Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB210
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Below is a extended review of the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and WB210 (14MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-FH25 was introduced 12 months prior to the WB210 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-FH25 scores vs the WB210 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Samsung WB210. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung WB210
| EX-FH25 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Sharper display (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-FH25
| WB210 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 12 months |
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung WB210
| EX-FH25 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH25 comes with physical measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung WB210 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-FH25 vs the WB210.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and WB210 is 69 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out technical specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and WB210.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB210 to produce extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB210 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-07-06 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524g (1.16 lb) | 174g (0.38 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $450 | $279 |