Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-H15
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-H15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-H15 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-H15, both Small Sensor Compact cameras and both of them are produced by Casio. The sensor resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the EX-H15 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H10 was brought out 6 months earlier than the EX-H15 and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-H10 grades vs the EX-H15 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-H15 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Casio Exilim EX-H15. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Casio EX-H15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Casio EX-H15
| EX-H10 | EX-H15 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Casio EX-H10
| EX-H15 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Casio EX-H15
| EX-H10 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2009 |  | January 2010 | Same generation |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-H15 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 comes with physical measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-H15 has dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-H15 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-H10 versus the EX-H15.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and EX-H15 is 93 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-H15 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specs. The pic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and EX-H15.
All in all, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Casio EX-H15 to provide you with greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-H15 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-H15 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Casio |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Casio Exilim EX-H15 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.2-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 461k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lb) | 161 gr (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | NP-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $300 | $300 |