Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4000
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b162/7b162df3ec790c8fdeb836e01efa7053559c47f1" alt="Olympus FE-4000 front Olympus FE-4000 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-925
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-300 and Olympus FE-4000, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are designed by Olympus. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FE-4000 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FE-4000 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-300 was released 5 years earlier than the FE-4000 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-300 matches up vs the FE-4000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Olympus FE-4000. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus FE-4000
E-300 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus E-300
FE-4000 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2009 | ![]() | January 2005 | More recent by 55 months |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus FE-4000
E-300 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 offers exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus FE-4000 has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-300 and Olympus FE-4000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-300 and the FE-4000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cc76/9cc76851446c8a6e66f54c3b5eaf10868a062977" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4000 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4000 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and FE-4000 is 67 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c179/8c1799dfdccf3eb2c26cdb7bb521a24257fcf00b" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and FE-4000.
As you can see, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-300 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus FE-4000 will show extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23e6a/23e6a0a5af0b67448fee9de9756b1edbc6a84bcc" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb9f3/bb9f36bb2eb5fd0c97b60243658dfe69f1dd6e30" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus FE-4000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus FE-4000 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | X-925 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2009-07-22 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.6-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.8" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 134 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lb) | 136g (0.30 lb) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $800 | $130 |