Canon PowerShot SX700 HS vs Olympus TG-310: A Detailed Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts

When stepping into the world of compact cameras, especially superzooms and rugged models, it’s essential to understand what you’re really getting beyond just specs on paper. Today, I’m putting two cameras through their paces - the Canon PowerShot SX700 HS, a small sensor superzoom compact, and the Olympus TG-310, a waterproof rugged compact. Both have their appeal, but serve quite different photographic needs. Drawing on years of hands-on testing and thousands of cameras reviewed, I’ll help you navigate which might suit your style, needs, and budget.

Let’s dive into an honest, in-depth comparison of these two cameras considering real-world use cases, image quality, operational performance, and value.

First Impressions: Design, Ergonomics, and Handling

Canon SX700 HS is a traditional compact with a relatively larger footprint among small sensor compacts – measuring 113x66x35mm and weighing 269g. Compared to the far smaller and lighter Olympus TG-310, which measures just 96x63x23mm and weighs 155g, the Canon handles more like a mini DSLR in the hand.

The Canon’s larger size accommodates a longer zoom lens and more extensive controls. The TG-310’s ultra-compact dimensions make it a true grab-and-go, ideal for underwater and rough terrain usage where minimal bulk is a plus.

In handling tests, I found the Canon’s grip more secure and its buttons easier to access. The TG-310, while compact, feels a little cramped during prolonged shooting but excels in portability where size and weight are constraints.

Control Layout and Ease of Use

From a control standpoint, the Canon SX700 HS is better equipped for full manual control with dedicated exposure modes including shutter priority, aperture priority, full manual, and exposure compensation. Olympus TG-310, conversely, offers largely automatic shooting with no manual exposure control and fewer customizable buttons.

The Canon’s top plate shows a mode dial, zoom lever, and a well-placed shutter button, facilitating quick adjustments. Olympus adopts a minimalist interface, aligning with its rugged, “point-and-shoot” philosophy.

For photographers looking for creative control and manual tweaking, the Canon clearly provides more flexibility. The Olympus will suit casual shooters favoring simplicity and quick operation.

Sensor Technology: Impact on Image Quality

Both cameras house 1/2.3-inch sensors, a common but relatively small size in the compact market. The Canon features a 16MP BSI-CMOS sensor paired with the DIGIC 6 processor, while the Olympus relies on a 14MP CCD sensor with a TruePic III+ processor.

Here’s where that combination matters:

• Canon SX700 HS: The BSI-CMOS sensor is a back-illuminated design that improves low light capability by collecting more photons. The DIGIC 6 processor enhances image noise reduction and delivers faster processing speeds. This combination typically yields better dynamic range, color fidelity, and noise handling - something I witnessed in low-light and high-contrast scenes during my hands-on testing.

• Olympus TG-310: The CCD sensor, while capable, lags behind in low light and dynamic range. I observed noisier images and limited flexibility to recover shadows. The aging TruePic III+ processor struggles compared to modern chips, which impacts image quality and battery efficiency.

While neither sensor will rival APS-C or full-frame systems, the Canon edge gives it better overall image quality potential, especially beyond bright daylight. If image quality and low-light performance matter most, the Canon wins here.

Rear LCD Screen and Viewfinder Experience

Both cameras lack electronic viewfinders, typical for compacts in this class. That places importance on the rear LCD screen.

• The Canon sports a 3-inch Fixed Type PureColor II G TFT with a sharp 922k-dot resolution. It provides vibrant color reproduction and decent visibility even in outdoor daylight. While lacking touch capability, the interface is intuitive, letting me navigate menus and playback efficiently.

• Olympus TG-310 uses a smaller 2.7-inch TFT LCD at just 230k dots, noticeably lower resolution. This means less precise framing and less comfortable image review, especially outdoors.

For composition accuracy and menu navigation, Canon’s screen offers a clear advantage. If you’re venturing outdoors a lot or want better live view, the SX700 HS is more pleasing.

Exploring Photography Genres: Real-World Performance

To understand which camera suits what shooting style, I tested them across multiple photography types. Here’s what I found.

Portrait Photography: Skin Tones and Bokeh

Portrait shooters value accurate skin tones, selective focus, and pleasing bokeh (background blur).

• Canon SX700 HS: The 30x zoom (25-750mm equivalent) and max aperture of f/3.2-6.9 provide some compositional flexibility, though background blur is limited due to sensor size. Still, the lens and subject separation combined with Canon's color science render natural skin tones. The SX700 HS incorporates face detection autofocus, which worked well in locking onto faces for sharp results in various light conditions.

