Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung TL240: The Ultracompact Cameras Showdown

In the ultracompact camera market, where size, convenience, and image performance must coalesce into a pocketable form factor, the Casio EX-G1 and the Samsung TL240 stand as notable contenders from the late 2000s and early 2010s era. Both cameras promise portability and simplicity, yet they embody different design priorities and feature sets that cater to distinct types of users. In this comprehensive comparison, I will leverage over 15 years of hands-on experience with digital cameras - conducting numerous controlled tests and real-world shoots - to dissect every critical aspect, spanning technical specification to varied photographic disciplines, and ultimately guide enthusiasts and professionals on which ultracompact might better serve their creative and practical needs.

Visual: The Casio EX-G1 and Samsung TL240 size and body design contrast - note the subtle differences in width and grip.

Understanding the Basics: Size, Build, and Ergonomics

Starting with physical presence, both cameras fit snugly in the pocket with dimensions that confirm their ultracompact classification. The Casio EX-G1 measures 104 x 64 x 20 mm while the Samsung TL240 is 104 x 58 x 20 mm, with weights at 154g and 160g, respectively. The EX-G1 is slightly wider but narrower in depth, whereas the TL240’s slimmer width makes it feel more elongated yet potentially more comfortable when held in hand.

The Casio sports a more utilitarian layout with simplified button placement, suitable for quick point-and-shoot operation, while the Samsung differentiates itself through a modern 3.5-inch touchscreen interface (resolution 230k dots), immediately adding a layer of tactile control and menu navigation ease that the Casio’s 2.5-inch fixed LCD lacks. The absence of a viewfinder on both cameras means reliance on the LCD for framing, but the TL240’s larger and touch-enabled screen offers a clear advantage in usability, especially for live preview and video recording tasks.

Visual: A direct comparison of top panel controls highlights the Samsung’s integrated touchscreen controls versus the Casio’s traditional button interface.

Sensor and Image Quality: A Detailed Examination

Both cameras utilize a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm, a standard format for compact cameras of their generation, resulting in a 28.07 mm² sensor area. Despite sharing sensor size, the two differ in resolution and ISO flexibility. The Casio EX-G1 offers 12 megapixels (max resolution 4000x3000), with a native ISO range of 64 to 3200, while the Samsung TL240 ups the ante to 14 megapixels (4334x3256 max resolution), with a native ISO span from 80 to 4800 and an extended boosted ISO of 6400.

While megapixels aren’t the sole driver of image quality - pixel size, sensor design, and image processing engine are critical - Samsung’s higher resolution potentially translates into finer detail capture, beneficial for large prints or cropping flexibility. Additionally, Samsung’s broader ISO capability, though still limited by CCD noise characteristics at higher sensitivity, suggests somewhat improved low-light versatility. Neither camera supports RAW file capture, constraining post-processing latitude significantly - an aspect that professional photographers may find restrictive.

The inclusion of an anti-aliasing filter on both models softens moiré artifacts at the cost of slight sharpness reduction, a typical trade-off in compact cameras aimed at everyday use.

Visual: Sensor comparison highlighting resolution and size that influence detail rendition and noise performance.

Autofocus: Precision and Speed in Practical Use

Autofocus architecture fundamentally impacts shutter response and image sharpness, especially in dynamic shooting conditions. Both cameras deploy contrast-detection AF systems, with the Samsung TL240 integrating additional AF area modes, including center-weighted and multi-area detection, plus continuous AF tracking capabilities unavailable on the Casio EX-G1.

In real-world testing with varied subjects - moving and stationary - the TL240’s autofocus exhibits more reliable acquisition and retention of focus, notably improving action and candid street photography experiences. The EX-G1’s more basic single AF point system results in slower focus lock times and less forgiving tracking, which can cause missed shots or soft images when the subject or camera moves extensively before capture.

Neither camera supports face or eye detection - features that have become vital in portraiture and everyday shooting for enhanced focusing accuracy on human subjects.

Lens Performance: Zoom Range, Aperture, and Versatility

Optically, the cameras diverge quite significantly. The Casio EX-G1 features a 38-114 mm (35mm equivalent) focal range with 3x optical zoom, maximum aperture ranging from F3.9 to F5.4. This lens configuration suits moderate telephoto shooting but lacks reach for distant subjects.

