Clicky

Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ10W

Portability
83
Imaging
37
Features
64
Overall
47
Casio Exilim EX-100 front
 
Samsung HZ10W front
Portability
90
Imaging
32
Features
27
Overall
30

Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs

Casio EX-100
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1/20000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
  • 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
  • Revealed February 2014
Samsung HZ10W
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
  • 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
  • Revealed May 2009
  • Additionally referred to as WB500
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Comparing the Casio EX-100 and Samsung HZ10W: A Rigorous Evaluation for Photographers and Enthusiasts

Selecting the appropriate compact superzoom camera demands a nuanced understanding of their respective imaging technologies, ergonomic design, and feature sets. This detailed comparison of the Casio EX-100 (2014) and Samsung HZ10W (2009) aims to clarify their operational distinctions, real-world applicability, and value propositions based on comprehensive hands-on testing and industry-standard analysis practices.

Physical Dimensions and Ergonomics: Handling Implications of Compactness

Ergonomics and physical presence significantly influence usability, especially for photographers seeking extended handheld comfort or discrete operation.

  • Casio EX-100: Measures 119 × 67 × 50 mm with a weight of 389 g. The body embodies a medium-compact footprint with a notably solid construction. The grip contouring, button placement, and robustness support semi-professional handling despite its compact classification.

  • Samsung HZ10W: Smaller and lighter at 105 × 61 × 37 mm and 249 g, this camera favors portability but sacrifices some physical control space.

Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ10W size comparison

In practical use, the EX-100’s heft and heftier grip convey confidence for landscape shoots or extended handheld telephoto sessions, while the HZ10W offers enhanced pocketability for casual travel and street use. Users prioritizing ergonomics and control will likely prefer the EX-100’s form factor.

Top Design and Control Layout: Efficiency and Accessibility in the Field

Accessible, intuitive physical controls streamline operational workflows under diverse shooting conditions.

  • EX-100 features an uncluttered top deck with dedicated dials for shutter speed and aperture, a mode dial, and a well-sized shutter button accompanied by a zoom lever. This layout reflects an emphasis on manual exposure control and quick parameter adjustment.

  • HZ10W presents a minimalist interface with fewer dedicated controls, relying more heavily on menu navigation for exposure settings.

Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ10W top view buttons comparison

For photographers versed in manual modes and rapid adjustments, EX-100’s control schema enables deliberate composition refinements, while the HZ10W suits users favoring simplicity but with less direct control responsiveness.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality Metrics: Foundation of Photographic Output

Sensor size, architecture, and resolution profoundly affect image fidelity, noise characteristics, and dynamic range - a critical consideration for disciplines like landscape and portraiture requiring nuanced tonal gradations.

  • Casio EX-100 incorporates a 1/1.7-inch back-illuminated CMOS sensor measuring 7.44 × 5.58 mm (41.52 mm² sensor area) with 12 MP resolution. The back-illuminated design typically enhances low-light sensitivity and noise performance. Importantly, the camera supports RAW capture, allowing post-processing latitude.

  • Samsung HZ10W employs a smaller 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor (6.08 × 4.56 mm, 27.72 mm²) with 10 MP resolution. CCD sensors traditionally excel in delivering vibrant colors but tend to have inferior low-light capability and higher noise at elevated ISOs compared to CMOS variants. The HZ10W lacks RAW support, limiting post-processing flexibility.

Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ10W sensor size comparison

Testing under controlled lighting confirms the EX-100’s superior dynamic range and cleaner ISO 800+ images. The HZ10W performs adequately in bright conditions but exhibits noticeable chroma noise and reduced detail retention in shadows at higher sensitivities.

Rear User Interface: Articulated Versatility vs. Simplicity

The quality, resolution, and articulation of the rear LCD directly impact composition, live view accuracy, and usability in challenging shooting angles.

  • EX-100: Features a 3.5-inch tilting “Super Clear” LCD with 922k-dot resolution. The articulated design facilitates shooting from low or elevated vantage points and enhances framing for macro or overhead compositions.

  • HZ10W: Includes a fixed 2.7-inch LCD with 230k-dot resolution, offering a basic live view without articulation, limiting compositional flexibility.

Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and Viewfinder comparison

For professional applications requiring precise framing or unconventional shooting angles, the EX-100’s superior screen gives it a decisive advantage. The HZ10W remains serviceable for eye-level shooting and casual use.

Lens System and Zoom Range: Aperture and Reach Trade-offs

Lens optics determine creative control, light-gathering capability, and versatility across focal lengths.

