Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak Z915
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Released January 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak Z915 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Casio EX-FH100 and Kodak Z915, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and the Z915 (10MP) is very similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-FH100 was launched 18 months later than the Z915 making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-FH100 matches up vs the Z915 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Kodak EasyShare Z915. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Kodak Z915
| EX-FH100 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 18 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Casio EX-FH100
| Z915 | EX-FH100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Kodak Z915
| EX-FH100 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH100 comes with physical dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z915 has measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FH100 and Kodak Z915 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the EX-FH100 compared to the Z915.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and Z915 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements just by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH100 and Z915.
To sum up, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same MP so you can expect similar quality of photos though you would want to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The more modern EX-FH100 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-FH100 vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-06-16 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $299 | $200 |