Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony A7S III
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26


61 Imaging
64 Features
92 Overall
75
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony A7S III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 102400 (Bump to 409600)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 699g - 129 x 97 x 81mm
- Launched July 2020
- Succeeded the Sony A7S II

From Pocketable Point-and-Shoot to Pro Mirrorless: Comparing the Casio EX-FS10 and Sony A7S III
In my fifteen years of evaluating cameras, I’ve encountered gear designed for wildly different purposes - some prioritize simplicity and portability, while others push the boundaries of image quality and versatility. Today, I’m comparing two cameras at two ends of that spectrum: the modest, ultracompact Casio EX-FS10, and the powerhouse professional mirrorless Sony Alpha A7S III.
Though these cameras are separated by over a decade of technological advances and vastly different design philosophies, examining them side-by-side reveals how far camera technology has evolved and clarifies what to expect depending on your photographic needs and budget.
In this deep dive, I’ll break down all the essential facets - from sensor technology and autofocus to handling, image quality, and usability - backing up insights with my hands-on experience and technical testing. Whether you are a beginner seeking effortless snapshots or a pro demanding exceptional video and stills, I’ll help you discern which camera fits your journey best.
A Tale of Two Builds: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics
The Casio EX-FS10 is tiny, lightweight, and designed to vanish into a pocket. Its ultracompact form factor (102x55x20mm, weighing just 121g) is ideal for casual outings where bulk is a dealbreaker. The fixed lens and minimal controls make it approachable for folks who want to point and shoot with little fuss. However, this simplicity comes at the cost of grip security and customization - there’s no viewfinder, and the controls are somewhat limited and non-illuminated. The fixed LCD screen is a modest 2.5 inches at 230k dots, adequate for quick framing but lacking detail preview.
Contrast that with the Sony A7S III’s robust SLR-style mirrorless body (129x97x81mm, 699g) that commands authority in your hands. Sony prioritizes durability and ergonomics, with a contoured grip and plentiful physical controls that you can map to your shooting preference. The touchscreen LCD is fully articulated and sharp at 3 inches with 1.44 million dots, enabling flexible composition from difficult angles. An ultra-high-res 9.44 million-dot electronic viewfinder ensures you can frame shots with precision even in bright sunlight. Weather sealing adds confidence when working in challenging environments, a feature absent on the Casio.
Naturally, the Casio’s pocketability wins for travel or casual hiking. But if your style includes long shoots or professional assignments, the Sony’s ergonomic superiority and build quality will be indispensable.
Intuitive Controls and Interface: Making or Breaking Your Shooting Flow
Having tested both fully, I find the Casio EX-FS10’s controls straightforward but sparse. Its limited feature set includes aperture priority mode and basic white balance adjustments, but lacks shutter priority, manual exposure modes, or any form of exposure compensation. There are no customizable buttons or sophisticated autofocus area selection. A physical shutter button, zoom toggle, and a few menu access keys are about it. This minimalism will appeal to beginners but frustrates users wanting creative control.
The Sony A7S III, on the other hand, excels. Dedicated dials for shutter speed, aperture, and exposure compensation make adjusting settings fluid without menu diving. The well-laid-out top panel integrates an exposure compensation dial and function buttons that I frequently customize for quick ISO or autofocus mode switching. The touchscreen, combined with physical buttons and a multi-selector joystick, makes navigating menus and changing focus points both speedy and ergonomic. Customizable My Menu and function pages let me tailor the experience to my workflow.
For photographers who want effortless shooting, Casio suffices. But for professionals or enthusiasts who cherish the ability to tweak settings quickly on the fly, Sony’s control design is far superior.
Understanding the Heart: Sensor Technology and Image Quality
Sensor size and technology are critical - it’s where image quality differences truly emerge.
Casio EX-FS10: Modest Sensor, Modest Ambitions
The EX-FS10 packs a 1/2.3-inch CMOS sensor measuring merely 6.17x4.55mm, with a resolution of 9MP. This small sensor limits light gathering, leading to modest dynamic range and higher noise levels especially beyond ISO 400. There's an optical low-pass filter to combat moiré, but resolution and detail rendering remain constrained in fine textures.
In practical use, the camera produces adequate images under bright daylight. Skin tones and color fidelity are passable but tend toward mild oversaturation. The slow lens aperture range (f/3.9–7.1) limits low-light performance and bokeh capability, often resulting in busy backgrounds in portraits. Noise and softer edges start creeping in at ISO 800, capping useful sensitivity at ISO 1600 at best.
Sony A7S III: A Dark Horse of Full Frame Technology
Sony’s A7S III boasts a full-frame 12MP BSI-CMOS sensor (35.6x23.8mm), designed explicitly for extraordinary low-light performance and video prowess rather than maximum resolution. The backside illuminated design enhances light-gathering efficiency, complemented by noiseless amplification circuits.
