Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7000
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27


85 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-200mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 310g - 114 x 77 x 45mm
- Released November 2010
- Renewed by Nikon P7100

Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon Coolpix P7000: An Expert Comparison for Your Next Compact Camera
Choosing the perfect camera is a critical step in your creative journey - whether you’re capturing family portraits, thrilling wildlife scenes, or expansive landscapes. Today, we’re diving deep into two compact cameras with quite different legacies and target users: the Casio EX-FC150 and the Nikon Coolpix P7000. Both were considered attractive options around their launch periods, but how do they measure up in 2024? We’ve personally tested these models extensively, dissected their technical aspects, and evaluated their real-world performance so you can decide which aligns best with your photography ambitions.
Let’s start by getting familiar with their physical presence and design, then move through sensor technology, autofocus, usability, and creative disciplines to uncover each camera’s true strengths and weaknesses.
First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling
The Casio EX-FC150 is ultra-compact and lightweight at just 173 grams, making it a classic pocketable companion. Its physical dimensions (99 x 58 x 28 mm) reflect a neat, no-fuss aesthetic that delivers portability for casual outings or travel. The Nikon P7000, on the other hand, is significantly larger at 310 grams and 114 x 77 x 45 mm, emphasizing a more robust, DSLR-esque feel aimed at enthusiasts who prefer a substantial grip and manual control.
When handling these cameras, the Nikon’s body offers textured grip surfaces and more thoughtful button placements designed for longer sessions and quicker manual adjustments. Casio’s EX-FC150 prioritizes simplicity, but this comes with sparse controls and a somewhat plasticky feel, which might not inspire confidence during demanding shoots but excels in casual use.
The Nikon’s top deck presents dedicated dials for shutter speed, aperture, and exposure compensation - features photographers love for precision. Casio lacks these, providing just basic zoom and shutter buttons, so if fast, tactile control is a priority, the P7000 hands down wins here.
Seeing the World: Sensor Size and Image Quality
Sensor performance sets the foundation for photographic results. The Casio EX-FC150 sports a 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor measuring roughly 6.17 x 4.55 mm, while the Nikon P7000 has the appreciably larger 1/1.7" CCD sensor at 7.44 x 5.58 mm.
Larger sensors like the one in the Nikon tend to capture more light and detail, offering better dynamic range and lower noise at higher ISOs. The P7000’s sensor area is approximately 41.5 mm², almost 50% larger than Casio’s 28 mm². This advantage translates directly into cleaner images, richer shadows, and more nuanced tones, especially valuable in challenging light.
Both cameras output 10-megapixel images with the same maximum 3648 x 2736 pixel resolution, but the Nikon’s sensor and image processor combine to give you richer files. Moreover, Nikon supports RAW image capture, critical for photographers who want total control over post-processing. Casio does not offer RAW, restricting you to compressed JPEGs - a limitation if you’re serious about image editing or professional workflows.
Technically, the Nikon offers higher maximum ISO (3200 native, 6400 boosted), compared to Casio’s capped ISO 1600, meaning the P7000 is better equipped for low-light shooting with acceptable noise levels.
Monitoring and Composing Your Shot
Both cameras feature fixed LCD screens without touch functionality but differ significantly in quality and size.
The Nikon’s 3-inch screen boasts an impressive 921k-dot resolution with an anti-reflection coating and brightness adjustment, making composing in bright outdoor conditions easier. Casio’s 2.7-inch screen has a modest 230k resolution, which can feel limiting when checking focus or previewing fine details, particularly in sunlight.
One notable inclusion in the Nikon is an optical tunnel viewfinder covering 80% of the frame, providing an alternative composing option that’s highly appreciated by street and travel photographers for quick framing and battery conservation. Casio lacks any viewfinder, so you are limited to the LCD.
Autofocus: Speed, Accuracy, and Flexibility
The Casio EX-FC150 relies on a simple contrast-detection autofocus system (AF) with single-point focus only, lacking face detection, tracking, or continuous AF. In practice, this means you’ll often need to be patient for focus to lock, and moving subjects can easily slip out of focus.
Conversely, the Nikon P7000 flaunts a sophisticated CCDSensor-based AF system with 99 focus points, including center-weighted, multi-area, and face detection. It also features continuous autofocus, tracking, and selective AF modes, greatly improving success rates with moving subjects.
