Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VR-330
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus VR-320
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Below is a complete overview of the Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VR-330, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and VR-330 (14MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FC150 was launched 14 months before the VR-330 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-FC150 scores vs the VR-330 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Olympus VR-330. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Olympus VR-330
| EX-FC150 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Casio EX-FC150
| VR-330 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2011 |  | November 2009 | More recent by 14 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Olympus VR-330
| EX-FC150 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you should think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-FC150 offers physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VR-330 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-FC150 and the VR-330.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC150 and VR-330 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by going over technical specs. The graphic below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC150 and VR-330.
As you can tell, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus VR-330 to offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The older EX-FC150 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-FC150 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-11-16 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $350 | $220 |