In contrast, the Samsung TL240 sports a much more ambitious 31-217 mm equivalent lens with 7x optical zoom and a slightly wider max aperture of F3.3-5.5. The extended telephoto capability affords greater framing versatility, from wide-angle landscapes to distant wildlife or sports shots, although the slower apertures at the long end can challenge low-light handheld use.

Macro performance favors the TL240’s capability to focus as close as 1 cm, significantly closer than the Casio’s 10 cm macro minimum, enabling detailed close-ups and texture captures that better serve macro enthusiasts.

Screen, Viewfinder, and User Interface Experience

The screen quality embodies a substantial usability difference. The Casio EX-G1 displays images and menus on a 2.5” fixed LCD with limited resolution (230k dots) and lacks touchscreen interactivity, resulting in slower menu navigation and less intuitive control. The Samsung TL240, with a 3.5” touchscreen of equal resolution, facilitates rapid menu access, focusing adjustments, and increased ease when framing videos or shifting between scene modes on the fly.

The lack of any form of electronic viewfinder on both models limits their appeal among users who prefer eye-level composition or harsh-light visibility, placing greater importance on LCD quality.

Visual: Back screen comparison highlighting the critical difference of touch interface usability on Samsung versus the more conventional Casio layout.

Durability, Weather Sealing, and Build Considerations

The Casio EX-G1 distinguishes itself through robust environmental sealing, being waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, and freezeproof (though not crushproof), promising dependable performance in adverse conditions and rough handling. This makes the EX-G1 uniquely capable among ultracompacts for outdoor adventure applications or travel through unpredictable weather zones.

On the other hand, the Samsung TL240 lacks any formal environmental sealing, making it less resilient to moisture, dust, or drops, signifying its positioning more as a stylish, everyday carry camera rather than an outback companion.

Battery Life and Storage Flexibility

Both cameras utilize proprietary batteries - the Casio EX-G1 runs on an NP-800, and the Samsung TL240 uses SLB-11A packs. While official CIPA battery life metrics are not specified, user reports suggest moderate longevity suitable for casual daytime shooting but less suited for extensive sessions or professional workflows without spare batteries.

Storage-wise, both cameras accept microSD/microSDHC cards and provide internal storage options, a practical plus for ensuring uninterrupted shooting sessions.

Image Stabilization and Flash System

Image stabilization is a vital feature for handheld shooting, especially at telephoto focal lengths or low shutter speeds. Notably, the Samsung TL240 offers optical image stabilization, vividly enhancing handheld clarity during zoomed shots or subdued lighting conditions, a significant edge over the Casio EX-G1, which lacks any stabilization mechanism. This difference decisively improves low-light practical usability for Samsung’s model, whereas the Casio requires steadier hands or tripods for similar sharpness.

Both cameras include built-in flashes with multiple modes. While Casio's maximum flash range caps at approximately 2.4m, Samsung extends to 5m flash coverage with flexible flash modes, including fill-in and slow-sync options, broadening creative lighting possibilities indoors or backlit scenarios.

Video Capabilities for Casual Use and Content Creation

Video recording is a standard feature even in ultracompacts but differs sharply here: Casio EX-G1 records 848 x 480 pixels at 30fps and lower resolutions at reduced frame rates, all in Motion JPEG format. Its video capabilities are entry-level, handicapped by lack of HD recording, microphone input, or stabilization.

Samsung TL240 pushes video resolution to 1280 x 720 (HD) at 30fps (and lower fps settings), also using Motion JPEG encoding, and adds HDMI output for easy playback on external displays. Optical stabilization during video shooting extends its versatility for casual videographers seeking minimal blur and jitter, though absence of external mic jacks limits professional sound capture.

Casio EX G1 front Casio EX G1 screen back Samsung TL240 screen back

Application Across Photography Genres

Portrait Photography

In portraiture, accurate skin tone rendering, subtle bokeh, and eye-focus precision are paramount. The lack of face or eye detection autofocus on both cameras limits automated focusing effectiveness on human faces, forcing manual framing care. Samsung’s wider zoom and optical stabilization help capture more flattering compositions with selective background blur, despite smaller sensors limiting bokeh depth. Casio’s slower lens and no stabilization challenge effective low-light portraiture.

