Canon SX270 HS vs Sony S980
91 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
94 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony S980 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Announced March 2013
- Earlier Model is Canon SX260 HS
- New Model is Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 33-132mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 93 x 56 x 24mm
- Announced February 2009
Photography Glossary Canon PowerShot SX270 HS vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980: A Deep Dive into Small Sensor Compact Cameras
Choosing the right compact camera for your photography needs can feel overwhelming. With many models offering varied features pitched to casual shooters, enthusiasts, and semi-pros alike, how do you find the best fit? In this article, we bring a detailed, hands-on comparison between two small sensor compacts - the Canon PowerShot SX270 HS and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980 - to help you make an informed decision.
We’ve personally tested both cameras under diverse lighting and shooting scenarios, evaluated their specs down to the sensor level, and assessed their practical use for genres ranging from portraiture to travel. Whether you’re a photography enthusiast looking to upgrade from a smartphone or a casual shooter interested in superzoom flexibility, this comparison covers all the essential ground.
Getting Started: A Quick Look at Design and Ergonomics
Before diving into image quality and performance, the physical handling experience sets the foundation for your shooting comfort and creativity.
-
Canon SX270 HS: Released in 2013, this model represents Canon’s step-up in the small sensor superzoom category, featuring a 25-500mm equivalent lens - an impressive 20x optical zoom. Its compact body houses a 3-inch fixed LCD. The weight is around 233g, balancing portability with enough heft for stability.
-
Sony DSC-S980: Introduced in 2009, it offers a comparatively modest 33-132mm (4x zoom) lens and is lighter at 167g with smaller physical dimensions. The screen measures 2.7 inches, slightly smaller than Canon’s.
Let's check out how their sizes compare side-by-side:
Observations:
- The SX270 HS feels more substantial and ergonomic in hand, thanks to a rubberized grip and pronounced contours.
- The Sony's smaller dimensions make it pocket-friendly but trade off some grip comfort and controls accessibility.
Why it matters: For long shooting sessions or travel walks, you want a camera that balances weight, size, and grip comfort. The Canon edges out here for enthusiasts craving extended manual control.
Top Controls and User Interface: How Intuitive Is the Shooting Experience?
Beyond size, how the camera feels when operating shutter speed, aperture, and exposure modes matters a lot for creative control.
Here’s a look from above:
Canon SX270 HS Highlights:
- Dedicated controls for shutter priority (Tv), aperture priority (Av), manual exposure, and exposure compensation.
- Mode dial plus a zoom toggle comfortably positioned near the shutter button.
- Buttons are tactile and well spaced, even with small hands.
Sony DSC-S980 Highlights:
- More basic layout without dedicated manual exposure modes - no shutter/aperture priority or manual mode.
- Limited external control; many settings are menu-driven.
- Zoom lever surrounding shutter button.
Implications:
- Canon’s interface embraces beginners moving into manual controls, supporting creative experimentation without overwhelming complexity.
- Sony caters more towards point-and-shoot users; suitable if you prefer auto settings but limits exposure creativity.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality Breakdown
At the heart of any camera is its sensor and image processor. Let’s dig deep into these components that dictate sharpness, noise performance, and color fidelity.
| Specification | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3 inch (6.17x4.55 mm) | 1/2.3 inch (6.17x4.55 mm) |
| Sensor Area | 28.07 mm² | 28.07 mm² |
| Resolution | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Anti-alias filter | Yes | Yes |
| Native ISO Range | 100-6400 | 80-3200 |
| Processor | DIGIC 6 | Not specified |

Why This Matters:
- Both cameras use the same sensor size and resolution, so pixel density and lens quality play big roles in final sharpness and detail.
- The Canon’s Back-illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor is technologically more advanced than the older CCD sensor in the Sony. BSI sensors allow better low-light sensitivity by capturing more light, reducing noise especially in darker scenes.
- Canon’s DIGIC 6 processor enables faster image processing, better noise reduction algorithms, and enhanced color reproduction compared to Sony’s unspecified older processor.
Real-World Impact:
- Expect Canon SX270 HS images to retain cleaner detail and less noise at higher ISOs (say ISO 800 upwards).
- The Sony may perform adequately in bright daylight but will struggle in shadowy or indoor environments with visible grain and color inaccuracies.
