Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S8100
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
![Casio Exilim EX-H10 front Casio Exilim EX-H10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Casio-Exilim-EX-H10.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix S8100 front Nikon Coolpix S8100 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S8100/Nikon-S8100-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S8100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Introduced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 180g - 104 x 60 x 30mm
- Launched September 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S8100 Overview
Below is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-H10 and Nikon S8100, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the S8100 (12MP) is very well matched and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The EX-H10 was brought out 15 months earlier than the S8100 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-H10 scores versus the S8100 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S8100 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Nikon Coolpix S8100. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Nikon S8100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Nikon S8100
EX-H10 | S8100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon S8100 over the Casio EX-H10
S8100 | EX-H10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2010 | ![]() | June 2009 | More recent by 15 months |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Nikon S8100
EX-H10 | S8100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S8100 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H10 provides outer dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Nikon S8100 has proportions of 104mm x 60mm x 30mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H10 and Nikon S8100 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-H10 against the S8100.
![Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S8100 size comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S8100 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H10-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S8100-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and S8100 is 93 and 93 respectively.
![Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S8100 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S8100 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H10-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S8100-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S8100 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading through specifications. The visual here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and S8100.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures however you may want to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The older EX-H10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
![Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S8100 sensor size comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S8100 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H10-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S8100-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S8100 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S8100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S8100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H10-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S8100-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S8100 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Nikon Coolpix S8100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Nikon Coolpix S8100 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-06-11 | 2010-09-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 160 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 30-300mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) | 180 gr (0.40 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 104 x 60 x 30mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $300 | $299 |