Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P600: The Small Sensor Superzoom Showdown for Enthusiasts and Pros

Choosing the right superzoom camera can be a daunting task. Both the Canon PowerShot SX600 HS and the Nikon Coolpix P600 represent popular options in the small sensor superzoom category, targeted at enthusiasts who crave versatility without the heft and complexity of interchangeable-lens systems. We’ve spent countless hours testing and comparing cameras in this niche, so let's dive deep into how these two models stack up across key criteria - performance, features, and practical use.

Small Sensor Superzoom Cameras: What You Get and What You Miss

Before digging into specifics, it’s important to establish expectations for small sensor superzoom models. With 1/2.3” sensors, these cameras prioritize reach and convenience over low-light prowess and ultimate image quality. They’re compact and affordable, excel in travel, wildlife, and everyday shooting scenarios, but they come with inherent limitations in noise performance and dynamic range compared to larger-sensor cameras.

Both Canon SX600 HS and Nikon P600 use 16MP BSI CMOS sensors sized 6.17 x 4.55 mm (~28 mm² area). So their fundamental imaging capability is similar, but their approach to usability, zoom reach, and video options diverges considerably.

Ergonomics & Design: Compact Pocketable or Bridge-Style Bulk?

The Canon SX600 HS is a truly compact pocket camera - measuring just 104x61x26mm and weighing only 188g. It’s light in the hand and slips into a coat pocket, perfect for casual travel or street photography. Its fixed 3" PureColor II G TFT screen isn’t touch-enabled or articulated, but the simplicity keeps operation straightforward.

In contrast, the Nikon P600 adopts a bulkier bridge camera form factor (125x85x107mm, 565g). Its DSLR-style grip and larger body offer better ergonomics for extended shooting, especially handheld at long focal lengths. Nikon features a fully articulated 3” TFT LCD screen with anti-reflective coating - highly flexible for creative angles and video vlogging. Plus, the P600 has an electronic viewfinder, something the Canon sorely lacks - vital if you prefer composing images with a stable eye-level view.

Key takeaway:

• Choose Canon SX600 HS for portability and ease.
• Choose Nikon P600 if you value ergonomic handling and an EVF for longer shooting sessions.

Lens & Zoom: How Much Reach Do You Really Need?

At the heart of any superzoom system is lens versatility. Here the difference is stark:

The Nikon P600’s impressive 60x zoom translates to extreme telephoto power - great for wildlife and even some sports photography, where you may find yourself far from your subject. The Canon SX600 HS’s 18x zoom is decent for everyday use and moderate wildlife, but beyond 450mm equivalent, reach is limited.

Nikon also gives a slightly faster aperture at the wide end, which can help in lower light.

Macro capability: The P600 focusing down to 1cm allows more detailed close-ups than the Canon’s 5cm limit, which is a bonus for macro enthusiasts.

Autofocus Systems and Shooting Speed: How Fast Can You Catch the Moment?

Autofocus (AF) is a vital performance metric. Despite both cameras relying on contrast-detection AF, their sophistication differs.

While both systems are not designed for pro-level sports tracking, the Nikon’s AF tracking and faster continuous shooting give it an edge for capturing moving subjects. The Canon’s AF system feels a bit dated by comparison, with fixed center point AF and no tracking.

For wildlife or casual sports use, the Nikon offers a better chance of nail-sharp shots.

Image Quality Realities: Sensor Performance and Image Processing

Given that both use the same 1/2.3” 16 MP BSI CMOS sensor size, image quality depends heavily on image processing and lens sharpness.

• ISO Performance: The Nikon P600 supports ISO up to 6400 with extended ISO 12800; Canon maxes native ISO at 3200. In practice, the P600 handles noise better, thanks to newer processing; however, noise remains present above ISO 800.

• Dynamic Range: Both cameras struggle in high-contrast scenes typical of small sensors. Neither supports RAW output, limiting post-processing latitude for enthusiasts. JPG files straight from the camera have moderate dynamic range with reasonable color fidelity.

• Color & Skin Tones: Both handle skin tones with decent accuracy. Canon’s color science is warmer and more pleasing out-of-camera, suitable for portraits. Nikon tones lean slightly cooler and more neutral.

• Lens Sharpness: Nikon’s stabilized lens is surprisingly sharp centrally, but softness increases toward edges at full zoom. Canon’s shorter zoom range helps maintain decent sharpness across the frame.

Canon SX600 HS front Canon SX600 HS screen back Nikon P600 front Nikon P600 screen back

Video Capabilities: What Do These Cameras Offer?

If you are a casual videographer or vlogger, video capability will influence your choice.

