Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S6900
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
93 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S6900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 181g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2015
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S6900 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Casio EX-FS10 and Nikon S6900, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Nikon. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and S6900 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-FS10 was announced 7 years before the S6900 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-FS10 grades versus the S6900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S6900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Nikon Coolpix S6900. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Nikon S6900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Nikon S6900
| EX-FS10 | S6900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon S6900 over the Casio EX-FS10
| S6900 | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 74 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Nikon S6900
| EX-FS10 | S6900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S6900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 enjoys outer measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Nikon S6900 has dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FS10 and Nikon S6900 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-FS10 compared to the S6900.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and S6900 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S6900 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing purely by checking specs. The visual underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and S6900.
All in all, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Nikon S6900 to give more detail with its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S6900 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S6900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Nikon Coolpix S6900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Nikon Coolpix S6900 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.3-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 9.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 2.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121 gr (0.27 pounds) | 181 gr (0.40 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 180 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-80 | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $200 | $190 |