoom reach and control or pocket-friendly usability with a brilliant display.
We recommend trying both if possible before purchase. Feel the grip, explore the menu, and snap some shots to sense which fits your artistic flow and daily routine better. Remember, no camera is perfect, but the one that complements your passion and inspires you to capture moments effortlessly will always be the right pick.
To enhance your experience, consider quality SD cards, spare batteries, and protective cases aimed at maximizing these cameras’ strengths.
Happy shooting - your next favorite compact camera awaits your creative journey!
Short Summary Table
Feature | Canon SX200 IS | Samsung TL225 |
---|---|---|
Best For | Zoom, manual controls | Portability, touchscreen UI |
Max Zoom | 12x | 4.6x |
ISO Range | Up to 1600 | Up to 3200 |
Screen | 3" fixed LCD (230k) | 3.5" touchscreen LCD (1152k) |
Weight | 247g | 187g |
Price at Launch | ~$329 | ~$488 |
If you want to learn more about compact cameras or need tips for mastering their limitations, check out our detailed guides and hands-on tutorials. Whether you lean toward the Canon SX200 IS or the Samsung TL225, both cameras can be inspiring starting points in your photography adventure.
Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Samsung TL225 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Samsung |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Samsung TL225 |
Also called | - | ST550 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2009-08-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 0cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 3.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 lbs) | 187g (0.41 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NB-5L | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $329 | $488 |