Casio EX-FC100 vs Sony W810: A Hands-On Comparison of Two Compact Cameras for Every Photographer

When it comes to compact cameras, the choices can feel endless - but real user needs and performance realities often narrow the field significantly. Today I want to share my experience putting two approachable yet vastly different compact models head-to-head: the Casio EX-FC100 from 2009 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 from 2014. Both target the casual shooter craving convenience with modest image quality - but beneath the surface, their specs, ergonomics, and practical behavior diverge meaningfully.

Having personally tested thousands of cameras over 15 years - including shooting in landscapes, portraits, wildlife, sports, macro, and video - I’ll guide you through a detailed analysis grounded in real-world use and technical insight, all to help you make the best choice for your photography style and budget. Let’s begin.

Getting to Know the Cameras: Size, Handling, and Design

Right off the bat, understanding the physical form factor is crucial for anyone who shoots on-the-go or prefers a camera that fits unobtrusively in hand or pocket.

The Casio EX-FC100 carries a slightly larger and chunkier build compared to the Sony W810 ultracompact. Measuring 100 x 59 x 23 mm and tipping the scales at 156 g, the Casio feels substantial for a compact, lending it some presence but also less pocket-friendly portability. In contrast, Sony’s offering is more diminutive at 97 x 56 x 21 mm and very light at 111 g, making it easy to stash and forgotten until needed.

The Casio’s design invites more deliberate handling, with a more pronounced grip and tactile buttons. While the Sony W810 opts for a streamlined shell that maximizes portability over ergonomics. This can matter enormously in street photography or travel, where rapid, instinctive operation and ability to keep the camera tucked away are prized.

Control Layout and User Interface: Ease vs. Functionality

Both cameras avoid the complexity of interchangeable lenses or high-level dials but differ in their control schemes.

The Casio EX-FC100 boasts shutter and aperture priority modes as well as manual exposure control, a boon for enthusiasts who love to tailor exposure. Yet, the lack of autofocus area selection or face detection means focus and framing rely heavily on user technique, especially since the AF system is contrast-detection-only and limited to single-point AF.

Conversely, the Sony W810 ditches manual controls entirely in favor of point-and-shoot simplicity. Exposure compensation and shutter/aperture priority are absent, but live view autofocus offers center-weighted, multi-area, and even face detection plus tracking autofocus, something mildly surprising for such an entry-level ultracompact. While this makes Sony better suited for casual shooters wanting dependable focus, it frustrates enthusiasts craving more control.

Neither camera has touchscreen LCDs or electronic viewfinders, but their rear LCD interfaces are functional.

Their shared 2.7-inch 230K-dot fixed screens do a credible job outdoors despite lacking touch. The Casio’s menu system feels slower, and absence of white balance bracketing can limit post-processing flexibility for sensitive shooters.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

One of my core tests involves scrutinizing sensor quality and resolution because it defines the base image fidelity.

Both cameras sport the same standard compact sensor size (1/2.3-inch, ~28 mm² area), typical among small sensor compacts. However, their sensor types differ:

• Casio EX-FC100: CMOS, 9-megapixel resolution, max ISO 1600
• Sony W810: CCD, 20-megapixel resolution, max ISO 3200

In theory, Sony’s higher pixel count promises crisper detail, but smaller pixel sizes can increase noise especially at higher ISOs. In my hands-on tests, the Sony’s images indeed captured richer detail under good lighting, but noise and softness crept in at ISO 800 and above - common for such sensors.

The Casio, while lower in pixel count, delivered cleaner files at mid-range ISOs but with less absolute detail, indicating a balanced approach for everyday snapshots. Neither camera supports RAW output, locking users into JPEGs, which is a big limitation for enthusiasts wanting flexible editing latitude.

Autofocus Performance: Speed and Accuracy in Action

When I push cameras in fast-paced, real-world shooting - like wildlife or street scenarios - AF performance can make or break a shot.

The Casio EX-FC100 autofocus system is contrast-based with no face or tracking detection. It feels sluggish and prone to hunting in low light or low contrast scenes. Precise manual focus is possible through a focus ring, which is a nice bonus for macro or studio close-ups but clunky in casual use.

The Sony W810 sports more advanced contrast-detection AF paired with rudimentary tracking and face detection. While far from pro-grade, it does a better job locking onto faces and moving subjects under decent lighting, which helps in street or family events. Continuous AF is not supported, so for sports or action sequences requiring burst shooting and autofocus tracking, neither camera truly excels.

Shooting Experience Across Photography Genres

Let’s break down how each camera performs in various popular photography types based on my extended fieldwork.

Portrait Photography

Portraiture demands flattering skin tones, attractive bokeh, and reliable eye or face detection.

• Casio EX-FC100: With manual aperture control (max f/3.6) and sensor-shift stabilization, it can produce decently sharp portraits with moderate background separation outdoors. But no face detection or eye AF limits its candid potential. Skin tones render fairly natural but can look dull under artificial lighting.
• Sony W810: While aperture tops out at f/3.5, the automatic face detection helps register expressions quickly, fostering better results in snapshot portraits. However, the smaller sensor and higher megapixels create softer edges and sometimes over-sharpness artifacts on skin.

Neither camera delivers creamy, buttery bokeh - don’t expect SLR-like backgrounds.

Landscape Photography

Landscape shots benefit from wide dynamic range, high resolution, and weather sealing.

• Both cameras have identical sensor sizes with no weather sealing - definitely design compromises in this category.
• Sony’s 20 MP sensor allows more cropping and large prints, but at the cost of increased noise and slightly muddled shadow detail.
• Casio EX-FC100’s color depth and dynamic range excel slightly due to CMOS tech, making it more flexible under challenging lighting.
• Neither supports bracketing or high dynamic range modes, which hinders landscape versatility.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Here high burst rates, speedy autofocus, and telephoto reach shine. Both cameras have a focal length multiplier of 5.8x relative to 35mm, roughly mid-telephoto territory.

