Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung SL202
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Revealed March 2013
- Earlier Model is Canon SX260 HS
- Replacement is Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Other Name is PL50
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Below is a complete review of the Canon SX270 HS versus Samsung SL202, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is very similar and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX270 HS was announced 4 years later than the SL202 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the SX270 HS scores versus the SL202 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Samsung SL202
| SX270 HS | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2013 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 50 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Canon SX270 HS
| SL202 | SX270 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Samsung SL202
| SX270 HS | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Canon SX270 HS has outside measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX270 HS versus Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the SX270 HS and the SL202.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX270 HS and SL202 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by going over specs. The graphic here may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX270 HS and SL202.
All in all, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Canon SX270 HS to offer greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more recent SX270 HS should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Samsung SL202 |
| Also Known as | - | PL50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-03-21 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233 gr (0.51 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $284 | $140 |