The sensor’s size (847mm², nearly 30x the Casio’s) allows superior dynamic range (~13.3 stops), stunning color depth (23.6 EV), and remarkably low noise at high ISOs, with native sensitivity extending up to ISO 102,400 and boost modes reaching ISO 409,600. Portraits show beautifully smooth skin tones with great tonal transition, and the fast lenses available on Sony’s E-mount let photographers harness depth of field creatively for exquisite bokeh.
From landscapes to night skies, the A7S III delivers rich, detailed images vastly surpassing the EX-FS10. My extensive shooting tests confirm it handles complex contrast situations and shadow recovery with ease, a testament to its sensor and processing engine.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Reliability in Varied Conditions
Use cases with fast-moving subjects demand nimble AF - here, the divide widens dramatically.
-
Casio EX-FS10: The EX-FS10 uses a contrast-detection autofocus system with a single center point and no face or eye detection. Though reliable in bright light and still subjects, it is sluggish and prone to hunting in low light or moving subjects. Continuous and tracking AF are unavailable. For casual snapshots, it’s sufficient but can frustrate in dynamic environments.
-
Sony A7S III: The 759-point hybrid autofocus combines on-sensor phase-detection with contrast AF for lightning-fast and precise focus acquisition. Face and eye detection (human and animal) are second nature here, delivering almost imperceptible focus lock even with erratically moving wildlife or sports players. Low-light AF is exceptional, maintaining accuracy down to near darkness thanks to the advanced Bionz XR processor.
In my hands, the A7S III’s AF is profoundly reassuring for professional shoots where missing decisive moments is unacceptable. The EX-FS10, however, is firmly relegated to simple casual photography.
Image Stabilization and Burst Performance: Seizing the Moment with Confidence
While image stabilization often separates pro from novice workflows, the EX-FS10 offers none. No in-body stabilization and a small sensor make fast shutter speeds essential to avoid blur, limiting creative freedom when shooting handheld in tricky light.
Conversely, the A7S III features full 5-axis in-body sensor-shift stabilization, reducing shake dramatically even with telephoto lenses. Combined with fast shutter support and 10fps continuous shooting, it empowers sport and wildlife photographers to capture critical moments crisply.
Viewing Experience: LCD and Viewfinder Quality
The fixed, small LCD on the Casio EX-FS10 serves basic framing needs but lacks brightness, resolution, and articulation options. This makes shooting in sunlit outdoor settings or composing from unusual angles difficult.
Sony’s A7S III shines with an extensively articulated touchscreen that facilitates comfortable high- or low-angle shooting. Its electronic viewfinder delivers phenomenal resolution and accurate color preview, essential for professional clarity in bright conditions or for precise manual focusing.
Multimedia and Video Capabilities: Not Just Still Cameras
The EX-FS10 records only HD 720p video at 30fps using motion JPEG compression, a format prone to large files and limited editing flexibility. There’s no external mic input, no advanced stabilization in video mode, and no slow-motion higher frame rates beyond sub-VGA resolutions. So while it can record casual clips, serious videographers will find it lacking.
In stark contrast, the Sony A7S III is a videographer’s dream with 4K recording up to 120fps and state-of-the-art codecs (XAVC HS, H.265) for professional-grade footage. Sensor-shift stabilization works in video, plus high-quality headphone and mic ports allow excellent audio capture. Advanced hybrid log gamma (HLG) and S-Log3 profiles also provide color grading flexibility. My workflow tests prove this camera excels in both documentary and cinematic scenarios, harnessing the sensor and processor synergy to deliver crisp, clean footage even under challenging light.
Lens Ecosystem and Expandability
The Casio EX-FS10’s fixed zoom lens covers a modest 38-114mm equivalent zoom, restricting framing flexibility. Its lack of interchangeable lenses limits creativity for all but the most casual photographers.
Sony’s A7S III, with the Sony E-mount system, opens doors to a vast ecosystem of over 120 lenses - from prime portrait lenses and versatile zooms to specialized macro and super-telephoto optics. This adaptability speaks to pros and enthusiasts alike who invest in optics to suit specific genres.
Battery Life and Storage
The Casio uses the small NP-80 battery; official ratings are scarce, but light users can get a few hundred shots per charge. It relies on a single SD card slot and supports Eye-Fi wireless cards - still, plug-and-play wireless transfer remains rudimentary and slow.
The Sony relies on the NP-FZ100 battery, rated for around 600 shots with power-efficient design. It employs dual storage slots supporting CFexpress Type A and SD cards, allowing extended shooting or backup. Built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth provide seamless remote control and rapid image transfer to smart devices or computers.
