Clicky

Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000

Portability
93
Imaging
34
Features
25
Overall
30
Casio Exilim EX-H10 front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
20
Overall
28

Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

Casio EX-H10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
  • Released June 2009
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Alternate Name is mju 9000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 Overview

Here is a extensive overview of the Casio EX-H10 versus Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The EX-H10 was released within a month of the 9000 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-H10 scores vs the 9000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus 9000

 EX-H10 9000 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Casio EX-H10

 9000 EX-H10 

Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus 9000

 EX-H10 9000 
ReleasedJune 2009May 2009Similar generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H10 offers physical measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-H10 versus Olympus 9000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-H10 against the 9000.

Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and 9000 is 93 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at technical specs. The photograph here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and 9000.

As you have seen, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution so you should expect similar quality of files though you have to consider the production date of the products into consideration.

Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Portrait photography advice
Olympus 9000 Portrait photography advice
27
focusing manually
no manual control
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
20
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-H10
Street photography with Olympus 9000
56
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
53
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
more heavy than others in class (225g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Sports photography information
Olympus 9000 Sports photography information
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
27
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Travel photography information
Olympus 9000 Travel photography information
57
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low resolution sensor (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
58
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long reach (280mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than others in class (225g)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus 9000 Landscape photography highlights
41
focusing manually
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
no manual control
low resolution sensor (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
lack of manual mode
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Vlogging features
Olympus 9000 Vlogging features
28
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic port
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone socket
more heavy than others in class (225g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H10 and Olympus 9000
 Casio Exilim EX-H10Olympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Company Casio Olympus
Model type Casio Exilim EX-H10 Olympus Stylus 9000
Also called - mju 9000
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2009-06-11 2009-05-14
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 64 50
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-240mm (10.0x) 28-280mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/3.2-5.9
Macro focusing range 7cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.60 m 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 194g (0.43 lbs) 225g (0.50 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-90 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $300 $300