Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26


92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-FS10 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is very well matched but the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor dimensions.

The EX-FS10 was revealed 3 years before the GR Digital IV which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-FS10 matches up vs the GR Digital IV when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-FS10 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-FS10
GR Digital IV | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 32 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-FS10 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FS10 offers exterior measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FS10 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-FS10 and the GR Digital IV.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FS10 and GR Digital IV is 96 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions just by checking specs. The picture below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and GR Digital IV.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-FS10 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh GR Digital IV will resolve extra detail because of its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 1 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121 gr (0.27 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-80 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $200 | $599 |