Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB35F
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and WB35F (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-100 was manufactured very close to the WB35F and they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-100 scores against the WB35F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung WB35F
| EX-100 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-100
| WB35F | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung WB35F
| EX-100 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | January 2014 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-100 enjoys physical measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB35F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-100 vs the WB35F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and WB35F is 83 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specs. The picture below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-100 and WB35F.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-100 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB35F will show extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung WB35F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2014-02-06 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.10 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 389g (0.86 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $572 | $130 |