Canon SX50 HS vs Sony H200
Portability
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43
Portability
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Canon SX50 HS vs Sony H200 Key Specs
Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
- Announced January 2013
- Succeeded the Canon SX40 HS
- Later Model is Canon SX60 HS
Sony H200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Launched January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX50 HS vs Sony H200 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Canon SX50 HS vs Sony H200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Canon and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the SX50 HS (12MP) and H200 (20MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX50 HS was announced very close to the H200 and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the SX50 HS scores against the H200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX50 HS vs Sony H200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX50 HS Gallery and Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the Sony H200
| SX50 HS | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Canon SX50 HS
| H200 | SX50 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and Sony H200
| SX50 HS | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Same generation |
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Canon SX50 HS vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX50 HS has external measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") and a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has proportions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX50 HS vs Sony H200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the SX50 HS vs the H200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SX50 HS and H200 is 65 and 67 respectively.
Canon SX50 HS vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by checking out specifications. The pic below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX50 HS and H200.
To sum up, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Sony H200 to show extra detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively.
Canon SX50 HS vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Canon SX50 HS
Portrait photography with Sony H200
you can focus manually
above average flash sync speed (1/2,000 seconds)
features face detection focus
supports RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
offers face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Canon SX50 HS Street photography factors
Sony H200 Street photography factors
screen articulates
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
heavier than others in class (595g)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competitors (530g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon SX50 HS
Sports photography with Sony H200
incredible zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (24-633mm 26.4 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
low battery (240 per charge)
has no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Canon SX50 HS Travel photography highlights
Sony H200 Travel photography highlights
flash built-in
display is selfie friendly
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1200mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (595g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
great zoom (633mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
low battery (240 CIPA)
more heavy than competitors (530 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Canon SX50 HS Landscape photography details
Sony H200 Landscape photography details
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (2.8 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse mode
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
low battery (240 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Canon SX50 HS Vlogging features
Sony H200 Vlogging features
reasonably wide (24mm)
display is selfie friendly
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
lack of external mic support
heavier than others in class (595g)
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than competitors (530g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SX50 HS vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-01-15 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | 20cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.8" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 202 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 595g (1.31 lbs) | 530g (1.17 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 47 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 179 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 shots | 240 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery model | NB-10L | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $429 | $250 |