• Olympus TG-310: Shorter zoom range (28-102mm equivalent) and the even narrower aperture (f/3.9-5.9) limit background blur capacity. The face detection was present but slower and less accurate. Skin tones tended to be cooler and somewhat less natural, which is common with CCD sensors and Olympus color profile on this model.

For portraits, Canon’s SX700 HS provides a more refined tool despite no portrait-specific modes. If portraits are a key focus, it’s the superior choice.

Landscape: Resolution, Dynamic Range, and Weatherproofing

Landscape photography demands high resolution, dynamic range, and ideally weather sealing.

• Both cameras share a similar sensor size and megapixels (Canon 16MP vs Olympus 14MP), adequate for casual landscape shots but not fine art prints beyond 8x10 inches.

• The Canon’s BSI-CMOS sensor and DIGIC 6 processor handle high contrast scenes better, preserving shadow and highlight details in tricky lighting. Olympus struggles with dynamic range leading to clipped highlights or crushed shadows.

• The Olympus TG-310 shines in weather sealing, being waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, and freezeproof. It’s rated rugged - perfect for harsh outdoor conditions where the Canon’s compact but not weathersealed body cannot go.

The landscape choice depends on where and how you shoot:

• For studio-like, planned landscape shoots prioritizing image quality, choose the Canon.
• For adventure or inclement weather landscape photography, TG-310’s durability is invaluable.

Wildlife Photography: Zoom Reach and Autofocus

Wildlife photography often requires fast AF, superior reach, and burst performance:

• The Canon SX700 HS boasts an impressive 30x optical zoom (25-750mm equivalent) - a standout in this category. Its contrast-detection AF with face detection may be a bit slow compared to DSLRs or mirrorless but sufficient for casual wildlife.

• Olympus TG-310 has a modest 3.6x zoom (28-102mm equivalent) and slower contrast AF with no continuous shooting (1 fps only). It’s not designed for action.

• The SX700 HS supports 9 fps continuous shooting, letting you capture fleeting wildlife moments better.

If wildlife photography is your focus, especially birding, the Canon is far superior thanks to telephoto reach and faster burst rate.

Sports Photography: Autofocus Tracking and Frame Rates

Fast autofocus and high burst rates are crucial for sports:

• Canon SX700 HS’s 9 fps continuous shooting is competent for entry-level sports capture. Subject tracking is basic contrast detect without phase detection, so fast-moving subjects may occasionally be missed. Still, I managed decent sequences in amateur sporting events.

• Olympus TG-310 is limited to 1 fps with no continuous AF or tracking capability, clearly unsuitable for most sports.

Here the Canon is the practical, if limited, choice for casual sports shooters.

Street Photography: Size, Discreteness, and Low Light

Street photographers favor small size, quiet operation, and low-light performance:

• Olympus TG-310’s compact, rugged body and quiet operation make it ideal for candid street shots, especially in variable weather.

• Canon’s larger size and louder zoom/mechanics are less ideal for subtle shooting but benefits from better low-light sensitivity thanks to the BSI sensor and image stabilization.

If you prioritize discretion and ruggedness, TG-310 works better, but for dimmer scenes, the Canon holds an advantage.

Macro Photography: Minimum Focus Distance and Stabilization

Both cameras offer macro shooting abilities:

• Canon SX700 HS boasts a 1cm macro focus minimum distance, impressive for a superzoom, coupled with optical image stabilization helping handheld close-ups.

• Olympus TG-310 focuses to 3cm and uses sensor-shift stabilization. Its smaller zoom range limits magnification but still capably shoots close subjects.

For higher magnification and sharper macro shots, I recommend the Canon.

Night and Astrophotography: ISO and Exposure Modes

Low-light and night shots stress sensor sensitivity and exposure flexibility:

• Canon’s max ISO 3200 and inclusion of shutter/aperture priority and manual mode allow more creative control in night scenes.

• Olympus TG-310 maxes at ISO 1600 with no manual modes, severely limiting night shooting capability.

In my night star tests, the Canon reasonably handled stars and urban night scenes better, though neither replaced a good tripod-mounted larger sensor camera.

Video Capabilities and Stabilization

Video specs can be a deciding factor:

• Canon SX700 HS offers Full HD 1080p at 60fps with H.264 compression, optical image stabilization, and HDMI output - suitable for casual to semi-pro video work.

• Olympus TG-310 records HD 720p at 30fps in Motion JPEG format, resulting in larger files and lower video quality.

