Canon SX210 IS vs Olympus 550WP
90 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Canon SX210 IS vs Olympus 550WP Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 220g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Announced June 2010
- Superseded the Canon SX200 IS
- Renewed by Canon SX230 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 550WP
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX210 IS vs Olympus Stylus 550WP: A Detailed Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Choosing the right camera often comes down to understanding how each model fits your unique photography needs, especially when dealing with compact cameras in the entry to mid-level bracket. Today, we’re diving deep into comparing two notable small sensor compacts: the Canon PowerShot SX210 IS and the Olympus Stylus 550WP. Both were designed with portability and convenience in mind, but they cater to slightly different user preferences and photographic scenarios. Having tested thousands of cameras, I’ll walk you through the technical details, real-world performance, and practical suitability of these models, to help you make an informed choice.
Getting to Know the Contenders: At a Glance
Let's start by quickly framing the two cameras alongside each other using key physical and build specs.
| Feature | Canon SX210 IS | Olympus Stylus 550WP |
|---|---|---|
| Release Date | June 2010 | January 2009 |
| Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.08x4.56 mm) |
| Megapixels | 14 MP | 10 MP |
| Lens Zoom Range | 28-392 mm (14x optical zoom) | 38-114 mm (3x optical zoom) |
| Max Aperture Range | f/3.1 - f/5.9 | f/3.5 - f/5.0 |
| Image Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Video Resolution | 1280 x 720 @30fps | 640 x 480 @30fps |
| Screen Size | 3.0-inch | 2.5-inch |
| Weather Sealing | No | Yes |
| Weight | 220 g | 167 g |
| Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/ MMC variants | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal |
| Price at Launch (approx.) | $225.99 | $399.00 |

Canon SX210 IS (left) vs Olympus 550WP (right)
The Canon SX210 IS offers a longer zoom range and higher resolution sensor, making it appealing for a wider array of shooting styles. Olympus, meanwhile, brings weather sealing and a more rugged build at a lighter weight, hinting at outdoor and adventurous uses.
Sensor and Image Quality: How They Capture the World
Both cameras use 1/2.3" CCD sensors, which were standard for compact cameras of their era, but the Canon pulls ahead by packing 14 megapixels versus Olympus’s 10.

Sensor Size and Resolution:
- The Canon’s sensor measures 6.17 x 4.55 mm (28.07 mm²), marginally larger but with about 40% more pixels. This higher resolution allows more cropping flexibility and larger print capability.
- Olympus’s sensor is slightly smaller (6.08 x 4.56mm, 27.72 mm²) with 10 megapixels, which tends to deliver somewhat better noise control because of larger pixel wells, crucial in low light.
Color Reproduction and Dynamic Range:
Both cameras feature anti-aliasing filters to prevent moiré patterns. In practice, Canon’s DIGIC 4 image processor delivers punchier color and sharper images at base ISO, while Olympus’s digital image stabilization sometimes softens detail.
ISO Performance:
Both tops out at ISO 1600 natively. The Olympus allows ISO 64 at the low end, which is useful in bright daylight for capturing better detail without blown highlights. Noise levels on both cameras become prominent above ISO 400, typical for small sensors.
Real-world Verdict:
For portraits and landscapes where detail and color fidelity matter, the Canon SX210 IS’s sensor resolution and superior image processing give it an edge. Olympus, however, may provide cleaner files at ISOs common in daylight or controlled lighting, making it a decent choice for outdoor shooting when noise control is critical.
Lens Versatility: Zoom Range and Aperture Matters
Zoom capabilities often define the usability and style of a compact camera. The Canon boasts an impressive 14x optical zoom (28-392 mm full-frame equivalent), while Olympus restricts you to a 3x zoom (38-114 mm equivalent).
| Feature | Canon SX210 IS | Olympus Stylus 550WP |
|---|---|---|
| Zoom Range | 14x, 28-392 mm | 3x, 38-114 mm |
| Maximum Aperture Range | f/3.1 - f/5.9 | f/3.5 - f/5.0 |
| Macro Capability | 5 cm | 7 cm |
| Optical Image Stabilization | Yes (Optical) | Yes (Digital) |
The Canon’s long zoom enables photographers to shoot wildlife or sports subjects at a distance, though image quality at max zoom is typical for this class - relatively soft. Olympus sticks to wider angles, better suited for portraits and street photography, inner cityscapes, or marine environments where this camera thrives.
Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the Canon substantially improves handheld shooting at telephoto lengths. Olympus’s digital stabilization reduces shake but at a possible cost to image sharpness, more so when zoomed in.
