Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL620
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Announced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Also Known as PL65
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung SL620, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-FH25 was announced 17 months later than the SL620 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-FH25 grades against the SL620 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Samsung SL620. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung SL620
| EX-FH25 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2010 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 17 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Casio EX-FH25
| SL620 | EX-FH25 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung SL620
| EX-FH25 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH25 comes with external measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL620 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung SL620 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FH25 vs the SL620.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and SL620 is 69 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through specs. The photograph here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and SL620.
All in all, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Samsung SL620 to result in greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots more aggressively. The newer EX-FH25 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung SL620 |
| Also Known as | - | PL65 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 grams (1.16 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $450 | $200 |