Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-50

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Olympus SH-50 front
Portability
88
Imaging
40
Features
48
Overall
43

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Launched April 2010
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-P1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-P3
Olympus SH-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
  • Released January 2013
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-50 Overview

Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SH-50, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and SH-50 (16MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and SH-50 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-P2 was released 3 years before the SH-50 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera.

Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-P2 grades versus the SH-50 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus SH-50

 E-P2 SH-50 

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Olympus E-P2

 SH-50 E-P2 
ReleasedJanuary 2013April 2010Newer by 33 months
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SH-50

 E-P2 SH-50 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurements
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-P2 comes with external dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus SH-50 has specifications of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SH-50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-P2 versus the SH-50.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-50 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and SH-50 is 86 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-50 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The picture below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P2 and SH-50.

As you have seen, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-P2 because of its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus SH-50 will give greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-50 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography advice
Olympus SH-50 Portrait photography advice
60
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
sensor resolution low (12MP)
44
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-P2
Street photography with Olympus SH-50
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
64
image stabilization (Optical)
supports touch focus
lighter than competition (269g)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Sports photography details
Olympus SH-50 Sports photography details
40
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
terrible battery life (300 per charge)
has no phase detect AF
48
long zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-P2
Travel photography with Olympus SH-50
43
does not have Timelapse mode
terrible battery life (300 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
69
lighter than competition (269g)
supports touch focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
great reach (600mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Landscape photography features
Olympus SH-50 Landscape photography features
60
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
terrible battery life (300 shots)
does not have Timelapse mode
49
has manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Vlogging highlights
Olympus SH-50 Vlogging highlights
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detect focusing
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone port
34
reasonably wide (25mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (269g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of external mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Olympus SH-50
 Olympus PEN E-P2Olympus SH-50
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus PEN E-P2 Olympus SH-50
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-04-22 2013-01-08
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic V TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 15s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 12.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 355g (0.78 pounds) 269g (0.59 pounds)
Dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 505 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photos -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-1 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Launch cost $799 $300