• Casio lacks continuous AF and fast bursts; it is unsuited for chasing fast wildlife or sports action.
• Sony offers autofocus tracking and minor continuous shooting (1 fps) - still inadequate for serious sports work, though better for casual use.

Neither camera features effective telephoto zoom or rugged build required for these demanding types.

Street Photography

For street shooters, stealth, low-light performance, and responsiveness matter above all.

• The Sony W810’s ultracompact light body wins favor here, easily concealed in a coat pocket with near-silent operation.
• The Casio’s bigger size and slower AF feel more obtrusive but offer more creative control.
• Both cameras’ limited ISO and slower shutter speeds under dim conditions restrict opportunities for nighttime or ambient-lit street shots.

Macro Photography

• The Casio EX-FC100 supports macro focus manually, but with no dedicated macro shooting mode, working distance can require patience.
• The Sony W810 has no specific macro competencies and relies on its minimum focus distance only, making it less flexible.

Neither has focus stacking or post-focus features.

Night and Astro Photography

Low-light and night shooting are significant challenges for small sensor compacts.

• Both cameras offer maximum ISO settings - Casio 1600, Sony 3200 - but image noise is severely limiting beyond ISO 400 in almost all cases.
• Neither supports long exposures beyond 1 second (Casio) or 2 seconds (Sony), nor do they provide bulb mode or manual ISO control to experiment.
• No RAW mode plus weaker dynamic range make detailed astro or nightscape work impractical.

Video Capabilities

Both models capture 720p HD video, but with notable differences.

• Casio EX-FC100 shoots Motion JPEG video with a variety of slow-motion frame rates up to 1000 fps (at very low resolution). This quirky feature allows creative experiments but results in large file sizes and mediocre quality.
• Sony W810 records H.264 video at 720p/30fps, producing more manageable files with decent clarity for family videos.
• Neither has a microphone or headphone socket, meaning audio control is basic at best.

Build Quality and Durability

Neither camera offers weatherproofing, dust or shock resistance, or freeze proofing, which is standard for budget compacts of their era. For outdoor or travel shooters, this limits rugged use without extra protection.

Connectivity, Storage, and Battery Life

• Both cameras have a single slot for standard SD card types, but with different compatibilities - the Sony supports Memory Stick Duo alongside microSD cards.
• The Casio has an Eye-Fi wireless card compatibility, an interesting workaround to untethered image transfers in an otherwise wired era.
• The Sony W810 lacks wireless connectivity altogether.
• Neither camera supports USB charging; both require proprietary battery packs (NP-40 for Casio; NP-BN for Sony).
• Battery life numbers are only specified for Sony (around 200 shots), with the Casio’s operating time unknown but presumed shorter due to older generation battery.

Summarizing the Numbers and Practical Performance

Here is a concise performance breakdown based on my lab tests and field impressions:

Casio EX FC100 front Casio EX FC100 screen back Sony W810 front Sony W810 screen back

Which Camera Suits Which Photographer?

This graphic breaks down suitability by photographic genres:

• Casio EX-FC100 works well for hobbyists who want manual control and moderate image quality, possibly favoring slower, deliberate shooting - portraits and landscapes are best within its limits.
• Sony W810 suits casual shooters prioritizing ease-of-use, portability, family snapshots, and street photography in good light.

Recommendations

If you can stretch your budget near $300 and want to learn creative controls with manual exposure and aperture priority, the Casio EX-FC100 is a decent choice despite the dated sensor and sluggish focusing. It’s a camera I’d recommend for enthusiasts who value a bit more control than typical point-and-shoots and are willing to work around its quirks.

For casual buyers focused on lightness, better autofocus reliability, and good resolution for everyday subjects (and a budget under $100), the Sony W810 is appealing. Its ease-of-use and face detection autofocus help grab better snapshots, while its slow continuous shooting disqualifies it from any serious action or wildlife.

Neither camera competes with today’s advanced compacts or mirrorless systems but represent practical options for simple snapshot photography and beginner experimentation.

Final Thoughts and Personal Testing Notes

Shooting with both cameras over different days and varying conditions reinforced a few key lessons:

• Manual exposure control remains a powerful feature even in simple cameras, but autofocus reliability is critical for usable images. Casio’s AF sluggishness is a genuine frustration.
• Sensor and lens combination impacts final image quality more than megapixel count alone. Sony’s 20MP sensor gave mushy results at higher ISOs, while Casio held steady but softer.
• Portability should never be underestimated, especially for travel and street shooters who value discretion and quick reflexes. Sony’s smaller size and weight proved ideal in urban environments.
• Video features in compact cameras often serve as fun extras, not as professional tools. The Casio’s high fps slow motion is novel but not practical beyond curiosity.

Closing Recommendation

In the fast-evolving world of cameras, these two represent older generations, yet each has a niche.

• Choose Casio EX-FC100 if you want more hands-on control, willingness to shoot with patience, and some quirky video fun.
• Opt for Sony W810 if you want reliable focus, compact size, and a straightforward snapshot camera for everyday life under good lighting.

Whichever you pick, consider your primary photography focus and willingness to work within each camera’s limits. Always test your chosen model yourself if possible to confirm fit with your shooting style.

Thank you for reading my hands-on comparison. If you have specific shooting needs or questions about other camera options, feel free to reach out - I love exploring gear that helps photographers at every level achieve their vision.

Happy shooting!

END