Clicky

Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill

Portability
90
Imaging
35
Features
37
Overall
35
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front
 
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
Portability
57
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs

Canon SX200 IS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
  • 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Successor is Canon SX210 IS
Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Introduced April 2012
  • Replaced the Sigma SD1
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview

Below, we are contrasting the Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Canon and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is very similar but the SX200 IS (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) use different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The SX200 IS was brought out 3 years earlier than the SD1 Merrill and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the SX200 IS grades against the SD1 Merrill when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 SX200 IS SD1 Merrill 

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Canon SX200 IS

 SD1 Merrill SX200 IS 
IntroducedApril 2012May 2009More recent by 35 months
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Sigma SD1 Merrill

 SX200 IS SD1 Merrill 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Canon SX200 IS offers external measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sigma SD1 Merrill has specifications of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).

Analyze the Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the SX200 IS vs the SD1 Merrill.

Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and SD1 Merrill is 90 and 57 respectively.

Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements purely by going over technical specs. The visual below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SX200 IS and SD1 Merrill.

As you have seen, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The SX200 IS due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will offer you greater detail having its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older SX200 IS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX200 IS as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Portrait photography camera
29
has manual focus
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
65
you can focus manually
MP count good (15 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no liveview
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Street photography highlights
Sigma SD1 Merrill Street photography highlights
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (247g)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
57
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
weather sealing
fixed screen
no image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon SX200 IS
Sports photography with Sigma SD1 Merrill
27
built in image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
61
MP count good (15MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
weather sealing
comes with phase detect AF
no liveview
no image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Travel photography advice
Sigma SD1 Merrill Travel photography advice
63
lighter than others (247 grams)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
great reach (336mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (12MP)
does not offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
54
weather sealing
MP count good (15MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX200 IS as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Landscape photography camera
43
has manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
63
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3")
MP count good (15MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
weather sealing
no liveview
no image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon SX200 IS
Vlogging with Sigma SD1 Merrill
30
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (247 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
does not offer selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic socket
9
no video recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX200 IS and Sigma SD1 Merrill
 Canon PowerShot SX200 ISSigma SD1 Merrill
General Information
Company Canon Sigma
Model Canon PowerShot SX200 IS Sigma SD1 Merrill
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Released 2009-05-14 2012-04-10
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Dual True II
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 15MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4800 x 3200
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 28-336mm (12.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.4-5.3 -
Macro focus range 0cm -
Total lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 96 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 seconds -
Highest shutter speed 1/3200 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.20 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 247g (0.54 lb) 790g (1.74 lb)
Dimensions 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NB-5L -
Self timer Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $329 $2,339