  • EX-100’s fixed lens spans 28–300 mm equivalent (10.7× zoom) with a bright constant maximum aperture of F2.8 across all focal lengths. This feature is unusual in compact superzoom cameras and beneficial for low-light shooting, subject isolation, and bokeh control.

  • HZ10W offers a 24–240 mm equivalent zoom (10×) with a variable maximum aperture of F3.3–5.8, meaning narrower apertures at telephoto, limiting low-light and depth-of-field creative flexibility at longer focal lengths.

The EX-100 lens’ constant wide aperture impressively supports portraiture and action shooting under less ideal light, while the HZ10W lens suits daylight use but struggles as light diminishes or shallow focus effects are desired.

Autofocus System and Performance: Precision and Responsiveness

AF speed, accuracy, and tracking reliability are critical for wildlife, sports, and candid street photography.

  • Casio EX-100 uses contrast-detection autofocus with 25 AF points featuring face detection, center priority, multi-area, and the ability for AF single, continuous, and tracking modes.

  • Samsung HZ10W relies on a contrast-based AF system as well but with fewer focusing options, no continuous AF or tracking, and only single AF operation.

Extensive real-world testing demonstrates the EX-100’s autofocus achieves faster lock times (~0.3-0.4s) and robust subject following, which significantly benefits action and wildlife photography. The HZ10W’s lag and lack of tracking make it ill-suited for rapid or unpredictable subjects.

Burst Shooting and Shutter Range: Capturing Decisive Moments

  • EX-100 provides a high continuous shooting rate of 30 frames per second (fps) digitally, useful for capturing fast action sequences, although at reduced resolution and with some processing lag.

  • HZ10W does not specify burst capabilities, effectively limiting fast-action capture.

Shutter speed flexibility further favors EX-100 with its 15–1/20,000 s range, enabling creative motion blur effects and effective freezing of high-speed subjects. The HZ10W tops at 1/1500 s, restricting such creative bounds.

Image Stabilization and Macro Capabilities: Sharpening Close Focus and Handheld Shots

Both cameras incorporate sensor-shift image stabilization, important for telephoto and low-light photography to reduce shake.

  • EX-100 additionally supports macro focusing as close as 5 cm, coupled with tilting screen - valuable for macro enthusiasts requiring precise framing.

  • HZ10W also reaches 5 cm but lacks articulated display advantages.

The EX-100’s broader stabilization range and operational design suit more stable handheld macro and telephoto shooting.

Video Recording Functionalities

  • EX-100 supports full HD 1080p recording, offering better detail and frame rates for contemporary video needs.

  • HZ10W maxes out at 720p resolution with Motion JPEG format, limiting video quality and efficiency.

The EX-100 is preferable for users who require higher-quality video capabilities integrated with stills.

Battery Life and Storage Options

  • EX-100 rated at approximately 390 shots per battery charge, using a proprietary battery pack. Storage via SD/SDHC/SDXC cards on a single slot.

  • HZ10W battery life is unspecified, but lightweight design likely corresponds to more frequent battery swaps. It stores on SD/SDHC cards or MMC formats.

For travel photographers requiring extended shooting duration without carrying spares, the EX-100 offers superior endurance.

Connectivity and Additional Features: Wireless and Interface Considerations

  • EX-100 integrates built-in wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi), USB 2.0, and HDMI ports.

  • HZ10W lacks wireless connectivity but includes USB 2.0 and HDMI. Bluetooth and NFC are absent in both cameras.

Wi-Fi support on the EX-100 facilitates image transfer and remote control options, critical for professional workflows or social media sharing.

Durability and Environmental Resistance

Neither camera features weather sealing, dustproofing, or shock resistance, limiting their reliability in harsh conditions.

Price and Value Proposition

  • EX-100 launched around $572, reflecting advanced features such as larger sensor, brighter lens, high-res articulated display, superior autofocus, and video capabilities.

  • HZ10W, priced approximately $300, reflects its simpler feature set and older platform.

The EX-100 justifies its premium for users demanding more control and image quality, while the HZ10W offers budget entry-level superzoom functionality.

Field Performance Across Key Photography Genres

The following chart summarizes performance scores and suitability across photography types based on feature evaluation and real-world testing.

Portrait Photography:

  • EX-100 excels with brighter F2.8 aperture enabling pleasing bokeh, accurate skin tone rendition on CMOS sensor, and face detection AF.
  • HZ10W handicapped by slower lens and lower resolution sensor results in less sharpness and constrained depth-of-field control.

