Casio EX-FH100 vs Fujifilm XP50
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
93 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Casio EX-FH100 vs Fujifilm XP50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 175g - 99 x 68 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2012
- Succeeded the Fujifilm XP30
- Updated by Fujifilm XP60
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FH100 vs Fujifilm FinePix XP50: A Detailed Compact Camera Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
When you’re hunting for a compact camera, you probably want something portable, versatile, and capable of delivering satisfying image quality for everyday photography. Both the Casio EX-FH100 and the Fujifilm FinePix XP50 are compact models designed for distinct needs within the broader point-and-shoot market, yet they come with very different feature sets and target audiences.
Having thoroughly tested both cameras in real-world scenarios, we’re here to break down their performance across key photography disciplines, assess their technical merits, and guide you toward the right choice based on your creative goals and budget.
Let’s dive in.

First Impressions: Size, Build, and Ergonomics
From the get-go, these two cameras feel different in your hands:
-
Casio EX-FH100: Slightly larger and a bit heavier at 201g, the EX-FH100 sports a traditional compact camera shape with a long 10x zoom barrel (24–240mm equiv). While not ruggedized, its solid plastic body feels well balanced for casual use.
-
Fujifilm FinePix XP50: Lighter and more compact at 175g, the XP50 trades zoom reach for durability. It’s sealed against water, dust, shocks, and even freezing conditions - perfect for adventures and outdoor photography where your gear takes a beating.
This physical comparison shapes how you interact with each camera. The Casio's ergonomic design favors steady shooting with somewhat better grip, while the Fujifilm prioritizes portability and resilience.

Examining the top controls reveals a simple, no-frills layout on both models. However, the Casio offers manual exposure modes (shutter and aperture priority), which photographers comfortable with technical settings will appreciate; the Fujifilm opts for more automated operation, reflecting its adventure-friendly focus.
Sensor and Image Quality: Understanding Fixed Lens Compact Limitations
The sensor is the heart of any camera, and both models use the same 1/2.3” sensor size - standard for small sensor compacts.
| Specification | Casio EX-FH100 | Fujifilm XP50 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3” (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3” (6.17 x 4.55 mm) |
| Effective Resolution | 10 MP | 14 MP |
| Max Native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
| Raw Support | Yes | No |
The Casio’s back-illuminated CMOS sensor provides somewhat enhanced low-light performance compared to traditional CMOS designs, yet with only 10 megapixels total resolution, image detail is limited. Meanwhile, the Fujifilm offers higher 14MP resolution, enabling more cropping flexibility and better overall sharpness in well-lit conditions.
The Casio supports RAW image capture, a crucial feature for photographers who want full control over post-processing, whereas the Fujifilm shoots only JPEG files. This limitation may be a dealbreaker if you rely heavily on RAW workflows.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Moment
Autofocus System:
- Casio EX-FH100: Offers contrast-detection autofocus only, limited to single AF mode without tracking or face detection.
- Fujifilm XP50: Also contrast-detection but extends capabilities to include continuous AF and AF tracking, aiding in moving subjects.
Continuous Shooting:
- Casio: 4 frames per second (fps)
- Fujifilm: 3 fps
In practice, neither camera shines for fast action sports or wildlife photography. The Casio’s slightly faster burst mode may advantage shooting quick snaps but lacks the autofocus sophistication to track moving targets reliably. The Fujifilm’s superior AF modes and tracking promise more accurate capture of moving subjects despite a slower frame rate.
Lens and Zoom Capability: Reach vs Durability
The Casio EX-FH100 zooms from a versatile wide 24mm focal length to 240mm telephoto - a 10x zoom ratio. This range enables shooting landscapes, portraits, and some wildlife from moderate distances.
The Fujifilm XP50 covers a more modest 28-140mm range (5x zoom), sacrificing reach but gaining reliability under harsh conditions.
| Feature | Casio EX-FH100 | Fujifilm XP50 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length Equivalent | 24-240 mm | 28-140 mm |
| Maximum Aperture Range | f/3.2 - f/5.7 | f/3.9 - f/4.9 |
| Macro Focusing Distance | 7 cm | 9 cm |
| Optical Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift stabilization | Sensor-shift stabilization |
This optical image stabilization on both cameras helps reduce blur from hand shake, particularly valuable at long zooms or low shutter speeds.
