Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35


57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Released May 2009
- Successor is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Introduced April 2012
- Replaced the Sigma SD1

Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Canon and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is very similar but the SX200 IS (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) use different sensor sizing.

The SX200 IS was brought out 3 years earlier than the SD1 Merrill and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the SX200 IS grades against the SD1 Merrill when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Sigma SD1 Merrill. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
SX200 IS | SD1 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Canon SX200 IS
SD1 Merrill | SX200 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2012 | ![]() | May 2009 | More recent by 35 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Sigma SD1 Merrill
SX200 IS | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Canon SX200 IS offers external measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sigma SD1 Merrill has specifications of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the SX200 IS vs the SD1 Merrill.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and SD1 Merrill is 90 and 57 respectively.

Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements purely by going over technical specs. The visual below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SX200 IS and SD1 Merrill.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The SX200 IS due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will offer you greater detail having its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older SX200 IS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX200 IS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Sigma |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2009-05-14 | 2012-04-10 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4800 x 3200 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | - |
Macro focus range | 0cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 790g (1.74 lb) |
Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NB-5L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $329 | $2,339 |