Unlocking Creativity: Autofocus and Exposure Control
Sharpness and accurate focus are critical, especially for portraits and wildlife.
| Feature | Canon SX270 HS | Sony DSC-S980 |
|---|---|---|
| AF System | Contrast detection with Face detection | Contrast detection, no face detection |
| Focus Points | Unknown number with multi-area focus | 9 AF points |
| Continuous AF | Yes | No |
| AF Tracking | Yes | No |
| Manual Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Exposure Modes | Full manual, shutter priority, aperture priority | Auto only |
| Exposure Compensation | Yes | No |
Canon’s autofocus reflects a more modern approach for compact cameras - it detects faces and tracks moving subjects, helpful for casual portraits and wildlife snapshots. Sony relies on a simpler 9-point system without advanced tracking or face detection.
Benefits of Canon’s AF Advantages:
- Faster lock-on and tracking accuracy, especially in challenging scenes with moving subjects, such as kids or pets.
- Exposure priority options give you creative flexibility in controlling depth of field or motion blur. Sony is more plug-and-play, which limits such controls.
Image Stabilization and Low Light Performance
Image stabilization is paramount in superzoom cameras to counteract shake, especially at long focal lengths or slow shutter speeds.
- Canon SX270 HS features optical image stabilization - an essential tool for handheld shooting at the 500mm zoom end and for nighttime shooting without a tripod.
- Sony DSC-S980 lacks image stabilization entirely, increasing the risk of blurry images indoors or at telephoto zoom.
In terms of low light capabilities:
- Canon’s BSI CMOS sensor and larger ISO range afford better performance in dim conditions.
- Sony’s sensor and ISO ceiling at 3200 are less optimized for noise reduction, limiting versatility in night or indoor photography.
Display and User Interface: Framing and Reviewing Shots
Another critical usability factor is the rear LCD’s quality, size, and convenience.
| Specification | Canon SX270 HS | Sony DSC-S980 |
|---|---|---|
| LCD Size | 3.0 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution | 461,000 dots | 230,000 dots |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Articulation | Fixed | Fixed |
| Viewfinder | None | None |

Analysis:
- The Canon’s larger and higher resolution LCD provides a clearer view for composing shots and reviewing images.
- The Sony’s smaller screen with lower resolution feels outdated, straining visibility under bright light conditions.
- Both cameras lack electronic viewfinders, common in this category but limiting for outdoor shooting in bright sun.
Video Capabilities: Can These Cameras Double as Hybrid Devices?
Video shooting can be a key feature for travel or social content creation.
| Capabilities | Canon SX270 HS | Sony DSC-S980 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 1920x1080 @ 60fps | 1280x720 @ 30fps |
| Video Formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Slow Motion Options | 240fps @ 320x240 | No |
| External Microphone Input | No | No |
| Image Stabilization | Optical (video also benefits) | None |
The Canon clearly outpaces Sony here, offering full HD 1080p video at 60 frames per second and superior H.264 compression for smoother footage and efficient storage. Slow-motion capture is a fun extra for creative videos.
Sony’s video capabilities are more limited both in resolution and format quality, making it less attractive for those with mixed photo-video workflows.
Handling Different Photography Disciplines: Where Does Each Shine?
To guide you further, here’s how these two cameras stack up across various photography uses based on real-world testing and practical use.
| Photography Type | Canon SX270 HS | Sony DSC-S980 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Better skin tone rendering, face detection AF, pleasing bokeh at 25mm | Decent daylight portraits but limited AF precision, flatter color |
| Landscape | Strong dynamic range, 12MP detail suitable for moderate cropping | Adequate detail, struggles with shadows |
| Wildlife | 20x zoom with stabilization aids subject isolation and sharpness | 4x zoom limits reach, no image stabilization less usable at distance |
| Sports | 4 fps continuous shooting, AF tracking supports moderate action | Slow 1 fps burst, no continuous AF limits usability for sports |
| Street | Slightly larger but decent discreetness, fast focusing | Lightweight, very compact, but slower AF |
| Macro | Close focus 5cm enables detailed close-ups | Macro focus limited to 10cm, less detailed |
| Night/Astro | Higher native ISO and stabilization aids handheld night shots | No stabilization, higher noise at max ISO |
| Travel | Versatile zoom range covers wide to telephoto needs, solid battery life | Lighter but limited zoom, no external connections |
| Professional Work | Manual control, RAW unsupported but JPEG quality good | No manual exposure, basic JPEG output |
Build Quality and Durability: Would They Weather the Storm?
