Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-10
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Portability
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-10 Key Specs
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Launched February 2012
- Succeeded the Canon SX230 HS
- Successor is Canon SX260 HS
Casio EX-10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Introduced November 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-10 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-10, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Casio. The resolution of the SX240 HS (12MP) and the EX-10 (12MP) is pretty close but the SX240 HS (1/2.3") and EX-10 (1/1.7") offer different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX240 HS was released 21 months before the EX-10 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the SX240 HS grades against the EX-10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS and Casio Exilim EX-10. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX240 HS Gallery and Casio EX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Casio EX-10
| SX240 HS | EX-10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Canon SX240 HS
| EX-10 | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2013 |  | February 2012 | Newer by 21 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 461k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Casio EX-10
| SX240 HS | EX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX240 HS provides external dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-10 has dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") and a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the SX240 HS versus the EX-10.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the SX240 HS and EX-10 is 91 and 83 respectively.
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing technical specs. The pic below should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX240 HS and EX-10.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide the same resolution albeit different sensor dimensions. The SX240 HS contains the smaller sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging. The more aged SX240 HS will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Canon SX240 HS
Portrait photography with Casio EX-10
has manual focus
has face detection autofocus
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
has manual focus
has face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
external flash not possible
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Canon SX240 HS as a Street photography camera
Casio EX-10 as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (224g)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
comes with focus via touch
sensor is small (1/1.7")
heavier than average (384g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Sports photography factors
Casio EX-10 Sports photography factors
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking autofocus
max frames per second low (2.0 frames/s)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (230 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
great battery (455 per charge)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Travel photography features
Casio EX-10 Travel photography features
lighter than competition (224g)
built-in flash
rather wide (25mm)
very long zoom (500mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
terrible battery life (230 shots)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
great battery (455 per charge)
comes with focus via touch
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
heavier than average (384 grams)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon SX240 HS
Landscape photography with Casio EX-10
has manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
terrible battery life (230 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse function
has manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
big screen (3.5 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
great battery (455 shots)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Canon SX240 HS Vlogging factors
Casio EX-10 Vlogging factors
rather wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (224g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic support
quite wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have mic socket
heavier than average (384 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX240 HS vs Casio EX-10 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Casio Exilim EX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Casio Exilim EX-10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2013-11-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 5 | Exilim Engine HS 3 |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 250 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 10.90 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 224 gr (0.49 lb) | 384 gr (0.85 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 shots | 455 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | Li-130A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $456 |