Canon PowerShot SX60 HS vs Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V: An Expert Comparative Review for Discerning Photographers

Selecting the right camera from the jungle of compact and bridge cameras often requires balancing multiple factors: sensor quality, zoom reach, ergonomics, and the intended photographic use. Today, we’re placing two formidable models side-by-side - the Canon PowerShot SX60 HS and the Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V - both released within a couple of years of each other but catering to very different segments of the market and photographic priorities.

Based on extensive hands-on testing, involving meticulous sensor benchmarking, autofocus performance trials, ergonomic assessments, and practical shooting under varied conditions, this article decodes how these two cameras compare head-to-head across a full spectrum of photography genres. We will also share detailed insights into their technological nuances, real-world usability, and value propositions.

First Impressions: Size, Form Factor & Ergonomics

At a glance, the Canon SX60 HS and Sony RX100 V present contrasting philosophies: the Canon is a bridge camera styled like a DSLR but with a fixed lens, while the Sony is a large sensor compact, aiming to marry performance with ultimate pocketability.

The SX60 HS measures approximately 128 x 93 x 114 mm and weighs 650 grams, exhibiting the heft and grip expected of a superzoom bridge camera, designed for users who prioritize zoom power and extended handling stability. Its substantial physical footprint includes a conventional DSLR-esque handgrip and a fully articulated 3-inch LCD screen with a resolution of 922k dots, enhancing compositional flexibility especially for video work and awkward angles.

In contrast, the RX100 V is strikingly compact at 102 x 58 x 41 mm and 299 grams, built for photographers who desire premium image quality in a pocketable form. Its tilting 3-inch screen boasts a higher resolution (1229k dots), although articulation is limited compared to the Canon’s articulated screen. The RX100 V features a more premium-feeling magnesium alloy body with tight tolerances favoring stealthy street shooting and travel convenience.

Both cameras have built-in electronic viewfinders, but the Sony’s OLED EVF outclasses the Canon’s LCD-based finder significantly in resolution (2359k vs 922k dots), eye relief, and color fidelity, vastly improving framing precision under bright outdoor conditions.

Ergonomic Notes:

• Canon’s physical controls - dials for PASM modes, zoom toggle near the shutter and a sizeable grip - make it more approachable for users who prefer tactile feedback and fast switching between settings.
• The Sony RX100 V is more minimalistic but compensates by packing numerous internal customizable function buttons and a control ring around the lens, allowing for quick manual adjustments despite its small size.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

The Canon SX60 HS sports a 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm producing 16 megapixels. This sensor size is typical for superzoom bridge cameras, offering a stupendous 65x zoom range (21-1365 mm equivalent) but with inherent compromises in image quality, particularly in noise performance and dynamic range.

In stark contrast, the Sony RX100 V features a substantially larger 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 13.2 x 8.8 mm and capturing 20 megapixels. The sensor area is over four times larger than Canon’s, which typically translates into significantly superior low-light capability, color depth, and finer detail rendering.

Technical Imaging Performance:

• DxOMark Scores: The RX100 V’s sensor scores a remarkable 70 overall, with a color depth of 22.8 bits and dynamic range of 12.4 EV, compared to Canon’s 39 overall, 19.2 bits color depth, and 10.1 EV dynamic range ratings.
• The Sony’s superior sensor size and back-illuminated design allow much cleaner images in high ISO settings, with usable image quality up to ISO 3200 and even moderate ISO 6400 pushes. The Canon trails with noisy results above ISO 800.
• Canon’s sensor is paired with DIGIC 6 processor; Sony’s Bionz X processor processes images almost twice as fast, helping with burst shooting and video.

Practical Visual Differences:

The Canon's images reveal acceptable detail at base ISO, but images become noticeably soft and noisy at higher ISOs, especially when shooting telephoto zoomed shots where diffraction and sensor noise compound. In comparison, the Sony RX100 V delivers crisp, clean images with more accurate colors and richer tonality - particularly evident in shadow recovery and highlight retention.

Lens and Zoom Versatility: Range vs. Brightness

The most obvious and defining advantage of the Canon SX60 HS lies in its astronomical 65x optical zoom (21-1365 mm equivalent), achievable through a fixed lens with an aperture range of f/3.4 to f/6.5. This makes it ideal for wildlife, sports at a distance, or any scenario demanding extreme telephoto reach without swapping lenses.

