Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 II
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-620 and Olympus E-M10 II, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are produced by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-620 was manufactured 7 years earlier than the E-M10 II and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-620 scores versus the E-M10 II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-620 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus E-M10 II
E-620 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus E-620
E-M10 II | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | July 2009 | More recent by 74 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus E-M10 II
E-620 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 has got outer measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 II has proportions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-620 and Olympus E-M10 II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the E-620 against the E-M10 II.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and E-M10 II is 71 and 82 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by viewing specs. The visual underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and E-M10 II.
All in all, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus E-M10 II to result in more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older E-620 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-07-06 | 2015-08-25 |
Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 lbs) | 390g (0.86 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | 842 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | 320 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $799 | $499 |