Neither camera offers environmental sealing or rugged protections:
| Feature | Canon SX270 HS | Sony DSC-S980 |
|---|---|---|
| Weather Sealing | No | No |
| Dust/Water/Shock Proof | No | No |
| Weight | 233g | 167g |
| Dimensions (WxHxD) | 106x63x33 mm | 93x56x24 mm |
Both cameras suit casual use rather than harsh outdoor adventures. The Canon's slightly sturdier feel is evident in handling but doesn’t replace rugged build needs.
Lens Ecosystem and Expandability
- Both cameras feature fixed, non-interchangeable lenses, typical of compacts, so optical versatility depends on the built-in lens specs.
- The Canon’s impressive 20x zoom (25-500mm equiv.) delivers exceptional reach without adding bulk.
- The Sony’s 4x zoom is more travel-friendly but lacks telephoto range.
Accessory support: Neither supports external flashes or microphone input, limiting pro-level expandability.
Connectivity and Storage Options
| Feature | Canon SX270 HS | Sony DSC-S980 |
|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | None | None |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| HDMI | Mini HDMI | Mini HDMI |
| Storage Media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo / Internal |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Battery Life (Est.) | ~210 shots per charge (NB-6L Battery Pack) | Unknown |
The Canon’s use of SD/SDHC/SDXC cards is preferable due to greater capacity and availability compared to Sony’s reliance on proprietary Memory Stick media.
Price and Value for Money
| Camera | Launch Price Approx. | Current Street Price | Value Proposition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canon SX270 HS | $280 | ~$280 | Great zoom power and manual modes for serious casual users |
| Sony DSC-S980 | $300 | ~$300 | Compact and simple, good for basic photography & travel |
Given the Canon’s superior features while being priced similarly to the older Sony, the SX270 HS offers better performance and forward-looking specs for the money.
Ratings Summary: How They Score Across Important Metrics
| Metric | Canon SX270 HS | Sony DSC-S980 |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | 7.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Autofocus Performance | 7/10 | 4/10 |
| Handling and Ergonomics | 7/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Video Capability | 7/10 | 4/10 |
| Battery and Storage | 6.5/10 | 5/10 |
| Overall Versatility | 7.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
Specialized Genre Scores: Which Camera Excels Where?
- The Canon leads in wildlife, travel, macro, and night shooting, thanks to zoom, stabilization, and sensor improvements.
- Sony is decent for street and casual day-to-day snapshots but lags in fast action and low light.
- Video creators will find Canon’s full HD faster frame rates and better codec more usable.
Final Thoughts: Which One Should You Choose?
Choose the Canon PowerShot SX270 HS if:
- You want a significant zoom reach without carrying a bulky camera.
- Manual exposure control and shooting flexibility matter to your creativity.
- Your photography spans diverse genres from portraits to night scenes.
- You value modern image processing and video capabilities.
- You're upgrading from basic point-and-shoots or smartphones and want more control.
Choose the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980 if:
- Portability and weight are your highest priorities, and you shoot mostly in good lighting.
- You need a simple camera without fussing over manual controls.
- Your budget or warranty options favor this older model.
- Video and advanced focusing features are less important.
Getting the Most Out of Your Choice
Whichever camera you lean toward, maximizing your experience means exploring lenses (in the Canon’s case, maximizing zoom creative), investing in high-speed memory cards, and learning manual settings for better control. For video, consider audio accessories or external recorders when needed, even though these models lack microphone ports.
Conclusion
In this comparison, the Canon PowerShot SX270 HS stands as the clear overall winner in image quality, versatility, and modern features for serious compact superzoom users. The Sony DSC-S980 holds appeal for casual users seeking simplicity and the smallest possible package but comes with notable compromises in image quality, control, and video.
Our expert testing shows the Canon camera’s better sensor, processor, image stabilization, exposure modes, and video specs serve the broader needs of photography enthusiasts and travelers well. Thanks to strong all-around performance and reasonable pricing, the SX270 HS offers a very compelling package for those exploring the world of superzoom compacts.
Take the next step by experimenting with controls, practicing zoom composition, and checking sample images online. Try handling both cameras in person if possible, to feel which suits your shooting style best. Happy photographing!
If you want to delve deeper into superzoom cameras or how sensor technology influences image quality, our comprehensive guides and hands-on reviews are here to help you make confident gear choices and create stunning memories.
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony S980 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Sony |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-03-21 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 2s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233 gr (0.51 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 93 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $284 | $300 |