On the other hand, the Sony RX100 V has a modest 24-70 mm zoom range with a significantly faster aperture range from f/1.8 to f/2.8, classically suited for portraits, environmental shots, street photography, and low-light events where wide apertures bring decisive advantages.

While the RX100 V cannot compete with the SX60 HS in sheer focal length versatility, its lens optics offer sharp results edge-to-edge at all focal lengths, with minimal chromatic aberrations and exceptional control over bokeh quality due to the fast aperture design.

Macro Performance:

• The Canon’s fixed lens allows focusing down to 0 cm, indicating a very close-focus macro mode, but image quality is limited by sensor constraints.
• SONY’s RX100 V macro minimum focus distance is 5 cm, with impressive sharpness and shallow depth of field handling because of the large sensor and bright lens.

Autofocus, Burst Rates, and Shooting Speed: Capturing the Moment

Autofocus systems are arguably the backbone of user satisfaction for dynamic subjects across wildlife, sports, and street uses.

• The Canon SX60 HS employs a contrast-detect autofocus system with 9 focus points, face detection, and continuous AF tracking, but lacks phase detection. While sufficient for casual photography, autofocus performance is moderate and not highly responsive for subjects in motion.
• In contrast, the Sony RX100 V integrates a faster hybrid AF system combining phase-detection and contrast detection with a dense 315 AF points array. This facilitates speedy focus acquisition (~0.05s), precise tracking of moving subjects, and excellent eye detection, making it ideal for sports, wildlife, and street photography.

Burst Shooting:

• The Canon SX60 HS offers a continuous shooting speed of 6.4 fps, adequate for casual action but with limited buffer depth.
• The Sony RX100 V boasts an exceptional 24 fps burst rate with full AF/AE tracking and an expansive buffer, facilitating effective high-speed shooting of fast action sequences.

In real world testing, the RX100 V’s AF and burst capabilities make it a serious contender for capturing fleeting moments, whereas the Canon’s system works better in static or slower-moving scenarios.

Video Capabilities: 4K, Stabilization and Audio

Both cameras provide Full HD 1080p video recording but with notable differences:

• The Canon SX60 HS shoots Full HD at 60p and 30p in MPEG-4 and H.264 formats, featuring optical image stabilization to smooth handheld footage. Its articulating screen is beneficial for vlogging and creative angles. A microphone input is provided, a plus for those emphasizing audio quality.
• The Sony RX100 V advances significantly with 4K UHD video recording at 30p, recorded in the efficient XAVC S codec at 100 Mbps, and also supports Full HD 120p for slow-motion. Although lacking a microphone jack and headphone output, the RX100 V provides superb video quality, steady autofocus, and optical stabilization built into the lens.

Despite its tiny size, the RX100 V’s video features make it a hybrid powerhouse for mobile videographers, whereas the Canon, although capable, is constrained to older HD standards and lower bitrate recordings.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance

Neither the Canon SX60 HS nor the Sony RX100 V offers comprehensive environmental sealing, waterproofing, or freezeproofing - both are designed primarily as consumer-level devices rather than professional rugged systems.

• The Canon’s larger chassis tends to afford a more substantial feel and grip security useful for extended outdoor use, but lack of weather sealing limits its reliability in harsh weather.
• The Sony RX100 V’s metal chassis conveys premium build tolerance but should be handled prudently in rain or dusty environments.

Connectivity, Storage, and Battery Life

Connectivity options between both cameras exhibit similar mid-2010s features:

• Both cameras offer built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for quick pairing with mobile devices, enabling image transfer and remote control via smartphone apps.
• Canon uses USB 2.0 and HDMI, with no Bluetooth or GPS capabilities.
• Sony provides USB 2.0, HDMI output, and similarly lacks Bluetooth or GPS.

Battery life:

• Canon’s NB-10L battery rated at ~340 shots per charge (CIPA), exceeding Sony’s 220 shots rating on its NP-BX1 battery. However, real-world endurance will vary based on usage patterns, especially video recording and use of EVF.

Canon SX60 HS front Canon SX60 HS screen back Sony RX100 V front Sony RX100 V screen back

Practical Applications Across Photography Genres

Portrait Photography

The RX100 V’s larger, faster lens and superior autofocus, including precise eye and face detection, translate to more flattering skin tones, creamier bokeh, and overall superior portrait results - especially in controlled lighting or available light environments. The Canon, while serviceable, lacks the shallow depth of field and precise focusing finesse needed for professional-grade portraits.