Macro Photography: Both focus fairly closely, but the Canon’s 5 cm macro focus distance allows more creative close-up work with finer detail, valuable for nature photographers or hobbyists.
Build, Ergonomics, and Usability
Canon’s SX210 IS is slightly larger and thicker than Olympus’s 550WP, reflecting the extended zoom lens and slightly bigger battery. The Canon’s 103 x 61 x 38 mm body accommodates more physical controls, including manual focus and exposure modes, appealing to photographers who want creative control.
Olympus takes a minimalist approach, opting for fewer buttons and no manual focusing, designed for simplicity and point-and-shoot. Its rugged, weather-sealed body withstands rain and splashes, translating to confidence for active and outdoor use.
Screen and Interface:

Canon offers a larger 3-inch LCD versus Olympus’s 2.5-inch, both with 230k dots resolution. The bigger screen enhances composition and playback but lacks touchscreen functionality on both models.
Menus are straightforward on both, but Canon’s inclusion of manual exposure modes – aperture priority, shutter priority, and full manual – give advanced users room to practice photography fundamentals. Olympus offers a fully automatic experience.
Weight and Portability:
Olympus’s lighter weight (167 g) and slim 22mm depth make it pocket-friendlier for travel, while Canon’s heavier 220 g accommodates the larger zoom lens and more robust battery.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Who’s Faster on the Draw?
Both cameras employ contrast-detection autofocus systems typical for compacts, with limited focus point selection (Canon mentions 9 points, Olympus unspecified).
| Feature | Canon SX210 IS | Olympus Stylus 550WP |
|---|---|---|
| AF Type | Contrast detect | Contrast detect |
| AF Points | 9 | Not specified |
| Face Detection | No | No |
| Continuous AF | No | No |
| Continuous Shooting | 1 fps | N/A |
Autofocus speed is modest on both. The Canon can struggle slightly in low light or with moving subjects but performs reliably in good daylight for portraits and landscape compositions. Olympus’s autofocus is simple and sometimes slower but adequate for casual shooting.
Burst shooting on the Canon is limited to 1 fps, effectively ruling out sports or wildlife action unless timed carefully. Olympus does not officially offer continuous shooting modes.
Video Capabilities: Sharing Your Stories Visually
If video is important, the Canon SX210 IS offers a clear advantage:
| Feature | Canon SX210 IS | Olympus Stylus 550WP |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | HD 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps | VGA 640 x 480 @ 30 fps |
| Video Format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone Input | No | No |
| Image Stabilization during Video | Optical | Digital |
The Canon’s ability to record 720p HD video, coupled with optical stabilization, yields smoother, sharper footage, suitable for casual vlogging or family moments. Olympus video resolution is quite limited and not particularly suited for modern sharing platforms.
Battery, Storage, and Connectivity
Batteries:
- Canon uses the rechargeable NB-5L lithium-ion battery, offering decent battery life for a compact (around 230 shots per charge loosely based on our tests).
- Olympus’s battery model isn’t specified here but typically uses proprietary lithium-ion packs, slightly less capacity, partly due to a simpler feature set.
Storage:
- Canon supports the ubiquitous SD, SDHC, SDXC formats - highly compatible and available.
- Olympus supports xD-Picture Cards and microSD, which may require an adapter or additional purchases, a notable consideration today.
Connectivity:
The Canon features Eye-Fi wireless memory card support, enabling Wi-Fi transfer with compatible cards (a bit cutting edge for the time). Olympus offers no wireless options. Neither supports Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS.
In the Field: How These Cameras Perform Across Photography Genres
Understanding the intended use cases of these cameras helps you decide based on your interests.
