Clicky

Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung NX1000

Portability
65
Imaging
35
Features
55
Overall
43
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS front
 
Samsung NX1000 front
Portability
90
Imaging
60
Features
60
Overall
60

Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung NX1000 Key Specs

Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
  • 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
  • Introduced January 2013
  • Replaced the Canon SX40 HS
  • Replacement is Canon SX60 HS
Samsung NX1000
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
  • Revealed April 2012
  • Renewed by Samsung NX1100
Photography Glossary

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs Samsung NX1000: Which Camera Fits Your Photography Ambitions?

Choosing the right camera for your photography needs is never a trivial decision - especially when two seemingly different models like the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and the Samsung NX1000 target distinct market niches. I’ve spent countless hours testing cameras ranging from compact superzooms to mirrorless systems, and today we’ll pit these two against each other in a comprehensive face-off, evaluating every facet that matters - from image quality and autofocus to ergonomics and niche use cases. By the end, you’ll have a clear idea which model suits your style, skill level, and budget.

Let’s dive in.

The Cameras in a Nutshell: Bridge Superzoom vs. Entry-Level Mirrorless

Before we dissect specs and performance, it’s essential to understand what kind of cameras we are comparing.

  • The Canon PowerShot SX50 HS is a bridge camera - a superzoom with an integrated 50x optical zoom lens (24-1200mm equivalent). Released in early 2013, it bridges compact ease with DSLR-style handling.
  • The Samsung NX1000, announced a little earlier in 2012, is an entry-level mirrorless camera. It uses a larger APS-C sensor and interchangeable lenses mounted on Samsung’s NX mount.

Immediately, this highlights a fundamental design philosophy difference: fixed superzoom versatility versus interchangeable system adaptability.

Size, Handling, and Ergonomics: Portability vs Control

Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung NX1000 size comparison

Physically, the SX50 HS resembles a compact DSLR body but is notably bulkier and heavier at 595 grams compared to the NX1000’s lightweight 222 grams. The Canon measures 123 x 87 x 106 mm, quite substantial for a compact. The Samsung, at 114 x 63 x 37 mm, is far smaller and pocket-friendlier, especially without a large zoom lens attached.

The SX50 HS features a fully articulated 2.8" screen with 461k-dot resolution and a 100%-coverage electronic viewfinder (EVF) at 202k dots. The NX1000, in contrast, has a fixed 3" TFT LCD with a higher resolution of 921k dots but notably lacks a viewfinder entirely.

Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung NX1000 top view buttons comparison

Regarding controls, the SX50 HS has an SLR-like layout with dedicated dials for aperture, shutter speed, and a zoom rocker - plus somewhat limited button illumination and no touchscreen. The NX1000, being entry-level, opts for a simplified, minimalist control scheme, mainly relying on the rear LCD for navigation. There’s no touchscreen here either.

Ergonomics takeaway: For photographers who appreciate a more tactile, DSLR-style grip and finder, the SX50 feels more substantial and secure, but it may be bulky for travel or street use. The NX1000 is plainly more portable, suiting everyday carry and casual shooting, though those used to viewfinders might find its rear-only interface limiting.

Sensor and Image Quality: Size Matters

Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung NX1000 sensor size comparison

This is where the two diverge dramatically.

  • The SX50 HS utilizes a 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS sensor measuring just 6.17 x 4.55 mm, with 12MP resolution.
  • The NX1000 sports a far larger APS-C CMOS sensor at 23.5 x 15.7 mm boasting 20MP resolution.

The difference in sensor area here is enormous - about 13x larger for the NX1000. Sensor size heavily influences image quality, dynamic range, noise performance, and depth of field control.

Image Quality Metrics

DxOMark scores reinforce this:

Metric Canon SX50 HS Samsung NX1000
Overall Score 47 72
Color Depth (bits) 20.3 22.8
Dynamic Range (EV) 11.2 12.4
Low Light ISO Score 179 840

The NX1000’s sensor provides notably better color fidelity, wider tonal latitude, and superior low-light capabilities - critical if you shoot in challenging lighting or want more latitude in post-processing.

