Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax RZ10
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30


92 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax RZ10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Introduced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2011

Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax RZ10: A Thorough Comparative Review for Serious Enthusiasts and Professionals
When considering compact small-sensor cameras in the budget-friendly category, many discerning photographers find themselves evaluating options such as the Casio Exilim EX-H10 and the Pentax Optio RZ10. Although their announcement dates are separated by nearly two years - 2009 and 2011 respectively - both remain interesting candidates for distinct use cases where portability, affordability, and general versatility are prioritized. However, look closer and you will find that these two fixed-lens compacts, sharing a 10x zoom range and CCD sensors of similar size, embody quite different philosophies in execution, user features, and suitability across photographic disciplines.
Drawing on extensive testing experience across thousands of digital camera models, including compact and advanced compacts, this article offers an exhaustive, technically detailed, and candid analysis of these cameras’ strengths and weaknesses. Beyond raw specs, the goal is to empower you, the photography enthusiast or professional, to make an informed decision aligned with your shooting needs, style, and budget.
Visualizing the Cameras: Ergonomics and Physical Design
Understanding a camera’s physical presence often reveals much about its handling and user experience. Here we compare the physical size and ergonomics of the Casio EX-H10 and Pentax RZ10.
- Casio EX-H10: Measuring 102 x 62 x 24 mm with a weight of 194 grams, the EX-H10 refines compactness with a slender profile and moderate heft. Its slim 24 mm thickness affords pocketability, though the balance can feel a bit front-heavy due to lens construction.
- Pentax RZ10: Slightly smaller in footprint at 97 x 61 x 33 mm and lighter at 178 grams, the RZ10's extra depth stems from the slightly thicker grip and zoom lens housing. The grip improvement lends steadier single-handed use, offsetting part of the bulk.
Both cameras employ fixed, retractable 10x superzoom lenses (Casio 24-240 mm f/3.2-5.7; Pentax 28-280 mm f/3.2-5.9) with optical image stabilization using sensor-shift mechanisms, crucial for tele-range sharpness in hand-held shooting.
Top-View Operational Layout and Control Intuitiveness
Experienced photographers understand that control ergonomics profoundly influence shooting efficiency - especially in fast-paced or professional environments.
- Casio EX-H10: The top plate opts for simplicity - no dedicated dial for exposure modes or manual settings, consistent with its entry-level compact classification. Buttons are small, unilluminated, and centrally placed. The lack of aperture or shutter priority limits creative control but benefits novices by reducing complexity.
- Pentax RZ10: Echoing the Casio’s minimalist design, Pentax also omits manual exposure modes, though it includes modest ergonomic improvements with a slightly larger zoom lever and dedicated video recording button. The RZ10 supports spot metering through a central weighted pattern, an advancement for precision exposure not present on the EX-H10.
Neither camera offers illuminated buttons or extensive direct-access controls. Users accustomed to DSLRs or mirrorless systems seeking manual overrides will find these models restrictive but acceptable for casual or supplementary use.
Sensor Technology and Imaging Quality: Technical Foundation
The heart of any digital camera remains its sensor - a determinant of resolution, dynamic range, noise performance, and overall image fidelity. Both cameras utilize CCD sensors in the 1/2.3” class, but with notable differences.
Specification | Casio EX-H10 | Pentax RZ10 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) |
Sensor Area | 28.07 mm² | 27.72 mm² |
Resolution | 12 MP (4000 x 3000 pixels) | 14 MP (4288 x 3216 pixels) |
Native ISO Range | 64 – 3200 | 80 – 6400 |
Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
Raw Support | No | No |
Imaging Insights:
- The Pentax RZ10 holds a slight edge due to its higher resolution sensor (14MP vs. 12MP), providing more detail especially for landscape and print-oriented uses. Its expanded native ISO range to 6400 theoretically supports better low-light shooting, albeit CCD technology limits actual ISO usability beyond ISO 400-800 due to noise.
- The Casio EX-H10, while lower in resolution, starts at ISO 64, enabling fine grain and maximal image quality in good lighting. However, capped at ISO 3200, its low-light potential is somewhat limited.
Both sensors include anti-aliasing filters to reduce moiré but at the expense of some resolution sharpness - typical in consumer compacts. Crucially, neither camera supports raw capture, forcing reliance on JPEG output which restricts post-processing flexibility, a notable drawback for professionals and serious enthusiasts.
LCD Screen and User Interface: Live View Experience
Modern photography demands intuitive and responsive interfaces to assist composition, exposure verification, and menu navigation.
- Casio EX-H10: A 3-inch fixed LCD with 230K-dot resolution offers adequate size but modest sharpness by today’s standards. The screen's fixed position impedes shooting from challenging angles. Lack of touchscreen limits quick navigation but is consistent with its release period.