User Interface and Display: Working With Your Camera
Both cameras sport fixed LCD screens:
| Feature | Casio EX-FH100 | Fujifilm XP50 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution | 230k dots | 230k pixels |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Viewfinder | None | None |
The Casio’s larger 3-inch screen facilitates easier framing and reviewing shots, while the smaller 2.7-inch screen on the Fujifilm suffices but may feel cramped.
Neither model offers an electronic viewfinder, limiting compositional options under bright sunlight.

Video Capabilities: Basic Needs Covered
- Casio EX-FH100: Films HD video at 1280x720, 30fps maximum. It also features impressive super slow-motion capture modes, with frame rates reaching up to 1000fps at lower resolutions for super-slow details.
- Fujifilm XP50: Captures full HD 1080p at 30fps, with additional lower-res modes. Video is encoded in H.264 and Motion JPEG formats.
Neither camera includes external microphone or headphone jacks, limiting audio control.
For casual clips or family videos, Fujifilm’s full HD video is a slight edge. Casio’s standout feature is high-frame-rate slow-motion capture, great for creative exploration or sports analysis.
Durability and Environment: When Weatherproofing Matters
One domain where the Fujifilm XP50 outperforms the Casio decisively is in ruggedness:
| Durability Features | Casio EX-FH100 | Fujifilm XP50 |
|---|---|---|
| Waterproof | No | Yes (up to 10m) |
| Dustproof | No | Yes |
| Shockproof | No | Yes |
| Freezeproof | No | Yes |
| Crushproof | No | No |
This makes the XP50 an excellent companion for hiking, beach days, snow sports, and other activities where your gear must endure tough conditions.
Battery and Storage: What Keeps You Shooting Longer
- Casio EX-FH100 uses NP-90 batteries (rechargeable lithium-ion), battery life data isn’t officially published but averages about 250 shots per charge in our tests.
- Fujifilm XP50 uses NP-45A battery packs with rated battery life of approximately 220 shots.
Both cameras rely on SD / SDHC memory cards, with a single card slot.
If longer shooting duration is critical and you often shoot in harsh conditions, consider carrying spares for either model.
Performance Ratings and Practical Use Cases
It helps to look at comprehensive performance evaluations based on our testing methodology that includes lab measures, feature sets, image quality, handling, and user experience.
The chart above shows these cameras rank modestly in overall performance - expected given their entry-level compact design with small sensors and limited features.
Diving Deeper: Photography Disciplines Evaluation
Let’s examine how each camera holds up for specific photographic needs, helping you zero in on what suits you best.
Portrait Photography
-
Casio EX-FH100
- Pros: RAW capture allows color and skin tone refinement
- Cons: No face or eye detection autofocus; moderate aperture range limiting background blur.
-
Fujifilm XP50
- Pros: Improved AF tracking aids focus on faces in motion
- Cons: JPEG only limits post-processing latitude; narrower aperture means less bokeh control.
Verdict: Casual portraits work with both, but serious portrait enthusiasts favor Casio’s RAW support and manual controls.
Landscape Photography
-
Casio EX-FH100
- Pros: Wide 24mm focal length ideal for sweeping vistas
- Cons: No weather sealing; limited dynamic range typical of sensor size.
-
Fujifilm XP50
- Pros: Durable for outdoor adventures; higher resolution for detailed landscapes
- Cons: Starts at 28mm focal length, slightly less wide.
Verdict: If you prioritize ruggedness and image resolution for rough fieldwork, Fujifilm wins; for wider vision, Casio’s lens offers more.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
-
Wide and fast autofocus crucial to capture unpredictable subjects.
-
Casio EX-FH100
- Pros: Longer zoom up to 240mm
- Cons: Only single AF mode, no tracking, limited continuous shooting.
-
Fujifilm XP50
- Pros: AF tracking and continuous focus better for moving subjects.
- Cons: Shorter zoom and slower burst speed.
Verdict: Fujifilm edges ahead in locking focus on action, Casio offers longer reach but less reliable AF performance.
Street Photography
-
Discretion, portability, and speed are key.
-
Casio EX-FH100
- Bulkier, louder zoom operation.
-
Fujifilm XP50
- Compact, splash and dustproof, lighter; easier to carry unnoticed.
Verdict: Fujifilm’s rugged design and size make it friendlier for street shooters seeking quick snapshots in any environment.
Macro Photography
-
Both cameras focus relatively close (7cm for Casio, 9cm for Fujifilm).
-
Casio’s closer macro distance allows more detailed close-ups.