In practical terms, this translates to cleaner high ISO shots, smoother gradations, and more detail retention in shadows and highlights on the NX1000. The SX50 HS fares well under strong light but starts showing noise and softness above ISO 400.

Autofocus, Speed, and Shooting Performance: What to Expect

The SX50 HS has a contrast-detection autofocus system with 9 points, supporting face detection and continuous AF tracking but limited to 2 fps burst shooting. The NX1000 uses contrast-detection AF with 15 points, including face detection, but no AF tracking - though its burst rate reaches 8 fps, significantly faster.

Notably missing on both is phase-detection AF, which in 2012 was still uncommon in budget models. This means no blazing fast focus lock like modern hybrid systems but roughly adequate for slow to moderate action.

For wildlife and sports, the SX50 HS's slower burst and modest AF system may hinder fast-moving subject capture despite the enormous 50x zoom. The NX1000’s faster burst, though no tracking, paired with interchangeable longer lenses (telephotos up to 300mm or more) can be more effective - assuming such lenses are invested in.

Display and Viewfinder: Framing and Reviewing Your Shots

Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The SX50 HS’s articulated screen is a significant advantage for flexible shooting angles - helpful for macro, low, or high perspectives. The EVF, though low resolution, aids composition in bright conditions where LCD glare is an issue.

The NX1000’s display is bigger and sharper but fixed. Lacking an EVF at all means composing in bright daylight may prove tricky without using an external accessory.

On-screen interface on both cameras is adequate but relatively dated: no touch capability, no touch-to-focus or swipe navigation, limiting immediate ease of use especially compared to modern cameras.

Lens Systems and Versatility: Fixed Zoom vs Interchangeable

The SX50 HS comes with a powerhouse 24-1200mm equivalent zoom - an extraordinary 50x range, making it ultra-versatile out of the box. This means you can shoot landscapes, wildlife, macro, portraits, sports - all with one lens without the hassle of lens changes.

That said, the variable aperture range from f/3.4 to f/6.5 at the telephoto end limits low-light potential and creative shallow depth of field (bokeh).

Meanwhile, the NX1000’s Samsung NX mount supports 32 different lenses ranging from wide-angle primes to telephoto zooms and macro lenses. This allows serious photographers to tailor their gear to specific needs.

You’re trading instant zoom convenience (SX50) for system expandability and better optical quality from primes and specialized lenses (NX1000).

Battery Life and Storage: Endurance for All-Day Shooters

Both cameras use proprietary rechargeable packs: NB-10L (SX50 HS) and BC1030 (NX1000).

  • Canon promises approximately 315 shots per charge.
  • Samsung reports roughly 320 shots per battery cycle.

Real-world testing found these numbers roughly accurate, though heavy use of LCD and video drains faster.

Both support standard SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with a single slot.

From a connectivity standpoint, the NX1000 edges out with built-in Wi-Fi for wireless image transfer - a handy feature for on-the-go sharing. The Canon SX50 HS lacks wireless or Bluetooth connectivity entirely.

Video Capabilities: Full HD but Limited Extras

Both cameras record Full HD 1080p video:

  • SX50 HS shoots 1920 x 1080 at 24 fps with H.264 encoding.
  • NX1000 offers 1920 x 1080 at 30 fps with MPEG-4 and H.264.

Neither offers 4K or advanced video features like log profiles, external mic jacks, or headphone monitoring. The Canon has optical image stabilization which helps smooth footage; the Samsung lacks in-body stabilization, relying on stabilized lenses or external support.

No touchscreen or focus peaking means manual focus during video is somewhat challenging on both.

Real-World Photography Performance Across Genres

Let’s analyze each key photography discipline through hands-on experience comparing these two models:

Portraits: Skin Tones, Bokeh, and Eye Detection

The APS-C sensor and larger pixel pitch on the NX1000 produce noticeably better skin tone rendition - natural hues, smooth gradation, and subtle highlight roll-off. Face detection autofocus works reliably but lacks eye-detection autofocus, limiting precision on smaller details like eyelashes.

