Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-50
91 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38


91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Superseded the Canon SX230 HS
- Successor is Canon SX260 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Canon SX240 HS versus Ricoh WG-50, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the SX240 HS (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The SX240 HS was manufactured 6 years earlier than the WG-50 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the SX240 HS scores versus the WG-50 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX240 HS and Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX240 HS Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Ricoh WG-50
SX240 HS | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Canon SX240 HS
WG-50 | SX240 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2017 | ![]() | February 2012 | More recent by 64 months |
Common features in the Canon SX240 HS and Ricoh WG-50
SX240 HS | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera often, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Canon SX240 HS offers outside dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Canon SX240 HS versus Ricoh WG-50 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the SX240 HS compared to the WG-50.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX240 HS and WG-50 is 91 and 91 respectively.

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at specifications. The photograph below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SX240 HS and WG-50.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-50 to give you greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older SX240 HS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX240 HS vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | Ricoh WG-50 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-02-07 | 2017-05-24 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 224 grams (0.49 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 images | 300 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-6L | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $0 | $280 |