Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S5
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb816/fb8162e802e5f525cfb7fe76d9a65dc2e12da269" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 front Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 front"
60 Imaging
76 Features
92 Overall
82
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.0" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Push to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 714g - 133 x 97 x 82mm
- Released August 2020
- New Model is Panasonic S5 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S5 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic S5, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the S5 (24MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and S5 (Full frame) provide totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M1 II was released 4 years earlier than the S5 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 II scores against the S5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S5 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Panasonic Lumix DC-S5. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Panasonic S5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic S5
E-M1 II | S5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic S5 over the Olympus E-M1 II
S5 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2020 | ![]() | September 2016 | More modern by 47 months |
Screen resolution | 1840k | ![]() | 1037k | Clearer screen (+803k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic S5
E-M1 II | S5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3.0" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both are selfie friendly | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Panasonic S5 has proportions of 133mm x 97mm x 82mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 714 grams (1.57 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic S5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the S5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d293/7d293c24b2f6326f02e51011c49f364c0d906de8" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S5 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S5 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and S5 is 68 and 60 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65626/65626b75330178eea3711429ee2c6cbf8c59e95d" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S5 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes merely by going through technical specs. The picture below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and S5.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic S5 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 II will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0398e/0398e055d17cc6d0e0d83f1a82fe35c2d8b890d4" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/273ad/273ad79041dc895fadc8d6c61fe7c2f042e71ec3" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic S5 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2020-08-14 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 225 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Leica L |
Total lenses | 107 | 31 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.0 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,840 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync w/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes (can be charged with high-power laptop/tablet chargers or portable power banks) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) | 714 gr (1.57 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 133 x 97 x 82mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 440 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD Memory Card, SDHC Memory Card, SDXC Memory Card |
Card slots | Two | Two |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $1,999 |