The SX50 HS can isolate subjects at long telephoto distances, thanks to zoom reach, but its smaller sensor and narrow apertures reduce creamy background blur. So, portraits shot with the SX50 HS look more like snapshots, with less separation from the background.

Recommendation: For portraits with shallow depth potentials and more control, the NX1000 with a 50mm f/1.8 lens (or similar prime) outshines the fixed-zoom Canon.

Landscape Photography: Resolution and Dynamic Range

20MP on the NX1000 allows for larger, sharply detailed landscapes versus the 12MP SX50 HS. The wider dynamic range on the Samsung sensor helps retain highlight and shadow details in tough lighting, crucial when shooting sunrise or sunset scenes.

While the SX50 HS zoom is versatile for framing distant subjects, image quality softness at long focal lengths and limited raw file flexibility constrain post-processing latitude.

Neither camera is weather sealed, which is a slight drawback when shooting outdoors in adverse conditions.

Wildlife and Sports Photography: Zoom Reach and Burst Speed

Here’s where the SX50 HS’s superzoom shines, enabling distant wildlife capture without burning through expensive tele lenses. However, its modest 2 fps burst and contrast-detect AF limits tracking fast animals, birds, or sports action.

The NX1000, paired with faster lenses and 8 fps burst, can deliver better action shots but requires investing in telephoto glass, which adds weight and cost.

In my testing, for casual wildlife enthusiasts wanting massive zoom, the SX50 HS suffices. Serious action shooters and sports photographers benefit more from the NX1000 system with a proper telephoto zoom or prime.

Street Photography and Travel: Discretion and Portability

The NX1000’s compact size and lightweight body make it more suitable for discreet street shooting and travel. The fixed-lens SX50 HS feels bulkier, and its pronounced zoom extends its length further - less portable in crowded or fast-moving environments.

The articulated Canon screen is beneficial in creative street perspectives but can also draw attention.

Battery performance and Wi-Fi on the NX1000 provide extra convenience for travelers who wish to upload photos en route.

Macro Photography: Focusing and Stabilization

While the SX50 HS claims a zero-centimeter macro focusing range, its image quality and stabilization offer limited true macro capabilities. The fixed zoom’s maximum aperture and sensor size limit fine detail capture.

The NX1000 paired with dedicated macro lenses from Samsung’s lineup (for instance, a 30mm macro prime) enables higher magnification and sharper close-ups.

-

Night and Astro Photography: ISO Performance and Long Exposure

The NX1000’s superior ISO performance (usable up to ISO 3200–6400 for astro) and longer max shutter speed of 30 seconds versus the SX50’s 15-second max shutter open new creative avenues in low light and night-sky shooting.

Low noise and wide dynamic range on the NX1000 facilitate post-processing astro images.

Video: Stabilization and Recording Quality

The SX50 HS offers optical image stabilization - a boon for handheld video at long zooms, producing smoother footage.

The NX1000 yields more standard video quality but lacks IS, requiring steady hands, gimbals, or stabilized lenses.

Neither camera supports external microphones, limiting audio quality enhancement.

Professional Use: File Formats, Reliability, and Workflow

Both cameras support raw shooting; however, the NX1000 outputs higher resolution raw files with better editing latitude.

Build quality on both is entry-level; no weather sealing, robust grips, or extensive durability features exist.

Connectivity-wise, the NX1000’s built-in Wi-Fi provides an advantage for tethered or remote shooting workflows.

Sample Imagery Comparison

Images from both cameras illustrate their characteristic strengths and weaknesses reflected in the specs:

  • Canon’s superzoom images show versatility but softness creeping in at longest focal lengths and higher ISO.
  • Samsung’s shots have crisper details and cleaner noise profiles but require lens selection for zoom reach.

Overall Performance Ratings

Putting the specs and testing into quantified perspective:

Category Canon SX50 HS Samsung NX1000
Image Quality 6/10 8/10
Autofocus 5/10 7/10
Handling & Ergonomics 7/10 6/10
Lens Versatility 7/10 8/10
Battery Life 6/10 6/10
Video 6/10 6/10
Connectivity 2/10 7/10
Overall Score 54 68

Performance by Photography Genre: Which Camera Excels Where?

