Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST93
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
97 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released April 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST93 Overview
Below is a complete assessment of the Casio EX-FC150 and Samsung ST93, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FC150 (10MP) and ST93 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-FC150 was revealed 17 months before the ST93 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FC150 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-FC150 matches up against the ST93 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FC150 and Samsung ST93. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FC150 Gallery and Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Samsung ST93
| EX-FC150 | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Casio EX-FC150
| ST93 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2011 |  | November 2009 | More recent by 17 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FC150 and Samsung ST93
| EX-FC150 | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-FC150 features outer measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Samsung ST93 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FC150 and Samsung ST93 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-FC150 against the ST93.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FC150 and ST93 is 93 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through technical specs. The photograph here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FC150 and ST93.
As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Samsung ST93 to provide more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older EX-FC150 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-FC150 vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung ST93 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | Samsung ST93 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-11-16 | 2011-04-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-185mm (5.0x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.6-4.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 173 grams (0.38 lb) | 110 grams (0.24 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $350 | - |
