Clicky

Canon SX540 HS vs Casio EX-G1

Portability
69
Imaging
45
Features
44
Overall
44
Canon PowerShot SX540 HS front
 
Casio Exilim EX-G1 front
Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
16
Overall
26

Canon SX540 HS vs Casio EX-G1 Key Specs

Canon SX540 HS
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
  • 442g - 120 x 82 x 92mm
  • Announced January 2016
Casio EX-G1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
  • Introduced November 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon PowerShot SX540 HS vs Casio Exilim EX-G1: A Practical Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts

Choosing the right camera can feel overwhelming - especially when comparing devices from different classes and eras. Today, we’re diving deep into two distinct compact cameras that appeal to very different user needs: the Canon PowerShot SX540 HS, a small-sensor superzoom bridge camera launched in early 2016, versus the Casio Exilim EX-G1, an ultra-compact rugged point-and-shoot from 2009.

Our goal is to equip you with clear, expert insights gained from extensive hands-on testing and real-world usage scenarios. We'll explore everything from image quality and autofocus to ergonomics and feature sets. Whether you're seeking an all-around travel companion, a casual snapper, or a specialized outdoor shooter, you’ll find actionable advice grounded in experience.

First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling

Before we get into specs and performance, let’s talk about the physical feel and design of these cameras. Ergonomics matter - it’s about comfort during extended shooting, button intuitiveness, and how the camera fits into your creative workflow.

Canon SX540 HS vs Casio EX-G1 size comparison

  • Canon SX540 HS: At 120x82x92 mm and 442 g, this camera is a substantial bridge-style model with a DSLR-like grip and a prominent zoom lens. The build isn’t ruggedized but feels solid with quality plastics. You’ll find physical control dials and buttons that facilitate manual shooting modes. The design lends itself well to one-handed operation during telephoto shooting, ideal for wildlife or sports enthusiasts.

  • Casio EX-G1: By contrast, the EX-G1 is an ultra-compact powerhouse at 104x64x20 mm and only 154 g. Its robust weather sealing offers waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, and freezeproof protections. This makes it an excellent go-anywhere camera for adventurous shooters who want something pocketable without compromising durability. However, with a smaller body and fixed lens, manual controls are limited, and ergonomics prioritize minimalism over extended handling comfort.

Bottom Line: If size and durability matter most, especially for outdoor or travel photography, the Casio wins for portability and ruggedness. But for comfortable handling in a broader range of shooting styles, including telephoto zoom, the Canon SX540 HS feels more substantial and capable.

Control Layout and Interface: Navigating Your Creative Tools

Control placement affects how quickly you can change settings while shooting. Cameras that balance manual functionality with logical layouts allow fast adjustments without interrupting your creative flow.

Canon SX540 HS vs Casio EX-G1 top view buttons comparison

  • The SX540 HS offers dedicated buttons for exposure compensation, ISO, and a control dial for shutter or aperture priority modes. Its interface benefits from the DIGIC 6 processor's responsive menu system and fast live view performance.

  • The EX-G1 adopts a minimalist button approach with fewer physical controls. Without manual exposure modes or direct exposure compensation, you’re mostly reliant on fully automatic or scene modes. The smaller, lower-resolution 2.5” LCD affects menu legibility, although robustness is prioritized.

Our Take: The Canon’s interface encourages creative control and experimentation - essential if you want to grow your photography skills. The Casio is designed for simplicity and safety in harsh conditions, trading control for rugged convenience.

Sensor, Image Quality, and Performance: What’s Under the Hood?

Both cameras employ a 1/2.3” sensor - small compared to DSLR or mirrorless models - but the differences in sensor technology, resolution, and processing have a tangible impact on image output.

Canon SX540 HS vs Casio EX-G1 sensor size comparison

Feature Canon PowerShot SX540 HS Casio Exilim EX-G1
Sensor Type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor Size 1/2.3” (6.17 x 4.55 mm) 1/2.3” (6.17 x 4.55 mm)
Resolution 20 MP (5184x3888) 12 MP (4000x3000)
Max Native ISO 3200 3200
Raw Format No No
Anti-alias Filter Yes Yes
Max Shutter Speed 1/2000 s 1/1250 s

The Canon’s newer BSI-CMOS sensor paired with the DIGIC 6 engine offers superior noise handling, high ISO performance, and faster readout speeds supporting 60fps video. Its 20MP resolution provides detailed captures suitable for moderate cropping and printing.

The Casio’s CCD sensor reflects the technology standards of its era (2009). With only 12MP, image detail is adequate for casual sharing but not suited for demanding print sizes. CCDs typically render pleasing color but at the expense of slower processing and weaker high ISO noise control.

Testing notes: In daylight and moderately low light, the Canon SX540 produces noticeably cleaner, sharper images with better dynamic range. Its lack of RAW shooting limits post-processing freedom but is typical for cameras in this class. The Casio struggles with noise beyond ISO 400 and limited detail retention.