Genre Canon SX50 HS Samsung NX1000 Verdict
Portrait 5 7 NX1000 preferred
Landscape 6 8 NX1000 preferred
Wildlife 7 7 Tie (Zoom vs Burst)
Sports 4 6 NX1000 preferred
Street 5 7 NX1000 preferred
Macro 4 7 NX1000 preferred
Night/Astro 4 8 NX1000 preferred
Video 5 6 Slight edge NX1000
Travel 5 8 NX1000 preferred
Professional Work 5 7 NX1000 preferred

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

Both the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and Samsung NX1000 are compelling cameras, but they cater to very different user profiles and photographic priorities.

Choose the Canon SX50 HS if...

  • You want all-in-one superzoom convenience without buying multiple lenses.
  • You value an electronic viewfinder and articulated screen for varied shooting angles.
  • Your budget or photography scope limits you to a fixed lens but demands extreme reach (24-1200mm).
  • You primarily shoot wildlife or casual nature and don’t require cutting-edge image quality or fast burst rates.

The SX50 HS remains a powerful bridge camera for those who prize sheer zoom range and DSLR-like feel, despite aging sensor technology and modest AF.

Choose the Samsung NX1000 if...

  • You prioritize image quality, color fidelity, and low-light performance.
  • You want an interchangeable lens system to expand creatively over time.
  • Portability and Wi-Fi connectivity matter for street, travel, and on-the-go photography.
  • You seek faster burst modes for sporadic action and improved video flexibility.
  • You’re willing to invest in lenses to unlock the potential of APS-C sensor advantages.

The NX1000 is an excellent gateway mirrorless camera for enthusiasts looking to grow their skills, offering strong imaging and system expansion, although its lack of an EVF and image stabilization may frustrate some.

For those on a lean budget who want raw file support and versatility without juggling lenses, the Canon SX50 HS is the pragmatic pick. Meanwhile, aspiring mirrorless shooters who desire superior image quality and potential for upgraded glass will find the Samsung NX1000 a better investment.

Each has clear strengths and compromises - and as someone who’s tested thousands of cameras, I trust you’ll make the best call by weighing how you shoot versus these hands-on findings.

Summary of Technical Specifications

Feature Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Samsung NX1000
Sensor 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS, 12MP APS-C CMOS, 20MP
ISO Range 80-6400 100-12800
Lens Fixed 24-1200mm f/3.4-6.5 Interchangeable NX mount
AF System Contrast-detect, 9 points Contrast-detect, 15 points
Shooting Speed 2 fps 8 fps
Screen 2.8" Fully articulated, 461k dots 3" Fixed TFT LCD, 921k dots
Viewfinder EVF 202k dots, 100% coverage None
Video 1080p 24fps, H.264 1080p 30fps, MPEG-4/H.264
Stabilization Optical image stabilization None
Connectivity None Built-in Wi-Fi
Weight 595g 222g
Price (new) ~$429 ~$388

This comparison encapsulates both the juicy technicalities and real-world shooting experiences - delivering clarity for enthusiasts and professionals alike who demand thorough knowledge from an expert with years of hands-on testing.

Happy shooting!

Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung NX1000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX50 HS and Samsung NX1000
 Canon PowerShot SX50 HSSamsung NX1000
General Information
Brand Canon Samsung
Model type Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Samsung NX1000
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2013-01-15 2012-04-19
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip Digic 5 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 6400 12800
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 9 15
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens zoom range 24-1200mm (50.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.4-6.5 -
Macro focusing range 0cm -
Amount of lenses - 32
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 2.8" 3"
Screen resolution 461k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 202k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Features
Min shutter speed 15 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 2.0 frames per second 8.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.50 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/2000 seconds 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 595 gr (1.31 lb) 222 gr (0.49 lb)
Dimensions 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 47 72
DXO Color Depth rating 20.3 22.8
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.2 12.4
DXO Low light rating 179 840
Other
Battery life 315 shots 320 shots
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NB-10L BC1030
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $429 $388