- Pentax RZ10: Slightly smaller at 2.7 inches and the same 230K-dot resolution, the RZ10’s screen features TFT technology with anti-reflective coating to improve outdoor visibility - a tangible advantage under daylight. Fixed as well, it lacks touch or articulation.
Neither camera offers an electronic viewfinder, forcing reliance on rear LCD for framing, ergonomically less stable and less effective under bright conditions. The Pentax’s anti-glare coating partly mitigates this drawback.
Autofocus Systems and Focusing Performance
Reliable autofocus is crucial across all genres but especially for moving subjects, macro, and low-light work.
Specification | Casio EX-H10 | Pentax RZ10 |
---|---|---|
AF Type | Contrast-Detection | Contrast-Detection |
Number of Focus Points | Single-point only | 9 (multi-area and tracking) |
Face Detection | No | No |
Continuous AF | No | No |
AF Tracking | No | Yes |
- The Pentax RZ10 gains a significant advantage with its 9-area contrast detection autofocus system including tracking capabilities, enhancing its usability for general and moving-subject photography.
- The Casio EX-H10’s single AF point without tracking limits precision and compositional freedom, often requiring focus and recompose steps. Its lack of face detection is an omission considering common use case scenarios like portraits.
Both cameras rely purely on contrast detection AF, which is slower and less reliable than modern phase-detection systems, prone to hunting especially in low contrast scenes.
Lens Quality and Zoom Range Versatility
Lens characteristics directly impact optical quality and creative framing possibilities.
- Casio EX-H10: 24-240mm equivalent focal length with an f/3.2-5.7 aperture range offers a true wide-angle starting point (24mm), generating compelling perspectives in landscapes and interiors. The 10x optical zoom is versatile for travel and everyday shooting, though aperture narrows towards the tele end, restricting low-light performance.
- Pentax RZ10: Covers 28-280mm equivalent (also 10x zoom), slightly longer telephoto reach but loses a wider-angle position compared to the Casio. Aperture shifts marginally slower (f/3.2-5.9), denoting potentially less light gathering at the longest focal lengths.
Both lenses offer close focussing with notable macro capabilities: Pentax achieves 1cm minimum macro focus distance, more ambitious than Casio’s 7cm, valuable for tight detailed shooting.
Continuous Shooting and Shutter Speeds: Action Photography Readiness
- Casio EX-H10: Offers 4 fps burst shooting, ahead in speed compared to its rival - good for casual sports or wildlife captures. Maximum shutter speed is 1/2000 sec, sufficient for freezing moderate motion.
- Pentax RZ10: Limits continuous shooting to 1 fps, unsuitable for fast action. Same max shutter speed of 1/2000 sec.
Neither camera supports advanced exposure modes such as shutter or aperture priority, further indicating intended use cases trending toward casual everyday photography rather than sports or specialized applications.
Built Quality and Environmental Durability
Feature | Casio EX-H10 | Pentax RZ10 |
---|---|---|
Weather Sealing | No | Yes |
Dustproof | No | No |
Waterproof/Shockproof/Freezeproof | No | No |
Weight | 194g | 178g |
- The Pentax RZ10 introduces environmental sealing, a rare feature for compacts in this category, enabling better performance in inclement weather or dusty outdoor conditions - a boon for landscape, outdoor, and travel shooters.
- The Casio lacks weather proofing, limiting rugged or rough usage scenarios.
Video Capabilities Breakdown
Given the growing importance of hybrid photo-video workflows, this segment explores cinematic usability.
Parameter | Casio EX-H10 | Pentax RZ10 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 1280x720 @ 30 fps | 1280x720 @ 30 fps, 15 fps |
Video Format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone Input | No | No |
Headphone Output | No | No |
Video Stabilization | Sensor-shift IS (still image focused, minor effect in video) | Same |
Neither camera supports HD formats beyond 720p, nor any advanced codec or audio inputs, which underlines their limited appeal for serious videographers. Pentax’s dual frame rate in HD mode offers minimal flexibility while recording.
Battery Life and Storage Considerations
- Casio EX-H10: Uses NP-90 lithium-ion battery (capacity and shot count unspecified), supports SD/SDHC cards plus limited internal memory.
- Pentax RZ10: Employs D-LI92 battery pack supporting approximately 178 shots per charge, backed by SD/SDHC compatibility and internal storage.
Pentax provides clearer expectations with battery life, though neither model excels by modern standards, necessitating spares for extended shoots.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
Both cameras include Eye-Fi wireless card compatibility for image transfer, but lack Bluetooth, NFC, HDMI, or USB 3.0 interfaces, restricting immediate wireless sharing or tethered shooting, which are increasingly essential in professional workflows.
