Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z400
61 Imaging
40 Features
67 Overall
50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43bce/43bce14d5c185c472e110d1ebbf449a8d31d22c9" alt="Canon PowerShot SX60 HS front Canon PowerShot SX60 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70d0c/70d0c5e774e4b863f8559227301385a081b73620" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z400 front Casio Exilim EX-Z400 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-1365mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 650g - 128 x 93 x 114mm
- Released September 2014
- Replaced the Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Canon SX60 HS versus Casio EX-Z400, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Canon and Casio. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the SX60 HS (16MP) and EX-Z400 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The SX60 HS was unveiled 5 years after the EX-Z400 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Canon SX60 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the SX60 HS matches up versus the EX-Z400 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX60 HS and Casio Exilim EX-Z400. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX60 HS Gallery and Casio EX-Z400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX60 HS over the Casio EX-Z400
SX60 HS | EX-Z400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 70 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Canon SX60 HS
EX-Z400 | SX60 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX60 HS and Casio EX-Z400
SX60 HS | EX-Z400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX60 HS features physical measurements of 128mm x 93mm x 114mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 4.5") along with a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z400 has proportions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX60 HS versus Casio EX-Z400 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the SX60 HS against the EX-Z400.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abc02/abc02183737668b2243cfe17be2fa0a3d9ae919f" alt="Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 size comparison Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SX60 HS and EX-Z400 is 61 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbd8a/fbd8ac6657c746367d4fc728d43ee301d1809b5a" alt="Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 top view buttons comparison Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through specifications. The pic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX60 HS and EX-Z400.
To sum up, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Canon SX60 HS to provide you with greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger SX60 HS provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13af3/13af31bb52e0f9a5f3f50ee8ab438fcefb730f70" alt="Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 sensor size comparison Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d179a/d179a71adc3d682d4dbdbcd41e4e7d2d3d954115" alt="Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon SX60 HS vs Casio EX-Z400 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Casio |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX60 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2014-09-16 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 6 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-1365mm (65.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/2.6-7.0 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 922 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.4 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 650g (1.43 pounds) | 130g (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 128 x 93 x 114mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 4.5") | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 39 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 19.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 127 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-10L | NP-40 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $549 | $0 |