Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung ST95
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
![Casio Exilim EX-G1 front Casio Exilim EX-G1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-G1/Casio-EX-G1-front.jpg)
![Samsung ST95 front Samsung ST95 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-ST95/Samsung-ST95-front.jpg)
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and ST95 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The EX-G1 was revealed 14 months prior to the ST95 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-G1 grades against the ST95 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-G1 & Samsung ST95. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-G1 Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Samsung ST95
EX-G1 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Casio EX-G1
ST95 | EX-G1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | November 2009 | Fresher by 14 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung ST95
EX-G1 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-G1 has got outer measurements of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") and a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung ST95 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-G1 vs the ST95.
![Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung ST95 size comparison Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung ST95 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-G1-vs-Samsung-ST95-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-G1 and ST95 is 94 and 99 respectively.
![Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-G1-vs-Samsung-ST95-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out specs. The visual here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-G1 and ST95.
All in all, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung ST95 to show greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-G1 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
![Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-G1-vs-Samsung-ST95-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-G1-vs-Samsung-ST95-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung ST95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung ST95 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-11-18 | 2011-01-19 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | - |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | () |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.40 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 154 gr (0.34 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-800 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $61 | $145 |