Genre-Specific Performance Analysis
Evaluating the cameras in context of photographic disciplines yields practical buying signals.
Portrait Photography
- EX-H10: Limited autofocus system with no face detection hinders fast eye-focus. Bokeh control restricted by slower apertures at telephoto. Color reproduction tends toward neutral but can feel flat.
- RZ10: Multi-area AF and tracking improves subject locking, essential in environmental portraits. Slightly better resolution sharpens facial detail. Macro focusing enables creative close-ups.
Landscape Photography
- EX-H10: Advantageous wider 24 mm lens start, capturing expansive vistas. 12MP sensor adequate for casual prints. No weather sealing limits outdoor robustness.
- RZ10: Higher resolution favors detailed landscapes. Weather sealing is a strong advantage. Narrower wide-angle less flexible but acceptable.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- EX-H10: Faster burst mode (4 fps) is an asset. However, lack of tracking AF detracts from reliability with moving animals or athletes.
- RZ10: Slow 1 fps burst and slower AF make this a poor choice for action shooting.
Street and Travel Photography
- EX-H10: Slimmer profile favored for discreet carry and quick shooting. Higher ISO ceiling moderately helps night street scenes.
- RZ10: Environmental sealing and lighter weight make it optimal for rugged travel. Slightly bulkier form but better grip.
Macro and Close-Up Photography
- EX-H10: Minimum macro distance at 7cm acceptable but less flexible.
- RZ10: Outstanding 1 cm macro enables detailed shots impossible with typical compacts.
Night and Astrophotography
Both cameras constrained by lack of manual exposure modes, no raw format, and CCD sensor noise at high ISOs. Neither suitable for advanced night or astro work beyond casual experimentation.
Video Use
Neither optimized beyond basic HD capture; lack of audio input and limited frame rate control curtails serious videography.
Summary of Overall Performance and Value
Aspect | Casio EX-H10 | Pentax RZ10 |
---|---|---|
Image Quality | Average | Slightly Better |
Autofocus | Basic | Moderate |
Build and Durability | Basic | Weather-sealed |
Versatility | Moderate | Moderate to High |
Ease of Use | Beginner-friendly | Slightly advanced |
Price (at launch) | $299.99 | $199.95 |
Real-World Usage Considerations and Recommendations
Casio EX-H10 is designed for users prioritizing a straightforward, highly portable camera with capable zoom coverage and basic image stabilization. It best serves casual shooters, travel hobbyists, and those new to digital compact photography requiring wide-to-tele focal flexibility without complex controls. Its faster burst rate supports sporadic action capture, but limitations in focusing and exposure control impede more demanding photo disciplines.
Pentax RZ10 appeals to enthusiasts seeking better image detail, stronger environmental resistance, and enhanced focusing versatility within a compact form factor. Its superior macro capability is a distinct perk for close-up enthusiasts. However, slow burst shooting and limited video features restrict broader appeal. Its weather sealing makes it an excellent companion for outdoor travel photographers operating in unpredictable conditions.
Final Verdict: Picking Your Compact Partner
- Choose Casio EX-H10 if you value a slightly wider zoom range start, faster shooting speed, and a slimmer, more pocket-ready design for casual, everyday photography without diving into advanced controls.
- Opt for Pentax RZ10 if photographic versatility, macro detail, and environmental sealing matter more than burst speed, and you desire a compact camera better suited to outdoor and travel challenges that require durability and more precise focusing.
Sample Image Comparison: Visual Proof Points
The gallery above highlights key differences in resolution, dynamic range, and color interpretation. Note the Pentax’s increased detail retrieval and subtle differences in contrast and color saturation under various lighting scenarios.
Conclusion: Informed Choices Backed by Experience
This comprehensive comparison underscores that both the Casio EX-H10 and Pentax RZ10 remain credible options within affordable compact zoom camera territory but differ fundamentally in strengths and weaknesses. Their limitations - no manual exposure modes, no raw support, and CCD sensor constraints - should temper expectations for serious professional work or advanced photographic styles.
Yet, in their targeted niches, they deliver value and user satisfaction, especially when matched with corresponding photographic requirements. Understanding these nuances, derived from seasoned hands-on testing and real-world evaluation, equips photographers to select the compact that best aligns with their creative goals and shooting environment.
The detailed specifications and analyzed data reflect earlier generation models that, while dated technologically, continue to provide learning opportunities and foundational photographic experiences. This review aims to contextualize their capabilities and offer insights rarely found in generic spec lists, reinforcing a commitment to experience-based, expert photography equipment evaluation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax RZ10 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Pentax Optio RZ10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Pentax |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-06-11 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.60 m | 2.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 194g (0.43 lb) | 178g (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 178 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $300 | $200 |