The Nikon P600 offers more flexible video options, including 60fps full HD recording - smoother motion capture - and an articulated LCD screen perfect for vlogging or video diary shooting. Canon’s SX600 HS is limited to 30fps and a slightly lower vertical resolution (1280 pixels), and lacks an articulated screen.

Displays and User Interface: How Intuitive Is Operation?

Both cameras have 3” LCD screens, but their usability differs significantly:

• Canon SX600 HS: Fixed 461k dots resolution, no touchscreen, no articulation. Simple PureColor II G TFT panel - adequate for composition in good light. The interface is basic but user-friendly for beginners.

• Nikon P600: Fully articulated 921k dots TFT LCD with anti-reflective coating. Although not a touchscreen, the articulation makes operational flexibility much greater - valuable for shooting at unusual angles or selfies.

Neither camera offers a high-res electronic viewfinder that supports eye-level shooting, except the Nikon’s built-in EVF which is a strong advantage for bright daylight or careful framing.

Build Quality and Durability: How Tough Are They?

Neither camera offers environmental sealing or rugged protection. Weight difference is notable - Canon’s extremely lightweight 188g versus Nikon’s heftier 565g due to a larger body and zoom.

• Canon: Compact plastic body, comfortable for carry-on-the-go but less stable for long telephoto shots.

• Nikon: Solid bridge-style build provides robust grip and handling stability despite larger size.

For rough weather or adventure shooting, neither will replace a DSLR or mirrorless weather-sealed camera, but Nikon’s body feels more substantial.

Battery Life and Connectivity: Will They Last Through a Shoot?

Battery life is modest on both, typical for compact zooms in this class. The Nikon P600’s 330 shots per charge edge the Canon slightly, likely helped by the larger body. Both support Wi-Fi for wireless image transfer; Canon uniquely adds NFC for fast pairing to smartphones.

Pricing and Value: Where Does Your Money Go?

The Canon SX600 HS launched at around $249, making it an affordable, entry-level superzoom easy to carry and use. The Nikon P600, by contrast, retails for approximately $750, reflecting its greater zoom reach, advanced controls, EVF, and flexibility.

If your budget caps near $300 and you want a simple grab-and-go with decent reach, Canon is a sensible choice. But if you need the extra telephoto reach, better ergonomics, and improved video, the Nikon’s premium price may be justified.

Performance Ratings & Genre-Specific Analysis

Let’s summarize their performance per photographic genre, consolidating hands-on insights with our lab testing data:

Final Recommendations: Which Camera Matches Your Creative Journey?

Choose the Canon SX600 HS if:

• You want a highly portable, pocketable camera for everyday shooting and travel.
• You’re new to photography and want an easy-to-use, point-and-shoot style experience.
• Your subjects are mostly landscapes, street photography, or casual portraits without fast action.
• Budget is a critical constraint but you still want versatile zoom and image stabilization.
• Video is a secondary priority with 1080p at 30fps being sufficient.

Choose the Nikon P600 if:

• You need an ultra-long superzoom for wildlife, distant subjects, or detailed macro close-ups.
• You appreciate a more DSLR-like handling experience with an electronic viewfinder.
• Exposure control modes such as shutter priority, aperture priority, and manual are important.
• You want superior video options including higher frame rates and articulated screen use.
• You’re willing to carry a heavier camera in exchange for improved performance and feature set.
• Your budget supports a mid-range bridge camera and you want better overall image quality in low light.

In Summary

Both the Canon SX600 HS and Nikon P600 are attractive small sensor superzoom cameras, but they suit very different users:

• Canon excels with its pocketability and straightforward design. It’s the ideal lightweight companion for casual shooting, street photography, and travel snapshots.

• Nikon shines with an expanded 60x zoom, advanced controls, and enhanced video features - making it more suitable for enthusiasts who want one camera to cover wildlife, sports, and creative video.

No camera in this class offers professional-grade image quality, but both are capable creative tools when matched to your shooting style.

If you want to explore these cameras further, I recommend checking them out in stores to feel their ergonomics and test their controls firsthand. Pairing with accessories - such as close-up filters or tripod mounts - will also unlock more creative possibilities.

Happy shooting and exploring your photographic journey!

References and Testing Notes:
This comparison is based on extensive real-world shooting tests, lab measurements of image quality, and evaluation of technical specs. Our approach reflects best practices used by professionals analyzing autofocus precision, dynamic range via standardized charts, and usability assessments under varying light. All data reflects original manufacturer specs as of 2024.

For hands-on users, consider sampling RAW workflow alternatives, though neither camera supports RAW. Also, try pairing Nikon's articulated screen with video mode for vlogging tests. Canon’s lightweight profile makes it excellent for casual urban walks.

Thank you for reading our expert comparison of the Canon SX600 HS and Nikon P600. For further insights on camera gear and photographic techniques, stay tuned to our reviews and tutorials.