Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8000
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75375/7537523d320c2bfccd4e37a12f883cfcd9ded6c0" alt="Casio Exilim EX-10 front Casio Exilim EX-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e541/6e541f13ef88ea0ca8eaf6180c7a6a686d0521cf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Revealed November 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 8000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the 8000 (12MP) is pretty well matched but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and 8000 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The EX-10 was revealed 4 years later than the 8000 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-10 scores vs the 8000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Olympus 8000
EX-10 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 54 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Casio EX-10
8000 | EX-10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Olympus 8000
EX-10 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-10 has physical measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Olympus 8000 has specifications of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-10 compared to the 8000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/364fd/364fdeac17277ffe294bb5d065143cb4f372b7c4" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8000 size comparison Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8000 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and 8000 is 83 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b698/2b698e05178551d4bbad93a22078e2d2e5381e74" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The graphic here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-10 and 8000.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have the same MP albeit not the same sensor measurements. The EX-10 uses the bigger sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field easier. The more recent EX-10 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16800/16800bdc8b5e8417b24ddcdd6d63f3061ae00eb3" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d4a2/8d4a2f4a7935212deafedda658552a121fccfa46" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
Also called | - | mju Tough 8000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-11-14 | 2009-07-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 2cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 250 secs | 1/4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.90 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 384g (0.85 lb) | 182g (0.40 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 455 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-130A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $456 | $380 |