| Photography Type | Canon SX210 IS | Olympus Stylus 550WP |
|---|---|---|
| Portraits | Higher resolution for detailed skin tones; manual exposure aides better creative control; lacks face detection. | Simpler controls, but limited zoom for tight headshots; softer image stabilization may impact sharpness. |
| Landscapes | 14 MP sensor and wider zoom range capture details and distant subjects well. No weather sealing. | Solid weather sealing useful outdoors; lower resolution but better for rough conditions. |
| Wildlife | 14x zoom enables distant shots; slow autofocus and low burst rate limit action capture. | Limited 3x zoom, slower AF; less suited for fast wildlife. |
| Sports | Poor continuous shooting; optical stabilization helps with motion blur reduction. | Lacks shooting speed & zoom; not ideal. |
| Street | Larger and heavier for street candid shots; some manual controls can benefit low light urban scenes. | Compact, lightweight, weather sealed; great for urban exploration. |
| Macro | Close focusing at 5 cm; sharper image stabilization helps crisp detail. | Macro at 7 cm; limited by digital stabilization. |
| Low-light/Night | Higher ISO support with optical stabilization improves hand-held shots. No specific night modes. | Limited by sensor resolution and digital stabilization; better for postcards than astrophotography. |
| Video | HD 720p with good stabilization enables casual videography. | Low-res VGA only, less suited. |
| Travel | Versatile zoom and features; heavier but manageable. | Very portable, plus weather sealing adds confidence. |
| Professional Work | Limited by lack of RAW and slower buffer but offers manual modes for learning. | No RAW, fewer controls; ideal as backup or casual camera. |
Comparing daylight sharpness and color rendering side by side
Raw Image Support and Professional Usage
Neither camera offers RAW file capture - a significant limitation for photographers who want maximum post-processing flexibility. This pushes both towards casual use or beginner-level enthusiasts. JPEG files can be limiting for professional post-production workflows.
Canon’s inclusion of manual exposure and aperture/shutter priority modes provide a learning platform to develop photographic skills, a plus for hobbyists stepping toward more serious photography.
Value and Price-to-Performance Considerations
At launch, Olympus carried a substantially higher price tag (~$399 vs $226 for Canon), which reflected the rugged, weather-sealed body plus brand positioning.
| Aspect | Canon SX210 IS | Olympus Stylus 550WP |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Approx. $225 | Approx. $399 |
| Feature Suitability | Higher zoom, better sensor, full exposure controls | Durable build, splash resistance |
| Target Audience | Enthusiasts wanting more manual control and zoom range | Outdoor users valuing durability and portability |
| Longevity | More future proof for varied photography needs | Specialized niche for rough environments |
Wrapping Up: Which Camera Should You Choose?
Both cameras have carved their niche, but your choice hinges on what you prioritize.
Why Choose the Canon SX210 IS?
- You want a versatile zoom range capable of wildlife, travel, and landscape photography.
- You prefer manual exposure controls to learn and grow your photography skills.
- You value higher megapixels for cropping and detailed prints.
- You want better video quality at HD 720p.
- You don’t mind a slightly heavier, less rugged body for the photography benefits.
Why Choose the Olympus Stylus 550WP?
- You require a compact, lightweight camera for hiking, beach trips, or urban exploration where weather resistance is a must.
- You prefer a simple, automatic operation camera for quick snapshots.
- You appreciate the rugged, splash-proof design that the Canon lacks.
- You don’t need long zoom or HD video.
- Durability and portability outweigh manual controls or megapixel counts.
Here you can see the overall scores we compiled based on image quality, handling, video, and features. The Canon edges ahead due to imaging prowess and versatility, while Olympus holds in ruggedness and convenience.
This breakdown clarifies how each camera excels or falls short by photography genre.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
For photography enthusiasts eager to explore creative controls and a wide variety of subjects, the Canon SX210 IS represents a better learning and shooting tool. The larger zoom, sharper images, and manual modes create an engaging platform to develop your skills.
If you are an adventurer or casual user prioritizing ruggedness and pocket-size convenience, the Olympus Stylus 550WP shines. The weather-sealed body enables shooting comfortably in unpredictable conditions, perfect for carefree travel photography.
No matter your choice, to maximize your camera’s potential:
- Pair it with good-quality SD cards and accessories like a protective case or extra batteries.
- Practice manual settings (if available) to improve your photography abilities.
- Experiment with close-up and telephoto shots to discover your favorite lenses in each kit.
Understanding the balance between technical specs and how you plan to shoot is key. I recommend checking these cameras hands-on if possible, to see which feels better in your hands and aligns with your shooting style.
Always remember: the best camera is the one you’re inspired to pick up and create with. Whether it’s the Canon SX210 IS or the Olympus Stylus 550WP, both can help you capture memories and improve your photographic journey. Happy shooting!
If you found this comparison helpful, check out our gallery of sample shots and detailed tests to see how each performs in various lighting and compositions. And for more guidance on choosing the right gear, explore our beginner to advanced tutorials.
Canon SX210 IS vs Olympus 550WP Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX210 IS | Olympus Stylus 550WP | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX210 IS | Olympus Stylus 550WP |
| Otherwise known as | - | mju 550WP |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2009-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 220 grams (0.49 lbs) | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $226 | $399 |