Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-S200
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-S200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Revealed July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-S200 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-S200, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are offered by Casio. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and EX-S200 (14MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FH25 was launched about the same time to the EX-S200 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-FH25 scores against the EX-S200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-S200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Casio Exilim EX-S200. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Casio EX-S200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Casio EX-S200
| EX-FH25 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Casio EX-FH25
| EX-S200 | EX-FH25 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Casio EX-S200
| EX-FH25 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2010 |  | August 2010 | Similar generation |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-S200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 provides physical dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Casio EX-S200 has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-S200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-FH25 versus the EX-S200.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and EX-S200 is 69 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-S200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by reviewing technical specs. The picture below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and EX-S200.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Casio EX-S200 to offer extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-S200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-S200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Casio |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Casio Exilim EX-S200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2010-08-03 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524 grams (1.16 pounds) | 132 grams (0.29 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | NP-120 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $450 | $0 |