Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm F900EXR
Portability
81 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
81 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Key Specs
Canon SX400 IS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 313g - 104 x 69 x 80mm
- Introduced July 2014
Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Previous Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Canon SX400 IS and Fujifilm F900EXR, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. The resolution of the SX400 IS (16MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) is relatively similar but the SX400 IS (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") offer different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX400 IS was brought out 19 months after the Fujifilm F900EXR which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the SX400 IS scores versus the Fujifilm F900EXR in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX400 IS and Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX400 IS Gallery and Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX400 IS over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| SX400 IS | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2014 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Canon SX400 IS
| Fujifilm F900EXR | SX400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX400 IS and Fujifilm F900EXR
| SX400 IS | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX400 IS offers outer dimensions of 104mm x 69mm x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Fujifilm F900EXR has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX400 IS and Fujifilm F900EXR in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the SX400 IS and the Fujifilm F900EXR.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the SX400 IS and Fujifilm F900EXR is 81 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by going over specifications. The picture below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX400 IS and Fujifilm F900EXR.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with the identical MP albeit different sensor dimensions. The SX400 IS uses the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow DOF harder. The younger SX400 IS provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX400 IS Portrait photography highlights
Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography highlights
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
resolution is good (16MP)
includes face detect focus
delivers RAW files
lack of manual focus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Canon SX400 IS as a Street photography camera
Fujifilm F900EXR as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competition (232 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Canon SX400 IS as a Sports photography camera
Fujifilm F900EXR as a Sports photography camera
incredible zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
max frames per second very slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery life (190 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
includes tracking focus
comes with phase detect auto focus
tiny sensor (1/2")
bad battery life (260 per charge)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Canon SX400 IS Travel photography factors
Fujifilm F900EXR Travel photography factors
decent megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long zoom (720mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
low battery life (190 shots)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.4)
lighter than competition (232 grams)
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
great zoom (500mm)
missing Timelapse function
bad battery life (260 per charge)
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Canon SX400 IS Landscape photography info
Fujifilm F900EXR Landscape photography info
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
manual exposure not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
low battery life (190 shots)
does not have Time Lapse recording
fairly wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
delivers RAW files
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor (1/2")
bad battery life (260 per charge)
missing Timelapse function
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon SX400 IS
Vlogging with Fujifilm F900EXR
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
slow max aperture (f3.4)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic socket
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (232 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly display
missing microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm F900EXR Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-07-29 | 2013-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 4+ | EXR II |
| Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.8 | f/3.5-5.3 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 11.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 313 gr (0.69 pounds) | 232 gr (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 69 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 pictures | 260 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-11LH | NP-50A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $229 | $380 |