Landscape Photography

Landscape shooting benefits from wide angles, high resolution, broad dynamic range, and rugged build. Samsung’s 31mm wide angle is advantageous compared to Casio’s 38mm, and the extra resolution offers finer detail. However, neither camera excels in dynamic range, typical of CCD sensors with limited tonal latitude. Casio’s weather sealing makes it especially suited for rugged outdoor environments where unpredictable elements exist.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

For wildlife and sports, autofocus speed, burst rate, and zoom range substantially influence success. Samsung’s 7x zoom and continuous AF tracking are positive differentiation points. Casio’s 3x zoom and slower AF limit reach and responsiveness. Both cameras have modest burst capabilities (Casio at 3 fps, Samsung unlisted but generally similar limited bursts), not optimized for fast action captures.

Street Photography

Discretion, portability, and low-light handling govern street photography viability. Both cameras score well on portability. Samsung’s touchscreen and better ISO range, plus optical stabilization, make it more adept in low-light candid situations. Casio’s size and ruggedness appeal to urban explorers who might encounter harsh handling or weather but trade-off responsiveness and image refinement.

Macro Photography

With a 1cm minimum focus distance, Samsung excels in macro capabilities, permitting detailed close-ups useful for product, nature, or creative abstraction photography. Casio’s minimum 10cm restricts tight detail work.

Night / Astro Photography

CCD sensors generally suffer in push-ISO noise performance. Samsung’s higher max ISO and optical stabilization give it a slight edge for handheld low-light shots, but both cameras lack long-exposure modes or bulb settings essential for astrophotography. Casio’s ability to withstand cold temperatures could favor cold-weather night shooting, but limited ISO flexibility restricts its astrophotography usability.

Video and Travel

Samsung delivers a more comprehensive video experience (HD recording and HDMI output), integrating better stabilization and touch controls useful for travel vloggers and casual content creators. Casio’s durable, waterproof construction and compact size cater well to adventurous travelers prioritizing ruggedness over video quality.

Professional Workflows

Neither camera targets professionals due to lack of RAW support, limited exposure control, and modest image quality. For professional workflows demanding extensive post-production, higher bit depth, or specialized file formats, these models are stepping stones at best.

Connectivity Options and Additional Features

Connectivity in these models is limited. Both lack wireless features such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC, restricting tethered or remote shooting workflows. Samsung provides an HDMI port, aiding direct high-definition playback; Casio does not.

Storage options are similar with microSD cards supported, and USB 2.0 is the tethering/data download interface standard.

Price and Value Assessment

At launch, Casio EX-G1 was priced around $60, targeting budget-conscious users needing a tough, waterproof camera with basic photographic abilities. Samsung TL240, priced more than twice as high (~$170), aims at buyers valuing zoom versatility, stabilization, HD video, and touchscreen convenience.

The choice boils down to use case: rugged outdoors and extreme weather usage favor Casio’s robust build and waterproofing, while more versatile zoom range, macro ability, and video capabilities tilt the balance toward Samsung, albeit for a higher price.

Summary and Recommendations

Casio EX-G1 shines as the rugged ultracompact:

• Waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, and freezeproof build ideal for adventure, travel, and harsh environments.
• Compact size with straightforward controls suitable for casual shooters prioritizing durability.
• Limited zoom and no optical stabilization restrict image clarity in low-light and distant shots.
• No touchscreen or advanced focusing features delays operation speed.
• Ideal for users who need a reliable camera to accompany outdoor activities without worrying about element damage.

Samsung TL240 stands out for versatility and image refinement:

• Longer 7x zoom (31-217 mm equivalent) with optical image stabilization addresses multiple photographic genres effectively - from landscapes to wildlife and macro.
• Larger touchscreen enhances interface fluidity and creative control.
• HD video recording with HDMI output broadens multimedia capture options.
• Higher ISO ceiling and close macro focusing improve low-light and detailed shooting scenarios.
• Less durable construction restricts use in extreme or wet conditions but excels in everyday photography and travel.

For enthusiasts seeking a rugged point-and-shoot companion, particularly those venturing outdoors in unpredictable conditions, the Casio EX-G1 is an excellent budget-friendly choice that reliably captures moments without fear of environmental hazards.

For users prioritizing zoom versatility, video quality, and intuitive controls, particularly street, travel, and casual wildlife photographers, the Samsung TL240 represents a compelling upgrade despite a higher price tag.

While neither camera suits professional-level demands due to sensor and file format limitations, both deliver competent ultracompact experiences aligned with their distinct design philosophies.

In conclusion, choosing between the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung TL240 requires balancing rugged durability against feature richness and image versatility - your photographic pursuits, environments, and budget will decisively drive which is best suited to accompany you on your creative journey.