Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Released March 2013
- Superseded the Canon SX260 HS
- Later Model is Canon SX280 HS
Olympus TG-830 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX270 HS was released 3 months later than the TG-830 iHS so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summary of how the SX270 HS scores versus the TG-830 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| SX270 HS | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Canon SX270 HS
| TG-830 iHS | SX270 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| SX270 HS | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2013 |  | January 2013 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and size. The Canon SX270 HS provides external measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus TG-830 iHS has specifications of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the SX270 HS compared to the TG-830 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the SX270 HS and TG-830 iHS is 91 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading through technical specs. The graphic below will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX270 HS and TG-830 iHS.
As you have seen, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-830 iHS to give extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Portrait photography features
Olympus TG-830 iHS Portrait photography features
has manual focus
includes face detection autofocus
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Canon SX270 HS as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-830 iHS as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (233 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Sports photography details
Olympus TG-830 iHS Sports photography details
incredible zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (210 shots)
lacks phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
weather sealing
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Travel photography info
Olympus TG-830 iHS Travel photography info
lighter than others (233g)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
no Timelapse mode
not so great battery pack (210 CIPA)
megapixel count low (12MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
weather sealing
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
no Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon SX270 HS
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-830 iHS
has manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
not so great battery pack (210 shots)
no Timelapse mode
reasonably wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
weather sealing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not available
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Canon SX270 HS Vlogging highlights
Olympus TG-830 iHS Vlogging highlights
rather wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others (233 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
no external microphone socket
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
no microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-03-21 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233 gr (0.51 lb) | 214 gr (0.47 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 shots | 300 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $284 | $0 |