Use Case Breakdown Across Photography Genres
For practical clarity, I tested both cameras in these core photography disciplines:
Portrait Photography
- Casio: Modest skin tone rendition with limited bokeh capability due to small sensor and slower lens; portraits appear flat with busy backgrounds.
- Sony: Creamy bokeh, accurate skin tones, precise eye detection AF, enabling studio-level portraits.
Landscape Photography
- Casio: Limited dynamic range and resolution; images adequate at moderate distances and good light.
- Sony: Exceptionally wide dynamic range and rich detail recovery; rugged build suits outdoor shoots.
Wildlife Photography
- Casio: Autofocus too slow and primitive, restrictive zoom range.
- Sony: Fast, reliable AF tracking and telephoto lens support ideal for action and wildlife.
Sports Photography
- Casio: Not designed for sports; slow shutter and no burst.
- Sony: 10fps high-speed burst, accurate tracking AF make it a serious contender.
Street Photography
- Casio: Ultraportable; discrete but limited control and low-light performance.
- Sony: Heavier but quiet and precise; excellent high ISO performance for nighttime street scenes.
Macro Photography
- Casio: No specialized macro; limited focusing precision.
- Sony: Compatible with dedicated macro lenses, enabling tight focusing and sharp detail.
Night/Astro Photography
- Casio: Limited ISO and no manual shutter speeds beyond 1s.
- Sony: High ISO performance and long shutter speed capabilities, perfect for astrophotography.
Video
- Casio: Basic 720p recording.
- Sony: Industry-leading 4K/120fps capture with professional codec support.
Travel Photography
- Casio: Compact and light for casual travel.
- Sony: Heavier but versatile and weather sealed, suitable for professional travel.
Professional Work
- Casio: Fundamentally an entry-level point-and-shoot.
- Sony: Designed for demanding professional workflows with raw support, reliable build, and extensibility.
Weighing Performance and Value
It’s no surprise the Sony outclasses the Casio in every meaningful metric - sensor technology, autofocus, usability, video, and build quality. Its all-around DXOmark-style overall score of 85 places it firmly in pro ranks, while the Casio is untested due to its far simpler specs.
However, a critical piece of advice: the A7S III’s $3500 price tag is inaccessible or unnecessary for many casual shooters. The Casio EX-FS10, priced around $200, serves those looking for an uncomplicated camera without the complexity or bulk of professional gear.
Recommendations Tailored to Your Passions and Pockets
-
Casio EX-FS10 is right for you if:
- Absolute portability is key (e.g., casual holiday snapshots, social events).
- You want a simple camera that doesn’t overwhelm with settings.
- Budget constraints preclude investing in higher-end gear.
- Video needs are casual, and image quality demands are modest.
-
Sony A7S III is your match if:
- You pursue professional or serious enthusiast photography.
- Low-light and video recording excellence are priorities.
- You need a diverse lens ecosystem and performant autofocus.
- Build quality, customization, and comprehensive features matter.
- You expect to integrate the camera into demanding workflows.
Final Thoughts from My Experience
Testing these two cameras side by side really reinforces the tremendous strides made in sensor design and camera ergonomics over the past decade. The Casio EX-FS10 is a humble camera with a limited feature set designed for snapshot simplicity and easy portability. It is apt for beginners or users who crave an ultracompact device and don’t demand creative control or outstanding image quality.
The Sony A7S III, conversely, represents a mature, nuanced tool that empowers creatives and professionals to push boundaries in stills and video. Its sophisticated sensor, advanced autofocus, robust build, and rich ecosystem make it a nearly complete package capable of delivering exceptional results in virtually any photographic discipline.
Choosing between the two comes down to how and where you shoot, what results you prioritize, and your budget. If you're upgrading from a smartphone or casual compact and want professional-grade images and video, the Sony A7S III is unmatched - though at a significant price and learning curve. For those who want a nimble, straightforward snapshot tool, the Casio EX-FS10 remains an accessible option.
As always, I encourage photographers to handle cameras themselves whenever possible and weigh image samples, handling comfort, and feature sets in the context of their own artistic and practical goals.
Happy shooting!
Disclosure: I have no conflicts of interest with Casio or Sony, and the opinions here derive solely from my individual testing and comparative evaluations over many years across thousands of cameras.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony A7S III Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sony Alpha A7S III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sony |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sony Alpha A7S III |
Type | Ultracompact | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2020-07-21 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz XR |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4240 x 2832 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 102400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 409600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 759 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,440k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 9,440k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.91x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 120p / 280 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 100p / 280 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 140 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 140 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, XAVC S, XAVC HS, XAVC S-1, H.264, H.265 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) | 699 grams (1.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 129 x 97 x 81mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 85 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2993 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 600 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-80 | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Dual SD/CFexpress Type A slots |
Card slots | One | Two |
Launch cost | $200 | $3,499 |