Clicky

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
18
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Casio EX-FS10
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
  • 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Released February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Here is a in-depth comparison of the Casio EX-FS10 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) provide totally different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-FS10 was revealed 6 years before the DP2 Quattro and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-FS10 grades against the DP2 Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-FS10 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-FS10

 DP2 Quattro EX-FS10 
ReleasedFebruary 2014January 2009Fresher by 62 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-FS10 DP2 Quattro 
Manually focus More exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FS10 enjoys physical measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has sizing of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-FS10 and Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-FS10 vs the DP2 Quattro.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FS10 and DP2 Quattro is 96 and 70 respectively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing just by checking specifications. The photograph underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FS10 and DP2 Quattro.

To sum up, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-FS10 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will resolve extra detail because of its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-FS10
Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
25
manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
77
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detect focus
exports RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Street photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography factors
47
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
61
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Sports photography features
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography features
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,250 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
48
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Travel photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography advice
51
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
53
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
26
manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.5")
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
missing Time Lapse recording
59
you can focus manually
screen size is decent (3")
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not good (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic socket
9
no video recording
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FS10 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Casio Exilim EX-FS10Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Make Casio Sigma
Model Casio Exilim EX-FS10 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Class Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2009-01-08 2014-02-13
Body design Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3456 x 2592 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 38-114mm (3.0x) 45mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.9-7.1 f/2.8
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1250 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash modes - no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) -
Max video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 121 grams (0.27 pounds) 395 grams (0.87 pounds)
Physical dimensions 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-80 BP-51
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible -
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $200 $931