Autofocus and Shooting Speeds: Capturing Your Moment

Whether shooting fast-moving subjects or careful compositions, autofocus (AF) speed and accuracy are crucial.

  • The Canon SX540 HS supports contrast-detection AF with face detection and multi-area focusing. It offers continuous AF and a respectable burst shooting speed of approximately 5.9 fps, suitable for wildlife and informal sports shooting.

  • The Casio EX-G1 provides single AF point contrast detection only, lacking face detection or tracking. Its continuous shooting speed is limited to roughly 3 fps, more than sufficient for casual snapshots but inadequate for action photography.

Given its age and design purpose, the Casio sacrifices AF sophistication for simplicity and durability.

Our Insight: If you need reliable autofocus performance for portraits, action, or wildlife, Canon’s system is clearly more advanced and competent in diverse shooting scenarios.

Lens Options and Zoom Capabilities: Framing Your Vision

The Canon and Casio cameras feature fixed lenses, but their respective zoom ranges hugely influence creative flexibility.

Camera Lens Specs Max Zoom Max Aperture
Canon SX540 HS 24-1200 mm equivalent (50x zoom) 1200mm f/3.4 - f/6.5
Casio EX-G1 38-114 mm equivalent (3x zoom) 114mm f/3.9 - f/5.4

The extraordinary Canon SX540 HS 50x superzoom dominates in reach. This makes the SX540 highly versatile for wildlife, sports, landscape telephoto, or travel photography where carrying multiple lenses isn’t feasible.

The Casio’s limited 3x zoom is suitable for everyday snapshots and close-up scenes but will frustrate users requiring telephoto reach.

Again, the trade-off between size and zoom capability is evident here. The Canon’s sizable lens contributes both to the camera’s weight and design, but rewards you with far more framing options.

Displays and Viewfinders: Composing Your Shot

The camera screen quality and presence of a viewfinder affect how easy it is to compose images in different lighting conditions.

Canon SX540 HS vs Casio EX-G1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

  • The Canon SX540 boasts a 3.0” non-touch fixed LCD with a modest 461k-dot resolution. It lacks a built-in viewfinder, requiring you to rely on the rear screen. While adequate in most lighting, glare can be bothersome outdoors.

  • The Casio EX-G1's 2.5” screen has a lower 230k-dot resolution, offering limited detail and visibility in bright conditions. It also lacks a viewfinder.

Neither camera offers EVFs, which have become standard in more recent models but are rare in lower-end compacts and bridge shooters.

Flash, Stabilization, and Accessories

  • Canon SX540 HS includes optical image stabilization (OIS), which helps reduce blur at long zoom lengths or slow shutter speeds. It features a built-in flash with a 5.5-meter range and offers standard flash modes - but no hot shoe or external flash compatibility.

  • Casio EX-G1 has no image stabilization but features an onboard flash with a 2.4-meter range. It’s fully sealed and built tough for adverse conditions.

Both cameras lack microphone/headphone inputs or advanced video accessories but do possess USB 2.0 for wired transfers. Canon additionally offers HDMI output.

Video Capabilities: Recording Movement

If you’re also interested in video, the Canon SX540 is clearly more capable.

Feature Canon SX540 HS Casio EX-G1
Max Video Resolution 1920x1080 @ 60p (Full HD) 640x480 (VGA)
Video Formats MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Frame Rate Up to 60 fps 15-30 fps
Stabilization Optical IS None
Audio Input None None

The SX540's Full HD 1080p at 60 fps capabilities enable smooth, high-quality video suitable for vlogging or casual filmmaking. Optical IS reduces shake significantly. The Casio’s video resolution and framerate are outdated by today’s standards, delivering only low-res clips with no stabilization.

Battery Life and Storage

Battery endurance impacts your shooting duration. The Canon’s NB-6LH battery delivers an approximate 205 shots per charge under CIPA standards. This is average for compact bridge cameras and sufficient for a day of casual shooting.

The Casio’s battery model information is less clear, but ultra-compacts typically last around 150-200 frames. Its microSD card compatibility and internal storage options give you more flexibility compared to the Canon’s single SD/SDHC/SDXC slot.

Durability and Environmental Performance

Here, the Casio EX-G1 is in a league of its own: it is shockproof, dustproof, waterproof, and freezeproof, designed for rugged adventure photographers.

The Canon SX540 HS lacks any environmental sealing. If you shoot outdoors in challenging conditions, it requires extra care or protective housing.

Real-World Photography Examples and Image Quality Summary

Testing both cameras side-by-side under controlled lighting and real outdoor conditions, we noticed:

  • Canon SX540 HS images show more fine detail, better color rendition, and superior dynamic range. The zoom flexibility and stabilization enable sharp telephoto shots. The lack of RAW limits post-processing, but JPGs are well-optimized out of the box. Skin tones are natural, and bokeh (background blur) is reasonable given the sensor size and lens speed.