Landscape Photography

Canon’s ultra-telephoto lens is less relevant here; the RX100 V’s higher resolution sensor (20MP vs 16MP), expanded dynamic range, and better RAW support enable richer detail and highlight/shadow preservation, integral to landscape imagery. The Canon’s smaller sensor struggles with noise in shadow regions, and lack of weather sealing is a concern for serious landscape shooters.

Wildlife and Sports

Extensive zoom range of the Canon SX60 HS gives it an edge for distant wildlife or casual sports spectatorship without investing in super-telephoto lenses. However, its slow autofocus and limited frame rates inhibit capturing fast-moving subjects sharply.

The Sony RX100 V, with rapid continuous shooting and sophisticated AF, excels at fast action but at the cost of limited zoom. Users may need to get physically closer or pair with a teleconverter lens on interchangeable systems to match zoom reach.

Street and Travel Photography

Sony’s RX100 V reigns supreme here due to compact size, discreet operation, excellent image quality in low light, and fast autofocus. Its lightweight design and weather resilience are convenient for travel. The Canon’s bulk and slow responsiveness reduce street shooting discretion.

Macro and Close-up

Canon’s near-zero focusing distance aids macro attempts but is foiled somewhat by image softness and sensor limits. Sony’s high resolution and sharp optics yield better fine detail capture in close-up, albeit with a minimum focusing distance of 5cm.

Night and Astrophotography

Sony’s larger sensor, superior ISO performance, and longer exposure capabilities make it suitable for astrophotography and night scenes. The Canon’s sensor noise at higher ISOs limits usefulness beyond moonlit or city-lit scenarios.

Professional Work

Sony’s superior image quality, flexibility in RAW handling, higher bit-depth, and faster data pipelines align better with professional workflows. Canon’s user interface is simpler but lacks professional-grade file formats (no mention of 14-bit RAW, for instance).

Summary of Technical Scores and Ratings

Genre-Specific Recommendations

• Portrait: Sony RX100 V
• Landscape: Sony RX100 V
• Wildlife: Canon SX60 HS (if zoom outranks AF speed)
• Sports: Sony RX100 V
• Street Photography: Sony RX100 V
• Macro: Sony RX100 V
• Night/Astro: Sony RX100 V
• Video: Sony RX100 V
• Travel: Sony RX100 V
• Professional Use: Sony RX100 V

Concluding Thoughts: Which Camera Serves Your Needs?

The Canon PowerShot SX60 HS proudly earns its keep as a superzoom bridge camera touted for vast focal length versatility and affordably priced near $550 at launch. For hobbyists needing a one-camera solution to capture everything from landscapes to distant wildlife at a reasonable cost, its straightforward controls, articulated screen, and built-in flash add practical value. However, image quality and autofocus performance fall short of today’s advanced compact systems, limiting its suitability for low-light and fast-action shooting.

Conversely, the Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V stands as a pinnacle in advanced compacts, providing exceptional image quality thanks to a very large 1-inch sensor and fast, sharp Zeiss lens. It excels in autofocus accuracy, burst speed, 4K video capture, and compactness - at a notably higher price point near $1000. Enthusiasts and professionals who demand a premium secondary or travel camera capable of high-quality images and video without having to lug lenses will find the RX100 V hard to beat.

Ultimately, if your priority is reach (extreme zoom) and budget, the Canon SX60 HS remains a compelling choice. If ultimate image quality, autofocus performance, video capabilities, and a compact form factor are paramount - and budget allows - the Sony RX100 V is the clear winner, equipped to satisfy serious enthusiasts and even professional needs in a pocketable shell.

This review reflects extensive independent testing under controlled and real-world conditions using industry-standard evaluation protocols, ensuring balanced insights to guide you in your camera purchasing decisions.

Thank you for reading this detailed comparative analysis. Please refer to the specifications tables, sample galleries, and scores images embedded within to further aid your choice.

Additional Resource

For hands-on users wanting further tactile insights, we recommend visiting a retail store to experience the size and control ergonomics firsthand, particularly to judge how either model fits your shooting style.

Images used in this article:

• size-comparison.jpg
• top-view-compare.jpg
• sensor-size-compare.jpg
• back-screen.jpg
• cameras-galley.jpg
• camera-scores.jpg
• photography-type-cameras-scores.jpg