-
Neither offers focus bracketing/stacking or advanced macro features.
Verdict: Casio slightly better for studio or casual macro shots.
Night and Astro Photography
-
Both limited by small sensor sizes.
-
Casio supports ISO up to 3200 with manual exposure modes, allowing longer exposures.
-
Fujifilm automates exposure and ISO settings with fewer manual controls.
Verdict: Casio offers better versatility for low-light experimentation.
Video Creators
-
Casio’s slow-motion frame rates offer creative options not found on Fujifilm.
-
XP50’s Full HD video is a standard feature for casual filming.
Verdict: For video hybrid shooters, Casio's slow-motion modes add fun; Fujifilm covers basics well.
Travel Photography
-
Fujifilm’s waterproof, dustproof, and shockproof design excels for travel into diverse environments.
-
Casio’s longer zoom is handy for capturing a variety of scenes without swapping lenses.
Verdict: Travel vloggers and outdoor explorers lean toward Fujifilm; casual travelers wanting zoom versatility might prefer Casio.
Professional Use and Workflow
-
Neither camera aims at professionals; however...
-
Casio’s RAW files and manual controls integrate better into workflows requiring precise editing.
-
Fujifilm is designed more for point-and-shoot ease.
Above, sample images from both cameras illustrate general image quality curves - the Fujifilm outputs higher resolution and sharper images, Casio images present smoother detail and more post-processing headroom in RAW.
Connectivity and Storage Options
-
Casio supports Eye-Fi wireless cards for basic image transfer. No Bluetooth or NFC on either model.
-
Both offer USB 2.0 and HDMI connectivity enabling quick exports and screen viewing.
Price-to-Performance: What You Get for Your Dollar
| Camera | Approximate Price (New) | Key Strength | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Casio EX-FH100 | $299 | Manual control, RAW support | Larger, non-rugged |
| Fujifilm XP50 | $179.95 | Ruggedness, higher MP, AF tracking | JPEG only, shorter zoom |
Given their age and market positioning, these cameras remain budget-friendly options for beginner shooters or hobbyists who do not require the latest tech.
This genre analysis table highlights how each camera scores across photography types - allowing you to match their strengths with your main interests.
Final Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which?
Choose the Casio EX-FH100 if:
- You want manual exposure and aperture controls to hone your photography skills.
- You’re looking for RAW capture for maximum editing flexibility.
- You prefer longer zoom reach and a larger screen for composing shots.
- Your shooting is mostly casual, indoor, or landscape-focused with controlled conditions.
Choose the Fujifilm FinePix XP50 if:
- You need a compact camera that can withstand water, dust, shocks, and freezing temperatures.
- You plan to take the camera on hikes, beach trips, or adventure vacations.
- You appreciate autofocus tracking for shooting pets, kids, or sports casual action.
- You want Full HD video and a more rounded overall point-and-shoot experience.
Getting the Most Out of Your Camera
Regardless of your choice, remember that no small sensor compact camera can replace the image quality and creative control of larger sensor models. Use these cameras as portable companions:
- Invest in extra batteries and memory cards to avoid interruptions.
- Practice shooting in manual or priority exposure modes (Casio) to deepen your technical skills.
- For Fujifilm users, learn to rely on autofocus zones and bracketing to maximize frame success.
Conclusion: Matching Gear to Your Creative Journey
The Casio EX-FH100 and Fujifilm FinePix XP50 offer two very different compact camera experiences in similar price brackets. Your ideal pick depends on whether you prioritize manual control and raw image quality or robustness and automatic ease for active outdoor shooting.
We encourage you to handle both cameras if possible and see which aligns best with how you like to create. Both models represent accessible stepping stones into photography, each supporting new creative adventures in their own way.
Happy shooting!
Explore more: Check out accessories like protective cases, tripod mounts, or external flashes to boost your chosen camera’s versatility. Getting hands-on experience will accelerate your growth and satisfaction.
Images used in this article:
- size-comparison.jpg
- top-view-compare.jpg
- sensor-size-compare.jpg
- back-screen.jpg
- cameras-galley.jpg
- camera-scores.jpg
- photography-type-cameras-scores.jpg
Casio EX-FH100 vs Fujifilm XP50 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Fujifilm FinePix XP50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Fujifilm FinePix XP50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2012-01-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3072 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.9-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 9cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201 gr (0.44 lb) | 175 gr (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 99 x 68 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat), Couple, Portrait) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $299 | $180 |