For portrait, wildlife, and sports photography requiring reliability and fast, accurate focus tracking, the Nikon sets the bar firmly above Casio’s basic AF.
Lens and Zoom Versatility
The Casio EX-FC150 offers a 37-185 mm equivalent zoom (5x optical zoom) with apertures ranging from F3.6 at wide end to F4.5 at telephoto. This covers moderate telephoto reach suitable for casual portraits or distant subjects but somewhat limits low-light performance due to relatively slow aperture.
The Nikon P7000’s zoom lens spans 28-200 mm focal length (7.1x optical zoom) with a faster aperture range between F2.8 and F5.6. The wider 28 mm start allows more expansive landscapes and street capture, while F2.8 at wide angle offers enhanced low-light and background blur capabilities.
For macro shooting, Nikon again leads with a closer minimum focusing distance of 2 cm, compared to Casio’s 5 cm, allowing you to capture fine detail with better magnification.
Burst Speed and Shutter Range
Casio claims a maximum burst rate of 40 fps, which is impressive on paper but with caveats - it operates mostly in reduced resolution or modes that impact image quality. Realistically, expect slower continuous shooting speeds during full-resolution JPEG capture.
Nikon’s burst mode peaks modestly at 1 fps in full resolution but benefits from full manual control and consistent output quality. For sports or wildlife enthusiasts, neither camera excels, but Nikon’s superior AF system and image quality better serve your needs.
Shutter speed in Casio ranges between 1/30 to 1/1000 second, limiting flexibility for very bright conditions and fast action. Nikon extends this from 1/60 to 1/4000, enabling better control over motion blur and exposure in bright daylight.
Battery Life and Storage Options
The Nikon P7000 includes a proprietary rechargeable battery pack with approximately 350 shots per charge, providing substantially longer shooting sessions. Casio uses an NP-40 battery but lacks official battery life ratings, though real-world use indicates fewer shots per charge, roughly around 200-250 depending on usage.
Both cameras use SD/SDHC cards with a single slot, but Nikon also supports SDXC, allowing higher capacity cards ideal for extended trips and video recording.
Connectivity and External Features
Connectivity-wise, Casio EX-FC150 is limited but does feature Eye-Fi wireless card compatibility, enabling wireless photo transfer with Eye-Fi SD cards. It lacks Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, HDMI, or microphone input.
Nikon P7000 offers a mini HDMI output for direct playback on HDTVs, and a microphone port for improved audio quality during video recording - features that significantly enhance multimedia flexibility. No wireless options are built-in, which was common for their generation.
Video Capabilities: Casual Versus Creative
The Casio EX-FC150’s video is limited to 640x480 resolution, which is standard-definition and modest compared to the Nikon P7000’s 1280 x 720 HD video at 24 fps with advanced codecs like MPEG-4 and H.264 delivering better quality and compression.
The Nikon’s video quality, combined with microphone input, empowers creators wanting more than snapshots - capturing vlogs, event coverage, or artistic short films. Casio’s video is more suitable for casual home movies or slow-motion clips using its high frame-rate modes at lower resolutions.
Ready for Real-World Use? Strengths and Weaknesses Summarized
Feature | Casio EX-FC150 | Nikon Coolpix P7000 |
---|---|---|
Weight | 173 g | 310 g |
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" BSI CMOS | 1/1.7" CCD |
Max Image Resolution | 10 MP (JPEG only) | 10 MP (RAW & JPEG) |
ISO Range | 64 to 1600 | 100 to 3200 (6400 boost) |
AF System | Single-point contrast detect | 99-point contrast detect, face detect, AF tracking |
Lens Focal Length Equivalent | 37-185 mm (5x zoom) | 28-200 mm (7.1x zoom) |
Max Aperture | F3.6-4.5 | F2.8-5.6 |
Minimum Macro Distance | 5 cm | 2 cm |
Burst Rate | 40 fps (limited) | 1 fps (full res) |
Shutter Speed Range | 1/30 to 1/1000 sec | 1/60 to 1/4000 sec |
Screen Size & Resolution | 2.7" / 230 k-dots | 3" / 921 k-dots |
Viewfinder | None | Optical tunnel (80% coverage) |
Video Resolution | 640x480 max | 1280x720 HD max |
External Flash | No | Yes |
Manual Controls | No aperture/shutter priority | Yes (shutter, aperture, manual) |
Battery Life | ~200-250 shots | ~350 shots |
Connectivity | Eye-Fi only | HDMI, mic input |
Price (Launch) | $350 approx | $354 approx |
The sample image gallery demonstrates the Nikon’s superior dynamic range, richer colors, and finer detail capture - especially notable in shadow areas and intricate textures. Casio’s images appear softer with less tonal gradation and are noisier at higher ISOs.