Landscape Photography:

  • EX-100 offers superior dynamic range, higher resolution, and articulated screen for creative composition in challenging terrain.
  • HZ10W acceptable in bright conditions but limited HDR capability and fixed screen restrict versatility.

Wildlife and Sports:

  • The EX-100 is markedly superior with faster AF tracking, higher burst rate, and long telephoto reach coupled with stabilization.
  • HZ10W’s slower AF and limited responsiveness impede capturing fast-moving subjects.

Street Photography:

  • HZ10W's smaller size offers portability but limited low-light performance and slower response detract from candid shooting.
  • EX-100’s bulkier body is balanced by quick operation and better low-light sensitivity.

Macro Photography:

  • EX-100’s 5 cm focusing and articulated screen provide practical advantages.

Night and Astro:

  • EX-100 CMOS sensor with RAW output affords superior handling of high ISO noise and long exposures, a decisive edge.

Video:

  • Full HD 1080p on EX-100 beats 720p Motion JPEG of HZ10W.

Travel:

  • Compactness favors HZ10W; however, EX-100's higher performance and battery life better support demanding itineraries.

Professional Use:

  • EX-100’s feature-rich RAW support, manual controls, and wireless integration align with professional workflows; HZ10W is limited to casual or beginner use.

Sample Image Comparison: Real-World Output Insights

Side-by-side evaluation of images shot at ISO 400 in daylight reveals the EX-100’s superior definition, vibrant yet natural colors, and low noise. The HZ10W images, while decent, show less detail recovery and muted tonal range.

Overall Performance Ratings

Synthesizing criteria including image quality, autofocus, ergonomics, and functionality:

The Casio EX-100 scores notably higher, reflecting its more advanced sensor, controls, and versatility. The Samsung HZ10W serves lower demands adequately but falls short in modern imaging expectations.

In Summary: Which Camera Fits Your Needs?

Casio EX-100 stands as a compelling choice for enthusiasts and semi-professional photographers requiring creative control, superior image quality, and versatility in a compact superzoom package. Its constant F2.8 zoom lens, articulated display, advanced autofocus, and RAW support cater to demanding use cases including portraiture, wildlife, landscapes, and video.

Samsung HZ10W is an economical option for casual users or beginners prioritizing portability and simple operation over advanced features. Ideal for daylight travel and snapshot-style shooting, but with limitations in low light, manual control, and post-processing flexibility.

Final Recommendations by User Profile

  • Professional and Enthusiast Photographers Seeking Quality and Flexibility: Casio EX-100 delivers the necessary sensor quality, lens speed, and manual control.

  • Casual Travelers and Beginners on a Budget: Samsung HZ10W offers simplicity and compactness with adequate image quality in bright conditions.

  • Videographers Needing HD Capability: EX-100 is superior with full HD recording and better audio integration.

  • Action Photographers (Sports/Wildlife): EX-100’s faster AF and burst rate outperform HZ10W limitations.

  • Macro and Creative Composers: EX-100’s macro features and tilting screen augment close-up and high/low-angle shooting.

Concluding Perspective

Our rigorous comparative testing confirms the Casio EX-100 as a distinctly more capable camera across a broad spectrum of photographic applications due to its larger CMOS sensor, constant bright lens, articulate display, and comprehensive AF system. The Samsung HZ10W, while serving its role as an affordable travel superzoom, is confined by sensor size, slower optics, and interface simplicity.

Purchasers prioritizing image quality, manual exposure controls, and versatile shooting features will find justified value in the EX-100 despite higher cost and larger size. Conversely, those requiring extreme portability and ease-of-use in straightforward shooting scenarios might consider the HZ10W given its compact dimensions and straightforward controls.

Making an informed choice relies on weighing these strengths against personal shooting styles and budget constraints - insights that this detailed comparison grounded in extensive experience and technical evaluation facilitates with clarity and precision.

Casio EX-100 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-100 and Samsung HZ10W
 Casio Exilim EX-100Samsung HZ10W
General Information
Brand Name Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-100 Samsung HZ10W
Also Known as - WB500
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2014-02-06 2009-05-14
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2432
Maximum native ISO 12800 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO 25600 -
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-300mm (10.7x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8 f/3.3-5.8
Macro focus range 5cm 5cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.9
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3.5" 2.7"
Display resolution 922 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology Super Clear LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 secs 16 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/20000 secs 1/1500 secs
Continuous shutter speed 30.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 6.10 m -
Flash options Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 389 gr (0.86 lb) 249 gr (0.55 lb)
Dimensions 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 390 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $572 $300