Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung DV150F
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
96 Imaging
40 Features
29 Overall
35
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Introduced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung DV150F Overview
Following is a complete comparison of the Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung DV150F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and DV150F (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H10 was brought out 4 years earlier than the DV150F which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-H10 scores vs the DV150F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung DV150F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Samsung DV150F. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Samsung DV150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung DV150F
| EX-H10 | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV150F over the Casio EX-H10
| DV150F | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | June 2009 | More modern by 43 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung DV150F
| EX-H10 | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung DV150F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H10 comes with outer dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung DV150F has measurements of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung DV150F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-H10 versus the DV150F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and DV150F is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung DV150F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing a spec sheet. The pic below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and DV150F.
As you can see, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Samsung DV150F to show extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung DV150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung DV150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung DV150F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-06-11 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 pounds) | 116g (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $150 |