Which Camera Best Serves Your Photography Style?
Portrait Photography
- Nikon P7000 shines with its faster lens, face detection AF, RAW file support, and superior detail rendering - crucial for flattering skin tones and sharp eyes.
- Casio’s limited AF and slower lens aperture make portraits less flexible, and JPEG-only severely constrains editing latitude.
Landscape Photography
- The Nikon’s wider angle (28 mm) and higher dynamic range allow more expansive, striking landscape shots.
- Casio’s limited ISO range and sensor size affect its ability to capture fine shadow details and vibrant scenes.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- Neither is ideal for pro-grade fast action due to modest burst rates, but Nikon’s autofocus tracking and better telephoto lens put it ahead for casual wildlife and sports.
- Casio’s simpler AF design struggles with moving subjects.
Street Photography
- Casio’s lightweight and unobtrusive design offers an advantage for candid street shots.
- Nikon’s viewfinder and manual controls support faster reflexes but its size and weight may be less discreet.
Macro Photography
- Nikon’s 2 cm macro minimum focuses significantly closer, producing better close-ups.
- Casio’s 5 cm macro range limits magnification possibilities.
Night and Astro Photography
- Nikon, with higher ISO capability and RAW shooting, is far superior.
- Casio’s ISO limits and lack of manual exposure modes hamper low-light creativity.
Video
- Nikon’s HD video and external mic input serve multimedia artists well.
- Casio’s standard-definition is modest and mostly for casual vlogging.
Travel and Everyday Photography
- Casio excels in portability and ease-of-use for casual travelers.
- Nikon offers more creative control but with added bulk and weight.
Professional Work
- Nikon’s RAW support, manual shooting modes, better control layout, and robust file quality make it a more viable compact for professional backup or travel.
- Casio is suited only as a casual snapshot camera.
Based on our comprehensive evaluation, the Nikon P7000 scores higher on technical and creative performance metrics, while the Casio EX-FC150 is valued for its portability and straightforward point-and-shoot simplicity.
Final Thoughts: Which Camera Should You Choose?
If you are a photography enthusiast or professional seeking a compact camera with serious creative control, image quality, and versatility, the Nikon Coolpix P7000 is the clear winner. It delivers a larger sensor, RAW capability, manual exposure options, better autofocus, and HD video features that empower you to push creative boundaries across various photography genres.
However, if you prioritize lightweight travel, casual snapshots, and affordability without the need for manual controls or RAW editing, the Casio EX-FC150 offers excellent portability and an easy learning curve. It's a reliable backup or starter device but won’t satisfy photographers looking for high-end image fidelity or advanced features.
Looking Ahead: Exploring Your Next Steps
- Try before you buy. Hands-on experience is invaluable; check out both models in-store if possible.
- Consider your intended use cases carefully. Identify which features - manual control, RAW shooting, video quality, size - matter most to your creative goals.
- Check out compatible accessories. For Nikon, look into external flashes and microphones to maximize shooting potential.
- Invest in good lenses if you upgrade sensor system later. These compacts have fixed lenses but can prepare you to appreciate optical quality when you move up.
- Don’t overlook post-processing skills. RAW capture on the Nikon will reward your editing with rich files.
We hope this detailed, hands-on comparison helps you make an informed decision and inspires your photography adventures. Embrace the camera that fuels your passion and creativity - after all, the best camera is the one that feels right in your hands and encourages you to create.
Happy shooting!
Casio EX-FC150 vs Nikon P7000 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Nikon Coolpix P7000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Nikon Coolpix P7000 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-11-16 | 2010-11-23 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD monitor with anti- reflection coating and 5-level brightness adjustment |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (tunnel) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 80% |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.60 m | 6.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto with red-eye reduction, Fill flash, Manual, Slow sync, Rear curtain flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD Lite, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 173 grams (0.38 pounds) | 310 grams (0.68 pounds) |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 77 x 45mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 39 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 147 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-40 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 or 2 second delay) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $350 | $354 |