Neither has microphone/ headphone jacks, so external audio is limited.

Canon’s video capabilities noticeably outperform Olympus.

Travel Gear: Size, Versatility, and Battery Life

Travel shooting demands a balance of image quality, ruggedness, and convenience:

• Olympus TG-310’s rugged waterproof design at 155g and tiny size makes it perfect for adventurous travelers transitioning between beach, trail, and city - one less thing to worry about.

• Canon SX700 HS, though larger and heavier, delivers wider focal length range, better photo quality, and longer battery life (250 shots vs 150 shots).

If your trip includes rugged conditions, TG-310 is reassuringly durable. For diverse shooting styles where image quality and zoom from landscapes to portraits matter, the Canon is preferred.

Professional Use: File Format and Workflow

Both cameras are consumer compacts; neither supports raw file capture which limits professional workflow flexibility.

Canon’s advanced controls offer modest creative freedom, but files are limited to JPEG, constraining post-processing.

Olympus offers fewer manual options and even less creative control.

Neither camera is ideal for professional applications requiring extensive editing or high image fidelity.

Technical Performance and Build Quality Summary

Sample Image Comparisons

Canon SX700 HS screen back Olympus TG 310 front Olympus TG 310 screen back

Reviewing side-by-side sample images, the Canon’s superior sharpness, color accuracy, and dynamic range are evident. The Olympus photos tend to have a softer look with cooler color tones. In macro and telephoto shots, Canon’s greater zoom and sharpness stand out, while Olympus captures usable, though more limited images.

Overall Performance Scores at a Glance

The Canon SX700 HS scores higher overall due to image quality, zoom range, and control options. Olympus TG-310’s strengths lie primarily in ruggedness and portability, pulling it into a separate niche.

Specific Genre Scores Breakdown

• Portrait & Wildlife: Canon leads with zoom and AF precision.
• Landscape: Tie on resolution, but Canon’s sensor favored.
• Sports & Action: Canon far ahead with burst and AF.
• Street & Travel: Olympus rated higher for rugged travel usage.
• Night & Macro: Canon has the technical edge.

Who Should Buy Which Camera?

Buy the Canon PowerShot SX700 HS if:

• You want a versatile everyday camera with extensive zoom and manual controls
• Image quality and low light performance are priorities
• You shoot portraits, wildlife, landscapes, or casual sports
• Video recording at Full HD 1080p matters
• You are comfortable carrying a slightly larger compact

Buy the Olympus TG-310 if:

• You need a rugged, waterproof camera for adventurous outdoor use
• Portability and durability outweigh zoom capability
• You prefer a simple, point-and-shoot interface
• Image quality and video are secondary to reliability in rough conditions
• Budget is a strong concern (TG-310 often found at lower cost)

Final Thoughts: Balancing Quality and Durability

This comparison highlights a common fact: no compact camera perfectly balances top image quality, extensive manual control, and rugged durability. The Canon PowerShot SX700 HS excels as a versatile imaging tool with significant zoom, decent handling, and respectable image quality given the small sensor. Meanwhile, the Olympus TG-310 thrives as a tough companion for unpredictable environments where damage risk is high.

For photographers seeking a primary compact with creative flexibility and image quality, Canon is the better choice. For those whose priority is a durable “take anywhere” camera that just works under pressure, Olympus fits the bill.

Both cameras have aged as newer models have improved sensors and features, but they still hold relevance for budget-conscious buyers targeting specific needs.

Methodology and Testing Notes

My evaluations involved:

• Outdoor shooting simulating real environments (portrait sessions, landscape hikes, night cityscapes)
• Lab tests for sensor performance where feasible
• Comparing autofocus speed and accuracy on moving subjects
• Side-by-side image comparisons using raw JPEG output from both cameras
• Testing ergonomics across multi-hour shooting periods
• Video recording under daylight and low light conditions

This approach ensures the strengths and limitations reflect practical experience, not just specs.

To Wrap Up: What Matters Most to You?

Ultimately, your decision should be guided by:

• What type of photography do you prioritize?
• Is weight or ruggedness essential?
• How important is zoom reach or manual control?
• Budget considerations and longevity of use

If you value image quality and zoom - go Canon SX700 HS.
If ruggedness and portability top the list - Olympus TG-310 is the safe bet.

I hope this comprehensive, experience-based comparison steers you clearly toward the camera that suits your photographic journey best.

For further reading and real user feedback, I recommend cross-checking recent user reviews and testing any camera in-store if possible. Happy shooting!

End of Article