Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5010

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus FE-5010 front
Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-330
Olympus FE-5010
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-300 and Olympus FE-5010, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both offered by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FE-5010 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FE-5010 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-300 was launched 5 years prior to the FE-5010 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus FE-5010 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-300 scores against the FE-5010 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus FE-5010

 E-300 FE-5010 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Olympus E-300

 FE-5010 E-300 
IntroducedJanuary 2009January 2005Newer by 48 months
Display size2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kClearer display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus FE-5010

 E-300 FE-5010 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 comes with outside dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-5010 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-300 and Olympus FE-5010 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-300 vs the FE-5010.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5010 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and FE-5010 is 67 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5010 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The image below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and FE-5010.

As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus FE-5010 will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5010 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography details
Olympus FE-5010 Portrait photography details
48
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
does not have liveview
low MP (8 megapixels)
21
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography factors
Olympus FE-5010 Street photography factors
51
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lighter than average (130 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography details
Olympus FE-5010 Sports photography details
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography details
Olympus FE-5010 Travel photography details
45
flash built-in
missing Timelapse mode
low MP (8 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
60
lighter than average (130g)
weather proofing
flash built-in
no Timelapse recording
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus FE-5010 as a Landscape photography camera
43
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
small screen (1.8 inches)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
missing Timelapse mode
31
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7")
no manual mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus FE-5010 as a Vlogging camera
9
can't shoot video
28
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (130 grams)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
no external microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus FE-5010
 Olympus E-300Olympus FE-5010
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-300 Olympus FE-5010
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 -
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2005-01-10 2009-01-07
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 400 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 36-180mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.5-5.6
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 1.8 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 134k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 4.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 grams (1.38 lb) 130 grams (0.29 lb)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required)
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $800 $130