Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a78f/9a78f47f6e7ef816c7b7af0c8d3864f225321000" alt="Casio Exilim EX-H10 front Casio Exilim EX-H10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cd55/6cd55e755b246a73ebaa42d5216b8beb3a328143" alt="Olympus Stylus 9000 front Olympus Stylus 9000 front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Released June 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Here is a extensive overview of the Casio EX-H10 versus Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The EX-H10 was released within a month of the 9000 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-H10 scores vs the 9000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus 9000
EX-H10 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Casio EX-H10
9000 | EX-H10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus 9000
EX-H10 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2009 | ![]() | May 2009 | Similar generation |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H10 offers physical measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H10 versus Olympus 9000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-H10 against the 9000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbac0/bbac0f01f42f88b5b8890457d103a33f46bd1ec1" alt="Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and 9000 is 93 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/077d1/077d11fb4e2ade58876f0db9a6994183ba1ee0a8" alt="Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at technical specs. The photograph here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and 9000.
As you have seen, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution so you should expect similar quality of files though you have to consider the production date of the products into consideration.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01aae/01aae475eda56e3a523db4e987293e13cbc40599" alt="Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90ef5/90ef5519ad05220751c90543ba20fd0070f37873" alt="Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Also called | - | mju 9000 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-06-11 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 50 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.60 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 225g (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $300 | $300 |