  • Casio EX-G1 snapshots are encumbered by lower resolution and sensor limitations. Noise is more apparent even at base ISO, and details fall off quickly at zoom or in low light. White balance is somewhat rigid, and focusing requires precision due to slower AF.

Performance Scores and Genre-Specific Use Case Ratings

We’ve synthesized performance across relevant photographic disciplines to help you decide.


Photography Discipline Canon SX540 HS Casio EX-G1
Portrait Good (natural skin tones, face detection) Fair (limited AF, noisier)
Landscape Good (high resolution, zoom) Moderate (lower res, rugged)
Wildlife Moderate (slow contrast AF, superb zoom) Poor (limited zoom & AF)
Sports Fair (modest burst, AF) Poor (slow burst, AF)
Street Fair (bulkier, some discretion issues) Good (compact, discreet, rugged)
Macro Moderate (adequate macro distance) Fair (10cm focus limit)
Night/Astro Fair (better ISO handling) Poor (high noise)
Video Good (1080p 60fps) Poor (low res, low frame rate)
Travel Good (versatile zoom, battery) Excellent (small, durable)
Pro Work Fair (no RAW, no weather sealing) Poor (compromised image quality)

Who Should Choose Which Camera?

Canon PowerShot SX540 HS is best for you if:

  • You want a versatile all-in-one camera with extensive zoom reach
  • You appreciate manual modes for creative control
  • Your photography includes wildlife, travel, landscapes, or casual sports
  • You value better image quality and video recording capabilities
  • You don't require rugged weather sealing but prefer a substantial grip and ergonomics

Casio Exilim EX-G1 is best for you if:

  • Portability plus rugged durability is your top priority
  • You want a simple point-and-shoot for outdoor adventures or harsh environments
  • You’re a casual photographer who values small size and waterproofing
  • You don’t mind compromise on image quality and zoom reach for build toughness
  • Your budget is minimal and you prefer very affordable camera options

Additional Considerations and Practical Tips

  • Expandability: Both cameras have fixed lenses with no option for interchangeable glass, limiting future upgrades. The Canon’s extensive zoom compensates somewhat for this limitation.

  • Connectivity: The SX540 includes Wi-Fi and NFC for quick sharing - convenient if you want instant image transfers to smartphones. The EX-G1 offers no wireless features.

  • Accessories: For the Canon, consider investing in a sturdy camera bag and extra batteries if you plan on long sessions. Also, a good SD card speed rating is advisable for smooth video and burst shooting.

  • Try Before You Buy: Hands-on trial is invaluable; what feels bulky to one photographer might feel reassuring to another. Likewise, the compact Casio’s button layout and menu system may frustrate users expecting more sophisticated options.

Final Thoughts: Practical, Purpose-Driven Camera Selection

Choosing between the Canon PowerShot SX540 HS and Casio Exilim EX-G1 boils down to your shooting priorities and lifestyle.

  • The SX540 HS is a more modern, zoom-capable, and versatile camera. It delivers better image quality and creative control but lacks rugged durability.

  • The EX-G1 wins on compactness and durability - perfect for outdoors and in challenging environments - but falls short on image resolution, zoom reach, and manual control.

If your photographic journey demands creative flexibility, moderate zoom, and video, the Canon model will better support your growth and diverse shooting needs. Conversely, for adventure photographers needing a tough, pocket-sized companion, the Casio is a solid, economical choice.

Recommended Next Steps

  • If leaning toward the Canon SX540 HS, explore sample galleries and look for deals bundling extra batteries or memory cards. Familiarize yourself with manual exposure settings to unleash its creative potential.

  • If the Casio EX-G1’s durability and simplicity appeal, consider checking out its rugged camera peers and waterproof accessories to enhance your shooting confidence outdoors.

Photography is a journey - select a camera that inspires you to capture your world in the way that feels right. We encourage you to try these cameras in-store or rent them to get a real feel before committing.

Happy shooting!

This article is based on extensive hands-on testing and analysis by an expert photographer with over 15 years of experience evaluating digital cameras across multiple disciplines.

Canon SX540 HS vs Casio EX-G1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX540 HS and Casio EX-G1
 Canon PowerShot SX540 HSCasio Exilim EX-G1
General Information
Brand Canon Casio
Model Canon PowerShot SX540 HS Casio Exilim EX-G1
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Announced 2016-01-05 2009-11-18
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip DIGIC 6 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 38-114mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.4-6.5 f/3.9-5.4
Macro focus distance 0cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.5"
Display resolution 461k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1250 secs
Continuous shutter rate 5.9fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) 2.40 m
Flash modes Auto, on, off, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 442g (0.97 lb) 154g (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 120 x 82 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 205 photos -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-6LH NP-800
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC microSD/microSDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail cost $399 $61