Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL350
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83032/830322c2f55e8e7b440b8ff2f88d5aa93903532c" alt="Casio Exilim EX-100 front Casio Exilim EX-100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2103a/2103adbddc269259d95545a9af4d247992bac1f0" alt="Samsung TL350 front Samsung TL350 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally Known as WB2000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Here is a thorough assessment of the Casio EX-100 and Samsung TL350, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the TL350 (10MP) is fairly close but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and TL350 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The EX-100 was announced 4 years later than the TL350 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-100 matches up vs the TL350 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Samsung TL350. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung TL350
EX-100 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 49 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Casio EX-100
TL350 | EX-100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung TL350
EX-100 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-100 comes with external measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Samsung TL350 has measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-100 and Samsung TL350 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the EX-100 compared to the TL350.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/507a6/507a60a5092127fafec2f7f7fa0abfe3e5ee6944" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and TL350 is 83 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5956c/5956cc4fe16505adc3356a834ae6e884910d6a75" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing only by researching technical specs. The graphic below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-100 and TL350.
As you have seen, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-100 having a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Casio EX-100 will render more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The fresher EX-100 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccf20/ccf2082e9cae6bac898d57f2ae0405ed3b6dc755" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/243c6/243c67b8df0d1efbf873aa9afe41f8e85d0ce7a8" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung TL350 |
Also called | - | WB2000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-02-06 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 922k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.10 m | 5.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 389g (0.86 pounds) | 195g (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $572 | $400 |