Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus SH-3
92 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus SH-2
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-FH100 versus Olympus SH-3, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and SH-3 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-FH100 was unveiled 6 years before the SH-3 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-FH100 scores vs the SH-3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Olympus SH-3
| EX-FH100 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Casio EX-FH100
| SH-3 | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 68 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Olympus SH-3
| EX-FH100 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH100 has physical measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FH100 versus Olympus SH-3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-FH100 versus the SH-3.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH100 and SH-3 is 92 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions only by going through specifications. The image here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH100 and SH-3.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus SH-3 to provide more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH100 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FH100 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2016-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 11.5 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lbs) | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $299 | $579 |
